NSA, GCHQ, w/tech giants have cracked encryption and destroyed privacy (NEW INFO-9/5)

unskewedewd · Sep 5, 2013

And now, for something completely different, (than the middle east)
[video=youtube;FGK8IC-bGnU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGK8IC-bGnU[/video]

(the bottom line, in case it it's too small for you, reads: "Truth is only Treason in the Empire of Lies")
-------------------------------------------------------------------
A thorough and revealing joint piece written in partnership between the NYT, Pro Publica and the Guardian:

US and UK spy agencies defeat privacy and security on the internet

NSA and GCHQ unlock encryption used to protect emails, banking and medical records
$250m-a-year US program works covertly with tech companies to insert weaknesses into products
Security experts say programs 'undermine the fabric of the internet'

Through covert partnerships with tech companies, the spy agencies have inserted secret vulnerabilities into encryption software.

---------
(This story has been reported in partnership between the New York Times, the Guardian and ProPublica based on documents obtained by the Guardian.

For the Guardian: James Ball, Julian Borger, Glenn Greenwald
For the New York Times: Nicole Perlroth, Scott Shane
For ProPublica: Jeff Larson
Read the New York Times story here)

US and British intelligence agencies have successfully cracked much of the online encryption relied upon by hundreds of millions of people to protect the privacy of their personal data, online transactions and emails, according to top-secret documents revealed by former contractor Edward Snowden.

The files show that the National Security Agency and its UK counterpart GCHQ have broadly compromised the guarantees that internet companies have given consumers to reassure them that their communications, online banking and medical records would be indecipherable to criminals or governments.

The agencies, the documents reveal, have adopted a battery of methods in their systematic and ongoing assault on what they see as one of the biggest threats to their ability to access huge swathes of internet traffic "the use of ubiquitous encryption across the internet".

Those methods include covert measures to ensure NSA control over setting of international encryption standards, the use of supercomputers to break encryption with "brute force", and the most closely guarded secret of all collaboration with technology companies and internet service providers themselves.

Through these covert partnerships, the agencies have inserted secret vulnerabilities known as backdoors or trapdoors into commercial encryption software.

The files, from both the NSA and GCHQ, were obtained by the Guardian, and the details are being published today in partnership with the New York Times and ProPublica. They reveal:

A 10-year NSA program against encryption technologies made a breakthrough in 2010 which made "vast amounts" of data collected through internet cable taps newly "exploitable".

The NSA spends $250m a year on a program which, among other goals, works with technology companies to "covertly influence" their product designs.

The secrecy of their capabilities against encryption is closely guarded, with analysts warned: "Do not ask about or speculate on sources or methods."

The NSA describes strong decryption programs as the "price of admission for the US to maintain unrestricted access to and use of cyberspace".

A GCHQ team has been working to develop ways into encrypted traffic on the "big four" service providers, named as Hotmail, Google, Yahoo and Facebook.

Click to expand...

This quote is a small breakdown of what the Guardian and the NYTimes (article linked within the quote) have revealed and shouldn't be taken as a comprehensive synopsis.

Everyone who uses the internet should read the full articles (THAT MEANS YOU!)

Go ahead, take a break from the manufactured distractions that've been so prevalent recently in the media and discussion forums like this, and digest some more outrageous police state shenanigans being perpetrated by the country that claims to be "The Land Of The Free" and its allies while lying to you about how quickly the noose is tightening and the motivations for tying it in the first place. They're truly turning the internet into the world wide web:

moon · Sep 6, 2013

And now, for something completely different, (than the middle east)
Click to expand...

It isn't really a different matter . This unacceptable behaviour on the part of our own governments and their agencies is stimulated by the Culture Wars which the West has started in its blind support for its all-time major geopolitical gaff....Israel. It seems to me that anybody who objects to this slavery which the ' security ' agencies intend to inflict upon us all needs to identify how best to fight back. In my opinion the best way to focus- the best way to concentrate resources and change the course of our corrupt governments and their agencies is to defeat the forces of Zionism - in all its forms- which exist within our respective societies. Making this information public is a challenge to those forces and an announcement that they are not going to get things all their own way. However, even those media outlets which want to defend our liberties have admitted, in this article, that they have been forced to redact information before publishing . That's not a good sign.

