National Geographic's Professional Hit Job on 9/11 Truth

Discussion in '9/11' started by Brother Jonathan, Dec 9, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,697
    Likes Received:
    3,729
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh an internet tough guy. Those are so rare.

    A retired doctor with a class a builders license internet tough guy must be like a unicorn.
     
  2. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    stop this.

    no one here is going to prison.
     
  3. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    internet tough guy?

    inet_tough_guy.jpg
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Waiting for your attorney's call. The ball is in your court. You made the threat, let's see you follow up on it.
     
  5. Quantumhead

    Quantumhead New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2013
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is this supposed to be a joke? The building in your video had just undergone a controlled demolition.

    Stop lying or you're going on ignore.
     
  6. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Except the rainbow glitter in his hair, that's the real scary thing.
     
  7. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But seriously for you to mischarecterize my statement shows your desperation. The INTERIOR (as was stated in the original post) was mostly air (that is how office buildings and structures tend to be). I mean how could you rent office space if there was, well, no space? I was correct, the grapefruit has a better grasp of physics and engineering.
     
  8. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    :thumbsup:
     
  9. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ok, now lets talk about what the real facts are.

    the facts are, the experts say 9-11 wasn't an inside job.
     
  10. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    MOD EDIT>>>OFF TOPIC<<<

    there's no evidence that there were no planes at the WTC on 9-11.

    but there are countless videos of the 2nd plane crashing into the south tower.
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I don't support 'no planes'.
    MOD EDIT>>>OFF TOPIC<<<
     
  12. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd comment but, what's the point since it will be deleted, again.
     
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yet you constantly link to 'no planes' websites. How is that not supporting them?
     
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can't you get your own posts deleted too, boss?
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are you talking about?
     
  16. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The single beam over the fire pit was not connected to any other steel that could conduct heat away. Air could flow in from all sides to feed the fire. The exhaust gas could then flow straight up to suck in more air from the sides.

    In the WTC all of the steel was connected to other steel The only way for air to come in was through holes created by the plane coming in or parts flying out or windows broken by explosion. Then the exhaust gas had to go out through the same holes.

    Watch the videos and you see smoke coming out of the top of the holes. Fresh air had to go in through the bottom.

    That video was laughable. But the Truthers did a lousy job of debunking it. Did they have any information ahead of time or did they have to respond cold without any time to think about it? If so it was a setup.

    psik
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roll: It wasn't meant to be an exact analogy of what happened at the WTC,but a proof of the concept that steel loses it's structural integrity when exposed to fire
     
  18. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Steel loses structural integrity when it gets hot enough. Whether or not it could get hot enough in the WTC fires is the question. It takes lots more energy to get lots more steel hot enough, especially if it can be conducted away.

    Videos of all of the various skyscraper fires where the buildings did not collapse would have been more useful. How many fires would that be?

    psik
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Steel by itself isn;'t that good of a conductor of heat.
    All that was needed was localized heating to the trusses.

    And WHAT 'various skyscraper fires'?
     
  20. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    However due to the nature of the construction, it would not take much. Hence why the fire retardant was so liberally used
     
  21. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Just because copper and silver are better heat conductors doesn't make steel a bad conductor.

    Oh just a few:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyscraper_fire

    psik
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I said it's not as good, not 'poor'

    And the WTC towers are on your 'list' as well
     
  23. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    They were skyscrapers and they were on fire. Shocking!

    What other ones collapsed? Only 3 in the same place on the same day, and one was not hit by an airliner. And one that was hit by an airliner deflected FIFTEEN INCHES on impact. Funny that we never hear that.

    psik
     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Funny how you never get to the point, either...
     
  25. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The point is that office fires can not get hot enough to weaken steel enough to cause global collapse of buildings. That fact has been proven throughout all of history.
     

Share This Page