No-planers: I challenge you to explain how all the videos and photos....

Discussion in '9/11' started by LogicallyYours, Jun 23, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No-planers: I challenge you to explain how all the photos and videos were "faked"....how a plane was added, just the right size, the right angle, the right focus, the right direction of light source and the right focus to all those videos and photos WITHOUT the owners of those videos and photos exposing their property had been altered.

    AND THEN EXPLAIN how we on the ground saw the same very thing.
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,463
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You didnt see anything on the ground except your tv set. LOL

    lets see your video of what you saw, no video you saw nothing simple as that.


    [video=youtube;Rml2TL5N8ds]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds&feature=yo utu.be[/video]
     
  3. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can't answer it, huh? Not surprised.

    Oh, and for a quick $1000, tell me where I claimed to have taken a video. I bet you can't.
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,463
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    for a quick 100,000 bucks tell me ANY unedited original video of a plane impacting wtc 2 exists.

    millions of video cams and no one has an unhacked video, how can that be?

    Oh you? because no one believes you. Got a video so we know you are telling the truth?
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,463
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Several have been given to "ace" and he reneged. He's a liar and a coward.
     
  8. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Define "unkacked".


    your question is nonsense. You can't prove a negative. You ask it becuase, you can't prove any video has been faked so your need to frame your question so you can lose.

    I could care less if no one believes me. Eyewitnesses, such as myself, are living proof you don't know your ass from your elbow.

    Care you take the challenge again or do you want to keep running away?

     
  9. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are using arguments about HOW it was done to obfuscate
    the WHAT was done, the video record of the alleged "FLT175"
    can not possibly be real, on so many levels, the argument was
    presented that in the time between the port side wing contacting
    the wall and the starboard side wing contacting the wall, there was
    not time for the structure of the aircraft to respond to the asymmetrical stress,
    however there are high speed videos of airliner crash tests where things
    happen VERY fast in response to stress to the aircraft.

    The argument that the aircraft was traveling S00000 fast
    is simply not on, things do not take on special properties
    with speed alone, the example of a broom-straw imbedded
    in a post after storm winds sent it flying at high speed is one thing
    but remember, the straw had to have met the target bit straight on,
    not at an angle, and also broom-straws do not have wings.
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show your math to prove it can't be done.
     
  11. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are a pressupositionalist...you assume you know what happened so you try to make the evidence fit you assertions. That's not how science works. Science follows the evidence to where it leads. It stopped following you a long time ago.

    Second, unless you can prove HOW it was done, you can't prove it WAS done.

    You keep claiming laws of physics have to be broken...and then when asked you can't come up with those laws. Just admit it, you simply copied someone elses claims and you don't have the skill set to defend those claims.
     
  12. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Or quite possibly some people do not have the skill set to understand,
    its like this, the alleged "FLT175" struck the wall at an 11 degree angle,
    and had to decelerate upon impact ( the WTC wall was not made of paper )
    therefore it is a very safe bet that the aircraft was under far more stress than
    it was designed to handle, my figures show 28 g, the fact also of an asymmetrical
    distribution of force caused by that 11 deg angle begs the question, why didn't
    the wings break off?
     
  13. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why would they? Please post the math.

    Also, what is clear in the video is, the facade of the building is not offering the resistance you claim it would...which is completely validated by the visible damage left by the impact.
     
  14. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Yes, the money is missing from the bank, and unless we can prove who did it (and how), then the crime never occurred. More strange logic.
     
  15. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's a perfect comment. Now, prove the money is missing from the bank.
     
  16. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's empty. It wasn't yesterday when I was in there. I guess, hey, same thing with murder? In other words, the crime is only in getting caught, not the actual crime itself. That about right?
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Non sequitur...
     
  18. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why "non sequitur" Please explain.
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,463
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    they have to be unmodified original format yada yada.

    stop giving him hacked (*)(*)(*)(*) if you want to get paid.
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,463
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    unhacked is original right out of the camera without processing of any kind. yes you can tell.

    no its not nonsense, you mean you cant prove a negative, I do it all the time.

    sure 175 plane clips are super easy to prove that they are all hacked, even children are posting complaining about it, its so obvious.

    You seen it on tv!
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    just for my curiosity, were any of the videos posted on youtube
    or for that matter made available anyplace on the web?
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All of them.

    Google is your friend.
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,463
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    any of what videos? the ones hannibal is claiming ace should have accepted?
     
  24. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    oh yea, sorry about the incomplete post. I was looking to
    see the videos that were rejected by Ace,
    Just curious as to what may have been submitted for that reward.
     
  25. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh dont be silly everyone who was not within 1000 miles of the towers knows that it was swamp gas reflecting off Venus........or something like that
     

Share This Page