Is the term ' forces of Zionism ' just some conspiratorial nonsense intended as a swipe at jews ? No, it isn't. Zionism is not the preserve of jews at all . There are many people with a vested interest in the geopolitical success of Zionism and their numbers dwarf those of the jews involved. This isn't about any narrow sectarian issue, although Zionists and their supporters depend upon that aspect for their propaganda. It's grown far, far beyond any such minor concerns to become a full-blown war between the military-industrial complex and ourselves, the world's ordinary citizenry. If you look around at the chaos which exists in the Middle East - and to some extent the battlefields of Africa- you'll see that our enemies are winning. Having them granted unrestricted access to everything you write or say is just another aspect of their assault on the concepts of liberty and free speech.

moon · Sep 6, 2013

Of course, that doesn't mean that the disastrous implementation of the doctrine of Zionism is responsible for all of the worlds woes. I'm simply stating that defeating it should be a focal point for our counter-attack . Otherwise we'll all firing blindly and every which-way into the night. When justice in the Middle East is seen to be done then the agents of the surveillance industries which threaten us now will lose much of their support and traction.

moon · Sep 6, 2013

FBI adds Syrian Electronic Army to wanted list

http://rt.com/usa/fbi-adds-sea-wanted-list-484/
Click to expand...

Those who want to strip you of your privacy and self-respect would like your assistance in imprisoning its opposition.

waltky · Nov 25, 2015

Should the gov't. have the ability to track terrorists and drug dealers?...

Why Government, Tech Can't Agree About Encryption
November 24, 2015 Your phone is getting better and better at protecting your privacy. But Uncle Sam isn't totally comfortable with that, because it's also complicating the work of tracking criminals and potential national-security threats.

For decades, tech companies have steadily expanded the use of encryption a data-scrambling technology that shields information from prying eyes, whether it's sent over the Internet or stored on phones and computers. For almost as long, police and intelligence agencies have sought to poke holes in the security technology, which can thwart investigators even when they have a legal warrant for, say, possibly incriminating text messages stored on a phone. The authorities haven't fared well; strong encryption now keeps strangers out of everything from your iMessages to app data stored on the latest Android phones. But in the wake of the Paris attacks, U.S. officials are again pushing for limits on encryption, even though there's still no evidence the extremists used it to safeguard their communications.

Reasonable concerns on both sides

While various experts are exploring ways of resolving the impasse, none are making much headway. For now, the status quo favors civil libertarians and the tech industry, although that could change quickly for instance, should another attack lead to mass U.S. casualties. Such a scenario could stampede Congress into passing hasty and potentially counterproductive restrictions on encryption. There are completely reasonable concerns on both sides,'' said Yeshiva University law professor Deborah Pearlstein. The aftermath of an attack, however, is the least practical time to have a rational discussion about these issues.

Silicon Valley pioneer and Silent Circle co-founder Jon Callas holds up Blackphone with encryption apps displayed on it at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California.

Encryption plays a little heralded yet crucial role in the modern economy and daily life. It protects everything from corporate secrets to the credit-card numbers of online shoppers to the communications of democracy advocates fighting totalitarian regimes. At the same time, recent decisions by Apple and Google to encrypt smartphone data by default have rankled law enforcement officials, who complain of growing difficulty in getting access to the data they feel they need to build criminal cases and prevent attacks. For months, the Obama administration which has steered away from legislative restrictions on encryption has been in talks with technology companies to brainstorm ways of giving investigators legal access to encrypted information.

Exploratory search for options
Click to expand...

Fallen · Nov 25, 2015

moon said: ↑

Those who want to strip you of your privacy and self-respect would like your assistance in imprisoning its opposition.
Click to expand...

I don't get why this is allowed by the public. I could see some people being blackmailed by the government in the future.

Belch · Nov 25, 2015

Which is where open source software comes into play. You can bribe businesses to put back doors into their encryption software, but open source means that the code can be read by all. If there is a back door, it will be as obvious as a moose taking a dump on your front lawn.

waltky · Apr 7, 2016

Obama not onboard to hack terrorists encryption...

Exclusive: White House declines to support encryption legislation - sources
Wed Apr 6, 2016 | WASHINGTON - The White House is declining to offer public support for draft legislation that would empower judges to require technology companies such as Apple Inc to help law enforcement crack encrypted data, sources familiar with the discussions said.

