NEW EVIDENCE SUPPORTING CREDIBILITY OF TARA READE’S ALLEGATION AGAINST JOE BIDEN EMERGES

There's no evidence of this. What you seem to think is evidence of this, is not.

That's not true. Mark Judge's statement said "I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes." That's a denial.

Your post there has out-dated and factually incorrect information. For example, "devil's triange" was, in fact, a drinking game:

 

Reade's "credibility" is Non-Existent...

 

Really? To me a denial is "it didn't happen". And I would have expected a clear "it didn't happen" from somebody who was signaled as a direct witness and, therefore, an accomplice. I mean... that statement is as vague as they get. It leaves room for him to, if necessary, later argue for example "she said he grabbed her with his right hand, but it was actually his left hand. Therefore, it was not as Dr. Ford describes. Therefore I did not commit perjury"

So this, to anybody who has the most basic capability of rational thought and deduction, would be one more clue that something did happen.

There are many references from before the Kavanaugh hearings. For example
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Devils Triangle

Your reference is.... nowhere in sight. Therefore, my case is made...

Besides... claiming that they invented a drinking game, and somehow decided to give it a name that "just happened" to be the same as what, at the time, was known as a sexual act, is beyond ludicrous. One expects reason and logic to not be optional in these debates. Am I expecting too much? At a minimum it should not be optional when appointing somebody to the Supreme Court of the United States.

 

Credibility? Suddenly the word of victims is no good?

 

There are a lot of holes in her story. If she wants credibility, she'll have to fill those.

 

It's becoming apparent that you and I have wildly divergent definitions of "ludicrous". I haven't seen much evidence that "at the time" it was commonly known as a sexual act. Did you present some somewhere? Your urbandictionary.com "cite" was from 2008. Got anything from the early '80's? Aside from your lack of evidence, even if in some quarters of the country it was a known label for a sexual act, there's nothing that demonstrates that Brett Kavanaugh and his high school friends were aware of that, and I see no reason to disbelieve the statement by his classmates that it was indeed the name of a drinking game for them and had no connection to anything sexual.

 

And if you have decided that you won't... you won't! Regardless of how much research I do for you. So why should I waste my time?

Nope! Al Gore was still working on it.

 

It's got nothing to do with doing research for me, it's about supporting things you've claimed. Since you can't do that, well, I know where that leaves us. For someone that claims to have taken "a long time to research the validity of [your] arguments", you rarely appear to have done so.

 

LOL! That wasn't required with Ford when she claimed to have been a victim. Why the difference?

 

You know why: they have different evidentiary standards depending on the political affiliation of the accused.

 

Sure it was. Ford failed to fill in some details and Kavanaugh was confirmed in spite of her.

(The "duh!" was silent there. )