North Korea Threatens To Strike U.S. With 'Powerful Nuclear Hammer'

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Thirty6BelowZero, Jul 25, 2017.

  1. Thirty6BelowZero

    Thirty6BelowZero Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2015
    Messages:
    27,109
    Likes Received:
    11,629
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    http://www.newsweek.com/north-korea...eart-powerful-nuclear-hammer-honed-and-641482


    I've about had it with those ding dongs threatening us with their kids menu toys.... I hope they try this so we can wipe them out for good. That country is nothing but madness and evil and must be stopped. Another article I read about this had quoted one guy as stating that going to war with North Korea would be the bloodiest we've ever seen, with the most loss of life. Thoughts?
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2017
  2. Latherty

    Latherty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,989
    Likes Received:
    489
    Trophy Points:
    83
    They don't trust KJI to make an honest war, and are afraid that the public and soldiers would be mental nuts for killing and dying for him.

    The last time we were faced with this kind of dilemma was WWII Imperial Japan.
    Just sayin....

    But then they had a sane emperor who would respond to the loss of life of his own people.
     
  3. micfranklin

    micfranklin Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    17,729
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Any bets on how easily we can one-hit KO the North if he tries to go that route?
     
  4. Equality

    Equality Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2015
    Messages:
    1,903
    Likes Received:
    74
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yes they have gained the ability to send a ''missile'' further, but do we know they can arm this missile with nuclear warheads?
     
    Last edited: Jul 29, 2017
    ThorInc likes this.
  5. Texan

    Texan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,135
    Likes Received:
    4,710
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He is threatening to send nukes. I'm willing to take him at his word in this matter and not wait to find out.
     
  6. Fisherguy

    Fisherguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2016
    Messages:
    5,023
    Likes Received:
    3,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And you people were so easily fooled when Iraq made the same ridiculous claims...why does it always work on the same people? Do they believe in Leprechauns, as well?
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2017
    rcfoolinca288 likes this.
  7. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So then maybe we shouldn't try to over throw the government of their country. We don't threaten then with "regime change" no nuclear attack.

    ...oh, I'm sorry did you want to totally ignore the context of their "threat"?
     
  8. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He is threatening to send nukes IF WE ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW HIS GOVERNMENT.

    Context is your friend.
     
    highntight and rcfoolinca288 like this.
  9. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Whatshisface is not a Muslim, so he treasures his worthless precious life endless. So, he will not do anything which may jeopardize his grip on his little kingdom. He may talk big, but he will never ever launch nukes for he's not stupid and know what will be coming back at him.

    Simple as that. And Trump knows it.
     
  10. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Indeed he does. So?
     
  11. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There will not be a nuclear attack. He knows all about mutual destruction, and will do all he can to survive. his little kingdom is just too small to run and hide from immediate retaliation in kind. and live he wants.
     
  12. ararmer1919

    ararmer1919 Banned

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    8,605
    Likes Received:
    2,150
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why exactly would you take that chance?
     
  13. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So then let's not overthrow his government. We would react quite violently if a foreign power attempted to overthrow ours.
     
    highntight likes this.
  14. Fisherguy

    Fisherguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2016
    Messages:
    5,023
    Likes Received:
    3,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The key word being "attempted."
     
  15. rcfoolinca288

    rcfoolinca288 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2016
    Messages:
    14,301
    Likes Received:
    6,629
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The question is...what will China do if war does break out?

    Kim Idiot is talking a big game. It's like a Chihuahua that incessantly bark but can't/wont' bite.
     
  16. Fisherguy

    Fisherguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2016
    Messages:
    5,023
    Likes Received:
    3,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nobody is crazy enough to shoot one ICBM at America, which so far hasn't traveled what, a hundred miles? Let's see them hit a tiny atoll five thousand miles away, before singing, "We're on the eve of destruction." But, Republicans always have their investments with Raytheon, General Electric and others. They're always hungry for another needless trillion-dollar war.
     
  17. Mrlucky

    Mrlucky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    4,964
    Likes Received:
    3,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We have about 67,000 troops in the pacific, mostly stationed in South Korea, Japan and Guam. That number doesn't include navel forces on ships in the area. They could mostly be moved if war becomes eminent. South Korean though is a sitting duck. There are some 125,000 north Korean artillery pieces, capable of pummeling mostly civilians in Soul and any troops near the boarder. If North Korea launched an offensive, I don't think we would sacrifice many American troops and risk any ICBM's hitting our mainland now or ever. I think we would not hesitate to use tactical nukes. If that didn't stop them or bring China to stopping them before Russia got involved, we would probably launch a bigger ICBM to quiet them for good.
     
  18. One Mind

    One Mind Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Messages:
    20,296
    Likes Received:
    7,744
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So NK is no problem at all. Did all of you miss that most important little piece of pertinent info? It seems NK would only give us a dose nukes IF, IF, we tried to remove their supreme ruler. You know, like we have a history of doing to middle eastern nations, and even a few covertly by our CIA in south and central America? So then, if we leave Kim alone, do not try to remove him, invade NK, KIM will keep his nukes in their tubes. Hey, sounds like one hellva deal to me!!! Only a madman would not take him up on that offer.
     
  19. Mrlucky

    Mrlucky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    4,964
    Likes Received:
    3,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They have been playing that game with us for at least 30 years. They rattle a small sword and each time, we pay them off with a couple billion in aid. The difference now is that Kim has become ICBM capable and should soon have the ability to fit a nuke to one or more that could hit the US. There may be a year or less before a decision needs to made on the best way to deal with Kim. I doubt it will be passively.
     
  20. Fisherguy

    Fisherguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2016
    Messages:
    5,023
    Likes Received:
    3,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe they'll put a big rock on the end of their missile, like Iraq did with one of their last Scud missiles. You know, the ones that were supposed to hit the U.S. but can only fly at most 430 miles. Fat Kim likes his Scotch too much to start a shooting match. We can smother them with a hundred nukes and what will that get him? Life in a cave with crates of food and hand-picked women?
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2017
  21. Mrlucky

    Mrlucky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    4,964
    Likes Received:
    3,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For now Kim may be able to choose his destiny. If China slaps him upside the head, we might not need to. Either way, with Iran screwing around, we will probably need to take North Korea out of the picture first. Only taking Kim, their krazy leader out would not accomplish that.
     
  22. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    China has no reason to act on behalf of the United States. Russia has reason to sell N.K and Iran the missiles and technical means for nuclear weapons miniaturization - which the US military industrial complex would LOVE to happen as it would justify trillions in profits to them to counter act it.

    Why would China act on our behalf? Why should they care what threats Kim poises to the USA, S. Korea or Japan? China does not share the "put your country last" views of the American left.

    The reason for S. Korea and Japan to not have nuclear weapons is gone. If the left is a-ok with Kim and N.K. having nuclear weapons and missiles, they certainly should be fine with S. Korea and Japan having them too.

    In fact, since the left claims that the proven sociopathic mass murderer and torturer Kim poises no danger of using nuclear weapons and missiles, no reason for every country not to have them.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2017
  23. EMTdaniel86

    EMTdaniel86 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,380
    Likes Received:
    4,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This week he is. But that will change. That is NK's MO
     
  24. Labouroflove

    Labouroflove Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    12,838
    Likes Received:
    6,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kindergarten. I'm fairly sure KJI attended in some form, probably read "The Little Engine that Could" as well. You should too.
     
  25. Labouroflove

    Labouroflove Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    12,838
    Likes Received:
    6,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NK has a nuclear rock.
     

Share This Page