The decision all but assures that the years-long political impasse over encryption will continue even in the wake of the high-profile effort by the Department of Justice to force Apple to break into an iPhone used by a gunman in last December's shootings in San Bernardino, California. President Obama suggested in remarks last month that he had come around to the view that law enforcement agencies needed to have a way to gain access to encrypted information on smartphones. But the administration remains deeply divided on the issue, the sources said.

A worker checks an iPhone in a repair store in New York

The draft legislation from Senators Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein, the Republican chair and top Democrat respectively of the Senate Intelligence Committee, is expected to be introduced as soon as this week. The bill gives federal judges broad authority to order tech companies to help the government but does not spell out what companies might have to do or the circumstances under which they could be ordered to help, according to sources familiar with the text. It also does not create specific penalties for noncompliance. Although the White House has reviewed the text and offered feedback, it is expected to provide minimal public input, if any, the sources said.

Its stance is partly a reflection of a political calculus that any encryption bill would be controversial and is unlikely to go far in a gridlocked Congress during an election year, sources said. A White House spokesman declined to comment on the pending legislation, but referred to White House press secretary Josh Earnest's statements on encryption legislation. Last month Earnest said the administration is "skeptical" of lawmakers' ability to resolve the encryption debate given their difficulty in tackling "simple things." Tech companies and civil liberties advocates have opposed encryption legislation, arguing that mandating law enforcement access to tech products will undermine security for everyone. Several lawmakers, including U.S. Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, a Democrat, have vowed to oppose any attempt to limit encryption protections in U.S. technology products.

MORE
Click to expand...

Destroyer of illusions · Apr 7, 2016

Jim Rockford · Apr 7, 2016

Time to send scrambled meaningless e-mails by the thousands every day. Drown the info takers in nonsense.

waltky · Apr 9, 2016

The FBI-Apple iPhone encryption case goes on...

Justice Department still needs Apple's help unlocking Brooklyn iPhone
April 8, 2016 -- Even though federal investigators were able to unlock the iPhone used by shooters in the San Bernardino, Calif., massacre, the Justice Department is still seeking help from Apple to read data on a phone involved in an ongoing case in Brooklyn, N.Y.

The Justice Department on Friday submitted a letter to a judge in New York again pressing its case against Apple in a 2014 drug investigation. Judge James Orenstein previously ruled the government lacks the power to compel Apple to write software to open the phone. The Justice Department is now seeking a higher judge to review the matter. In his ruling in February, Orenstein said federal prosecutors overstepped the authority given it in the All Writs Act, a law written in 1789. Jun Feng, the defendant who used the phone, pleaded guilty but both sides agreed a resolution to the legal dispute involving the phone is needed.

The Brooklyn case has received relatively little attention, overshadowed by the fight over the locked cellphone of Syed Farook, the alleged gunman in San Bernardino. Investigators said they were stalled by their inability to proceed past the phone's security passcode. The Justice Department sought a court order forcing Apple to write software for opening the phone, but quickly dropped its legal battle after an unidentified third party offered the FBI a method of opening the phone.

Apple contended that acquiescing to a government demand to open a cellphone would create future issues regarding security and privacy. FBI Director James Comey said Thursday his agency purchased "a tool" to open Farook's phone, an Apple iPhone 5C, and successfully entered Farook's phone, but added the solution does not work on more advanced smartphones such as the Apple iPhone 5s, or iPhone 6 models.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016...-iPhone/1061460133748/?spt=mps&or=4&sn=tn_int
Click to expand...

See also:

U.S. to continue appeal of iPhone data case in New York
Fri Apr 8, 2016 - The U.S. Justice Department on Friday said it would keep fighting to force Apple Inc to open an iPhone in a New York drug case, continuing its controversial effort to require Apple and other tech companies to help law enforcement authorities circumvent encryption.

Just two weeks ago, the government dropped its effort to require Apple to crack an iPhone used by one of the shooters in the December attacks in San Bernardino, California, saying it had unlocked the phone without Apple's help. Some observers thought the government would back away from the New York case too, since the suspect has already pleaded guilty. But in a letter filed in federal court in Brooklyn, New York, the Justice Department said, "The government continues to require Apple's assistance in accessing the data that it is authorized to search by warrant."

An Apple attorney said Friday the company was disappointed but not surprised that the government would continue to fight in New York after giving up in California. He said the appeal belied the FBI's claim that the San Bernardino case was about a single phone and the need to stop future terror acts. Apple, with the strong support of most of the technology industry, argues that requiring it to circumvent the encryption in its own products would inevitability open the door for hackers and foreign spies and undermine security for everyone. The company has said it is willing to take the issue to the Supreme Court.

