No Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower on 911

Discussion in '9/11' started by 7forever, Apr 3, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Why is it impossible?....
     
  2. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Because a plane flying 500 mph could not make those video game turns around the rear of the towers. And, the government had it flying pretty much south to north behind the towers. Their animation represents, I think, a plausible final approach for 175 that doesn't depict any impossible turns. Also, notice T1 has the nosedive seen in the Naudet clip. The gov's final approach does not have it wrapping around the towers like so many other clips, including the ball footage. That is what created the shadow movement that is seen between the towers just before the explosion.

    [​IMG]
    911 Commission Hearing Flight paths into WTC - YouTube
     
  3. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    7forever, you're mixed up about what the ("government"? You mean the NTSB) flight path. There was no sudden turn, nor does the NTSB flight path show such. UA175 was not tracking South to North, it was coming in from the South West. I don't see how it is impossible for UA175 to pass to the east of the North Tower, and hit the South Tower... I really cannot see a problem here..

    Did you watch the link I gave you?

    Edit - but sudden, I mean sharp. There was a turn, just not a very hard one.
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,951
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so have the troughers figured out the difference yet between up and down vs left to right? They seemed to think its a matter of perspective or some silly thing like that.

    I hear NIST is hiring
     
  5. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where is you proof the turn made on the video is "impossible hard turn"?...Second, IT DID NOT WRAP AROUND THE TOWERS....you claims is BULSH.
     
  6. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    CJ must ignore or simply pretend that the fake image isn't turning or that the ball is.:xd::grin: The ball was moving in a straight line, unlike the fake image below it.

    The truth on 911 needs no witness other than fake plane images and an orb coming from west of the towers. NO PLANE of any kind could have passed east of tower 1 only two seconds before impacting the southeast corner of tower 2. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE and no one who supports the official lies would say it is either.

    I doubled the speed of WB11's ball and fake plane image.. The wingless orb was shown 6-8 times between 9:03-9:26, with the fake image making its debut only one minute after the last orb. The distinct difference besides that one is a ball and the other a fake plane with no wings, is the ball moves in a straight line, west to east, and the fake plane is turning left, to the north, sharply, as a way to make the flight path more plausible.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obt-1d9POXM
    WPIX (WB11) 9/11 9:21 - 9:31 - YouTube
     
  7. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    There was an impossible hard turn which is depicted perfectly on wb11 and every fake image coming from the west. You can only ignore that your fantasy plane was flying 500 mph and could make that turn out of sight, of course. Had that really happened, it could not have been wrapping around the around the towers in the final 1-2 seconds before explosion.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The plane was not moving in a straight line...it was banked to the left....on a right to left turn. That's well document. The video in which you claim the plane is moving in a straight line, is doing nothing of the sort. It only appears that way due to the angle from which the video is shot.

    Are you really that stupid? This is why people like you shouldn't be allowed internet access. Information, you're doing it wrong.
     
  9. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's mind boggling that no-planers even exist.
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,951
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    now that we know every plane video has been faked its beyond comprehension that planers still exist



    [​IMG]
     
  11. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You remind me of the scarecrow singing, "If I only had a brain".

    So, you're a no-planer, also?
     
  12. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    woman_wtc.jpg

    Yeah....they look just alike.
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,951
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
  14. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Good. So you agree a pumpkin can be shot through both sides of a boat "under certain conditions"....why not a plane through the side of a building?
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,951
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    Trophy Points:
    113

    huh? You have not put up any conditions that would support a plane would go through those huge steel columns like the road runner.

    thats totally illogical
     
  16. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    CJ doesn't understand what 'below the height of the towers means.:roflol: Below the top and above the bottom.:roll:

    The fake image passes east of the north tower just before tower 2 explodes. This is 100% inconsistent with every other final approach, official or fake. The official flight path has it correct for a real plane, which does NOT pass east of T1, only 1-2 seconds before explosion, because it's over the bay where had to be for a real plane crash. The shadow movement between the towers can only occur if it makes an impossible last second turn, which the real object apparently did. At least the last 5-7 seconds of fake 175 is entirely behind the towers, therefore making it impossible to create the shadow movement between the towers that really occurred.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    911 Commission Hearing Flight paths into WTC - YouTube
     
  17. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually its not. You just don't understand what you're talking about.
     
  18. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You are a proven liar. The divebomber is never seen between the towers, below the top of them. That is in fact, the irrefutable proof that they are not the same. It eliminates any time difference or perception excuses. The real flight path performed an impossible last second turn for any kind of plane.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your gifs are obviously from two different cities: the color of the sky is different in each one.
     
  20. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Little known fact: The twin towers were actually the Quad Towers. One pair in NYC, the other in Beijing.
     
  21. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    7forever, did you watch the video I linked?
     
  22. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I asked him that before, and koko. The sun was out and shining on 9/11, with bright, clear blue skies. Why is it in his videos the sky is (*)(*)(*)(*) brown?
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,951
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    if you are unhappy then contact the news media who aired them!
     
  24. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One set is from the time/space continuum in which this web site is hosted, the other, not.
     
  25. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    If you're claiming that better footage of WB11's ball or whatever whatever it was, exists, then please post it.:thumbsup:

    "I believe that could be a police helicopter" and then T2 explodes one second later. She changes it to what is supposed to be a plane. In fact, listen to her question what she saw right after she failed to identify it as a chopper, but the cat's out of the bag. In Chopper 4, the reporter says there's been another explosion, but never acknowledges the orb. She did the right thing but WB11 lady slipped up.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obt-1d9POXM
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page