No-planers: I challenge you to explain how all the videos and photos....

Discussion in '9/11' started by LogicallyYours, Jun 23, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please define what the "jet into the cement" is?
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm guessing it's the comparative video you've been discussing.

    You are keeping up, aren't you?
    or?
     
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roll:
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    RE: accordion aircraft, you first brought up how crush-able the aluminum aircraft was and how the crushing should act as a shock absorber just like the crumple zones in cars, but then when I ask for elaboration, the topic shifts to some sort of secret code "jet into the cement" whatever that means and when I ask, all I get in answer is a ":roll:"
    whats up with that?
     
  5. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not if you guyz are going to create tangents
    written in secret code ...... what is up with the
    "jet into the cement" ?

    what is going on around here?
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can you support that with hard data as to how
    radio controlled detonators work?

    Also note my post #215 in this thread,
    it appears that by default, there are some individuals
    here who can not answer a simple question and by
    that make the statement that it was incorrect to have
    attempted to apply labels to one of my previous posts.
     
  7. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are generally agreed upon standards for everything
    ever hear of "Food Defect Action Level"? things like rat droppings
    in commercially prepared foods, can be measured and known to
    be at some PPM level and as long as its below a specified level,
    the food can be legally sold.

    In the case of controlled demolitions, there are agreed upon
    standards such that if a demolition job is done and leaves
    a few % of the building standing, its considered a successful
    demolition ( that is with agreement of the customer ..... )
    and that is the way these sorts of thing must by the very nature
    of physical systems work.
     
  8. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yup that's their evidence they know what happened. To funny a troll just made that same remark to me when I made the comment about the FBI having no evidence that Bin Laden was involved in the 911 attacks. Oh we know it was Al Qaeda we just had a hard time proving it but we know. :roflol: This is good stuff. Proof is pretty important when our sons and daughters are the ones being sent in harm's way, for me any way. Call me Johnny Cochrane, "if the gloves don't fit then you must acquit"
     
  9. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well put. When you actually look at 911 truth you can come to no other conclusion than the official lie is way out in left field.
    In the spirit of this thread. I was watching live on TV that morning. I was pretty sure I saw a plane hit the building, but I didn't see an impact video until years later. This is all news to me. So I can't say for sure but didn't David Copperfield make a building disappear with mirrors or some thing. I know the elite use magicians tricks to get people to agree with them, and in sense brainwash them with suggestive thinking. Watch the hands and the three wish's e.g.. everyone deserves heath care! We are going to create more jobs! We need tax cuts!
    By this time we are all nodding our heads yes. Then they motion with the left hand or both hands and say vote for me.
     
  10. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I was going to quote him Johnny! With one word "Troll"
     
  11. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    By raising the left hand it causes your right side of the brain to be activated. This was tested and proven on scanners. You start to day dream of those three wishes, and you believe that by voting for them you will get those 3 things we all want. Commercial's don't need hands they use images to activate the right side, most use the three wishes, e.g. you will get that girl! More power! Better mpg! Meanwhile feeding you images of sexy women and tires squealing and every one is impressed with the car.

    Once you know the techniques it is easy to see.:roll:
     
  12. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mirrors and magic. The apparent truther's area of expertise.
     
  13. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Scepticism an apparent brainwashed response. No worries Hoosier ignorance is bliss
     
  14. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You would know.
     
  15. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I'm rubber and you're glue
     
  16. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Amazing how truthers can just ignore the eye witnesses and come up with conspiracy theories.
     
  17. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What is amazing, is the plane at the Pentagon. That is amazing.
     
  18. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, the experts are the ones that weren't there and the one's that were there are just part of the conspiracy. Only the looney truthers could come up with that.
     
  19. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You are the air traffic control guy. Hoosier you weren't there dude. You know what you have been told. You haven't shown me any proof of your claims.

    When you use the word Looney you are expressing a brainwashed response. I won't spend much time on the hopelessly brainwashed slaves
     
  20. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "You weren't there dude", how prophetic. Yet you claim to be aware of more knowledge of those that were.
     
  21. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I'm more aware then you. I never said I knew more than those that were so why are you barking at me? I know why... that question is for you to figure out.
     
  22. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure you are, and yes, your statement pretty much insure you think you know more than those that were there.
     
  23. Private Citizen

    Private Citizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So indirectly you are saying you were there? BS you told me a week or two ago, your coworker was there, and they told you. That is why you are dancing around the question.

    - - - Updated - - -

    And that will end my wasted time
     
  24. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,031
    Likes Received:
    3,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    TOTALLY means TOTALLY in or out of demolitions.

    Your standards are not their standards and you are not using THEIR standards
     
  25. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Note that the NIST used the term "total collapse"
    and if then in this context what could "TOTAL" possibly mean?
    you are picking a nit. If I were to say " for all practical purposes the building was demolished " would that make any difference?
    the fact is that in order to achieve even 90% destruction of a building
    its a damn good trick and is difficult enough to achieve even when people are trying to get that result, however in the case of chaotic damage & fire achieving the result, and 3X on the same day, and you would rather chalk it up to "incredulity" rather than actually consider the evidence.

    or?
     

Share This Page