The phones in the two cases have different security features, with the New York phone running an earlier version of the iPhone operating software. The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, James Comey, who is leading the battle against Apple, said Thursday that the method used on the San Bernardino phone would not work on other models.

MORE
Click to expand...

Related:

U.S. judge in Boston ordered Apple to help law enforcement examine iPhone
Fri Apr 8, 2016 A U.S. magistrate judge in Boston in February ordered Apple Inc to assist law enforcement officers in examining the iPhone of an alleged gang member, according to a court filing unsealed on Friday.

"Reasonable technical assistance consists of, to the extent possible, extracting data from the device, copying the data from the device onto an external hard drive or other storage medium and returning the aforementioned storage medium to law enforcement," U.S. Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler wrote.

A worker checks an iPhone in a repair store in New York

Apple has been under pressure in recent months to assist law enforcement agencies in searching its iPhones after the U.S. Justice Department sought access to a phone used by a gunman who fatally shot 14 people in San Bernardino, California, in December. The FBI has since said it has figured out a secret method for unlocking iPhones.

Apple objected to the Boston order on the same grounds as it did in the San Bernardino case, an Apple employee briefed on the matter said, and the government did not pursue the matter in this case.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-a...0X52GU?mod=related&channelName=technologyNews
Click to expand...

NMNeil · Apr 9, 2016

Remember a sort time ago the FBI taking Apple to court to force them to unlock one of their phones, then the FBI laughed and said "Don't bother, we cracked it"?
Seems like they are not as good as they try and make us believe.

http://news.sky.com/story/1675431/fbi-wants-apple-to-unlock-drug-dealers-iphone

The worrying thing is the dealer had plead guilty, so there is no need to go into the phone, but the FBI still want the backdoor for all phones opened.

Jim Rockford · Apr 9, 2016

NMNeil said: ↑

Remember a sort time ago the FBI taking Apple to court to force them to unlock one of their phones, then the FBI laughed and said "Don't bother, we cracked it"?
Seems like they are not as good as they try and make us believe.

http://news.sky.com/story/1675431/fbi-wants-apple-to-unlock-drug-dealers-iphone

The worrying thing is the dealer had plead guilty, so there is no need to go into the phone, but the FBI still want the backdoor for all phones opened.
Click to expand...

This is correct. The FBI will bring this case up in all 50 States. They will find a sym(pathetic) judge somewhere. And Apple will go bankrupt trying to fight all the duplicate suits. The FBI has the time , the money and the judges in pocket. Apple will get (*)(*)(*)(*)ed out of existence for its resistance to King Obama and Big Brother.

waltky · Apr 13, 2016

Senate encryption bill not looked upon favorably...

Analysts Find Little to Like in Senate Encryption Measure
April 12, 2016 | WASHINGTON One of the most anticipated pieces of cybersecurity legislation took a step forward late last week in the U.S. Congress, but most analysts have not been kind to the new measure. The Hill newspaper published a discussion draft of the bill from Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) and Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), who head the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

Discussion drafts are often short on detail, this one only nine pages in length, but they provide valuable insights into the priorities of its authors and the key principles they seek to establish. The bill would require covered entities, including digital device manufacturers, software manufacturers, electronic communication services ... or "any person who provides a product to comply with court orders seeking access to information or data in an intelligible format or assistance necessary to obtain such data. That could cover many thousands of individuals as well as private tech companies, and includes emails, texts, contacts or any other information stored and shared digitally, an expansive definition.

George Washington University Distinguished Research Professor in Computer Science Lance Hoffman, who founded the school's Cyberspace Security Policy and Research Institute, says "Its way too vague, there's too few safeguards, and I don't think there's any consequences enumerated if a covered entity doesnt follow the law." Hoffman says, "Worse though, is where it gets down to covered entities, well that could be anybody. It might even apply to any individual who happens to use an app that obscures data in any fashion." Susan Hennessey, a Fellow in National Security in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution says the bill "creates a generalized obligation for...covered entities...to preserve some ability to access communications. Thats sort of the formalized back door that Silicon Valley has always warned about.'

WhatsApp and Facebook app icons on a smartphone in New York. WhatsApp says it's now using a powerful form of encryption to protect the security of photos, videos, group chats and voice calls in addition to text messages sent by more than a billion users around the globe.

