New Study : Proximity to Frakking Increases Birth Defects!

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by happy fun dude, Feb 1, 2014.

  1. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do you suppose this is politically motivated? Because you don't agree with it because of your own political bias?

    - - - Updated - - -

    You can't check mate on a logical fallacy.. You made the claim, so don't swop the burden of proof. I doubt very much cavemen were frakking.
     
  2. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Fair enough. Would you think it's prudent to do that additional research prior to continuing the frakking, to determine it's safe first?

    Do you think maybe that sometimes we do things a bit too soon before determining their safety?

    - - - Updated - - -

    You didn't think I'd notice him there, did you?
     
  3. 3link

    3link Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    10,799
    Likes Received:
    4,432
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Check
    Mate
     
  4. Wolfpack

    Wolfpack Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    3,138
    Likes Received:
    1,699
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, because there is no evidence to suggest that it is unsafe. As I stated (3 times, no less) in my original post: Correlation does not imply causation.
    Absolutely. I just don't see this as being an example of that.
     
  5. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,526
    Likes Received:
    15,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If it turns out like Thalidomide, frakking will be toast.
     
  6. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One taxpayer funded propaganda exercise by three libs is not very convincing.

    If government is willing to spend an equal amount for a study by three academic's chosen by Exxon Corp then we can put the results side by side and discuss them.

    But till then your motion is not accepted.
     
  7. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'll look at any other studies gladly. How do you know the political affiliation of those scientists, though?
     
  8. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just a lucky guess.
     
  9. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How did you confirm you guessed right?
     
  10. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They work at a liberal university where most of the employees are libs.

    The odds are 99 to 1 that they are libs.
     
  11. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,865
    Likes Received:
    16,308
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hydraulic fracking is not only worthwhile, it's a virtual economic necessity for the United States.

    Under the current political climate, it is the only path toward energy independence.

    Under the current political climate, it's the only way this country is going to make a serious dent in its trade defecit (which has already begun to happen), and the only way we'll ever get out of the mountian of debt that we've inherited from two irresponsible GOP administrations, a war in the wrong country and the economic collapse.

    It has already bequeathed us with tremendous economic leverage, which you can see with the talks over Iran, and Russia's bellicose impotence.

    Still, fracking is not safe, and we need to make it safe.

    Repeal the Halliburton loophole!
     
  12. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,865
    Likes Received:
    16,308
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think it has saved us a nickel at the gas pumps, nor is it likely to.

    It will get us close to energy independence, and maybe we can use the reprieve (and a reprieve is what Fracking is) to develop the technologies we're going to need when the oil runs out.

    Alas, if we do, we will have no help from the global warming denier, who carry big oil's water and work to insure that we will be sucking at the oil tit for a long time to come.
     

Share This Page