Need proof that systemic racism exists? (2) yes it’s a fact

As the title states, do you need proof that systemic racism exists? I will provide current acts that are quite literally preventing people from good health, work pay, and government funds literally based on race. The demographic that’s effected is not the one most would say is the demographic that has to face systemic racism. But it is written and practiced in broad daylight by none other than democrats.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ne...hite-people-low-supply-of-covid-19-treatments

need more?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/education/extra-pay-for-minority-teachers-as-minnesota-school-board-unanimously-votes-to-provide-stipends?_amp=true

How about even more?

https://www.agriculture.com/news/bu...4-billion-in-debt-relief-for-minority-farmers

 

not very surprising
This is straight from the liberal playbook
Do something and then accuse the other side of doing it
its too bad neither side seem capable of taking color out of the equation (its too valuable a weapon to their politics)

 

Did you have an issue when all those groups were left out in favor of heterosexual, white males getting all the privilege or does it matter now because it impacts you directly?

And, just the fact that minorities are being given priority in anything probably means it's a wolf in sheep's clothing.

 

Its restitution for the years of suffering caused by jim crow laws, not racism

 

So I looked for the actual document rather than Fox's summary.
https://coronavirus.health.ny.gov/s...during_resource_shortages_20211223_1000_0.pdf

Yes, there is one line mentioning that which has your panties in a bunch:
Non-white race or Hispanic/Latino ethnicity should be considered a risk factor, as longstanding systemic health and social inequities have contributed to an increased risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19

So if you read the entire document and got racism as the goal, then I think you may have RDS. Is it so odd that when treatment is prioritized for high risk groups, all factors and risks are considered?

 

Which of course by definition is racist.

 

Nope.

 

It most definitely is racism.

 

Nope.
Definition of racism

1: a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

 

Never in my lifetime have I taken priority as a white male over any other race by law. As for LGBTQ I also never was prioritized by law to receive anything they could not besides marriage. This is not about past wrongs anyway, this is about current wrong being put upon whites

 

So the act of slavery wasn’t racist? Just the thoughts of the slave owner?

 

Nope, slavery is not inherently racist.

 

If you are a white male that's not true.

I didn't say it was. I asked if you clutched your pearls when everybody other than white males were excluded? And, if you didn't, can you see why some people might be inclined to not give a damn about this?

 

Yet the same sort of advocacy happens all around the world (and has been for several decades) without being labelled segregation or racism.

 

And of course the truth lies buried in the actual articles:

"In 1920, roughly one in every six farmers was Black. Today, less than 2% of U.S. farms have Black operators. Black farms are one-fourth of the size of the average U.S. farm, with smaller sales, and they are located mostly in the South. In 2007, the USDA Census of Agriculture said that a smaller portion of Black farmers than white farmers received federal farm payments and that the amount they received was half the U.S. average."

 

THen they should be charging the Democrats who created Jim Crow laws.

 

So enslaving another race because they are thought of as a lessor species and treated like cattle, isn't racist.
I bet the democrat party who did enslave blacks would be glad to hear that but I don't think you will have much luck selling that idea to blacks.

 

[QUOTE="Condor060, post: 1073164660, member: 79340"]So enslaving another race because they are thought of as a lessor species and treated like cattle, isn't racist.
I bet the democrat party who did enslave blacks would be glad to hear that but I don't think you will have much luck selling that idea to blacks.[/QUOTE]

Yes, that is racist, but enslaving another race that you don't think are lessor species and treated like cattle, isn't racist.

 

In 'Hunger Games' there was such a moment when they decided: We won our revolution so now let's make them play the hunger games!

I'm not an American but it just seems wrong to fix racism and bigotry with racism and bigotry in the opposite direction.

Just take a look at Biden's executive orders:

White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Native Americans and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities

Advancing Equity, Justice, and Opportunity for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders

White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity Through Historically Black Colleges and Universities

White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Hispanics

White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans

Why do they mention every race by name except for white even though Asians for example earn more than any other racial group and Nigerians more than any other ethnic group?

 

Racism nor bigotry can be "fix", just mitigated. How would you level the playing field?

 

~ That is referred to by Democrats as " two wrongs make it right " ...

 

Yes it absolutely is

 

Yes it is systemic racism.....though not the kind the Left Wing media likes to portray!

 

To end racism.....you need more. I get it!

 

This is just additional proof of systemic racism. Affirmative action, widely supported by Democrats, and completely supported by the left, is de jure systemic racism, too. The left and most Democrats support systemic racism. It just depends against which group the policy discriminates; specifically, if the policy is against white people, in particular white men, they fully support that.