Ross Schulman, senior counsel with New Americas Open Technology Institute says the bill mandates, "Thou shalt do this, but doesnt grapple with any of the difficult questions of how one actually goes about doing it." But Hennessey says the bill "preserves the kind of flexibility that legislation around technology needs to preserve." She told VOA the bill is tethered to responding to court orders and is not a limitless mandate, but a clarification of Congress' expectations regarding encryption. "This is in some respects what Apple and others have been calling for: a decision from Congress, not the FBI resorting to the All Writs Act. So Congress is saying: we have decided, and this is our expectation.," Hennessey says.

Schulman tells VOA the authors of the bill "didnt do a whole lot of hard work to think about the implications. It would make illegal whole swathes of the infrastructure that weve painstakingly put in place over the last 25 years to make the Internet a secure place to live and do business." Hoffman adds, "Theres little doubt this bill would certainly inhibit innovation in the United States." "What I would say to members of Congress is first, do no harm. Dont mess up something that's given the U.S. great advantages and continues to do so. What you really need is a solid risk analysis: an examination of the webs architecture, its functioning, and the consequences of any new regulatory action," Hoffman told VOA. "If you change the Internets architecture, you might be able to build a stronger, more secure system, but it would be a lot less useful.

MORE
Click to expand...

waltky · Apr 25, 2016

Granny says, "Dat's right - it's all Snowden's fault...

Snowden leaks accelerated encryption technology by 7 years, U.S. intelligence chief says
April 25, 2016 - "From our standpoint, its not a good thing," Clapper said of accelerated advancements in encryption technology.

Whistle-blower Edward Snowden, by leaking classified data two years ago, contributed to the acceleration of sophisticated encryption methods that militants are using to hide their communications, National Intelligence Director James Clapper said Monday. The rapid advancement of commercially available encryption software is proving to be a difficult obstacle in detecting potential threats, he said at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. "From our standpoint, it's not a good thing," he said of the rapidly advancing encryption, adding that the software has had "profound effects" on the government's ability to gather intelligence.

Clapper, a retired Air Force lieutenant general who took over the DNI post after Navy Adm. Dennis Blair was dismissed by President Barack Obama in 2010, called the Islamic State "the most sophisticated user of the Internet," continuing to use evolving software for end-to-end encryption of its activities. And the National Security Agency believes Snowden, who exposed the agency's massive phone surveillance program in 2014, has helped accelerate encryption technology by about seven years, Clapper said.

In his remarks, Clapper acknowledged that there needs to be a balance between intelligence capabilities and guarding against law enforcement invasions of privacy -- echoing Obama's prior statements against "absolutist positions" on the matter. Clapper called the balance a "holy grail" the U.S. intelligence agency is seeking. Clapper cited ongoing terror threats and efforts in Europe as factors that favor intelligence sharing and sources that have shed new light on the Islamic State's operational strategies.

Click to expand...

waltky · Aug 8, 2016

Encryption hinders law enforcement investigations...

FBI Chief: Encryption Prevented Access to 650 Electronic Devices in Past 10 Months
August 5, 2016 The FBI's director said Friday the agency is collecting data to present next year in hopes of sparking a national conversation about law enforcement's increasing inability to access encrypted electronic devices.

Speaking Friday at the American Bar Association annual conference in San Francisco, James Comey said the agency was unable to access 650 of 5,000 electronic devices investigators attempted to search over the last 10 months. He said the problem is only going to get worse without a discussion about the technology. Comey says encryption technology makes it impossible in a growing number of criminal cases to search electronic devices. But he said it's up to U.S. citizens, rather than the FBI or government officials, to decide whether to modify the technology to help law enforcement access the devices.

Comey's concern with encryption emerged earlier this year when the FBI engaged in a high-profile legal fight with Apple over accessing data from a locked iPhone used by one of the two shooters in the San Bernardino, California, terrorist attack. The legal fight remained unresolved because the FBI dropped its court challenge after it said it found a way to access the shooter's iPhone. Silicon Valley companies say encryption safeguards customers' privacy rights and offers protections from hackers, corporate spies and other breaches. "The San Bernardino litigation was necessary, but in my view, it was also counterproductive," Comey said during his 20-minute speech. "It was necessary because we had to get into that phone. It was counterproductive because it made it very hard to have a complex conversation."

Comey said he hopes a calmer conversation about encryption and its effects on public safety can be started in 2017 after the presidential elections pitting Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton. Comey chided Clinton on July 5 for being "extremely careless" in using private email servers for government communications while serving as secretary of state, but he recommended no criminal charges. On Friday, in response to a question about the decision, Comey said, "I don't want to talk about the case itself anymore, after four hours and 40 minutes without a bathroom break" testifying before Congress about the FBI's investigation of Clinton's email practices while secretary of state. But he said that it was "unprecedented for the FBI to show the kind of transparency" it did in discussing its investigation of Clinton and recommendation to prosecutors to forgo criminal charges.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/fbi-chief-calls-national-talk-over-encryption-vs-safety
Click to expand...

waltky · Nov 15, 2016

Terrorist and drug cartel sympathizers ask Trump to protect encryption...

U.S. internet firms ask Trump to support encryption, ease regulations
November 14, 2016 | WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. internet companies including Facebook Inc and Amazon Inc have sent President-elect Donald Trump a detailed list of their policy priorities, which includes promoting strong encryption, immigration reform and maintaining liability protections from content that users share on their platforms.

The letter sent on Monday by the Internet Association, a trade group whose 40 members also include Alphabet's Google, Uber [UBER.UL] and Twitter, represents an early effort to repair the relationship between the technology sector and Trump, who was almost universally disliked and at times denounced in Silicon Valley during the presidential campaign. The internet industry looks forward to engaging in an open and productive dialogue, reads the letter, signed by Michael Beckerman, president of the Internet Association, and seen by Reuters.

Some of the policy goals stated in the letter may align with Trumps priorities, including easing regulation on the sharing economy, lowering taxes on profits made from intellectual property and applying pressure on Europe to not erect too many barriers that restrict U.S. internet companies from growing in that market. Other goals are likely to clash with Trump, who offered numerous broadsides against the tech sector during his campaign.

They include supporting strong encryption in products against efforts by law enforcement agencies to mandate access to data for criminal investigations, upholding recent reforms to U.S. government surveillance programs that ended the bulk collection of call data by the National Security Agency, and maintaining net neutrality rules that require internet service providers to treat web traffic equally. The association seeks immigration reform to support more high-skilled workers staying in the United States. Though Trump made tougher immigration policies a central theme of his campaign, he has at times shied away from arguing against more H-1B visas for skilled workers, saying in a March debate he was "softening the position because we need to have talented people in this country."

While urging support for trade agreements, the letter does not mention the Trans Pacific Partnership, which Trump has repeatedly assailed with claims it was poorly negotiated and would take jobs away from U.S. workers. The technology sector supported the deal, but members of Congress have conceded since the election it is not going to be enacted. Trump's often-shifting policy proposals on the campaign trail frequently alarmed tech companies and sometimes elicited public mockery, such as when Trump called for closing off parts of the internet to limit militant Islamist propaganda.

Trump has also urged a boycott of Apple Inc products over the company's refusal to help the Federal Bureau of Investigation unlock an iPhone associated with last year's San Bernardino, California, shootings, threatened antitrust action against Amazon, and demanded that tech companies such as Apple manufacture their products in the United States. In a statement, Beckerman said the internet industry looked forward to working closely with Trump and lawmakers in Congress to "cement the internets role as a driver of economic and social progress for future generations."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-intern...ncryption-ease-200356505--finance.html?ref=gs
Click to expand...

Log in or Sign up

NSA, GCHQ, w/tech giants have cracked encryption and destroyed privacy (NEW INFO-9/5)

unskewedewd New Member

Attached Files:

NSA-diagram-001.jpg

black-widow-spider.jpg

moon Well-Known Member

moon Well-Known Member

moon Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Fallen Well-Known Member

Belch Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Destroyer of illusions Banned

Jim Rockford Banned

waltky Well-Known Member

NMNeil Well-Known Member

Jim Rockford Banned

waltky Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

NSA, GCHQ, w/tech giants have cracked encryption and destroyed privacy (NEW INFO-9/5)

unskewedewd New Member

Attached Files:

NSA-diagram-001.jpg

black-widow-spider.jpg

moon Well-Known Member

moon Well-Known Member

moon Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Fallen Well-Known Member

Belch Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Destroyer of illusions Banned

Jim Rockford Banned

waltky Well-Known Member

NMNeil Well-Known Member

Jim Rockford Banned

waltky Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches