NYT casts doubt on Israel’s claims Gaza hospital attack

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by notme, Oct 26, 2023.

  1. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah. You say this, while I got the NYT in the OP saying the missile was shot from a site run by the IDF's Iron dome program. It was the only missile around that anybody sees on the vids. The only thing the NYT doesn't know is what kind of missile Israel shot. But big deal. Them are the facts, not seeing you dispute a thing.
     
  2. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why hasn't Hamas provided the missile parts so people can examine it?
     
  3. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think they are a bit busy fighting war criminals.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2023
  4. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think you mean dishonest and lazy.
     
  5. Irie

    Irie Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    And yet you ignored my quote from that very article that says you claim of "proof" is Bull shart....you are dismissed.
     
  6. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,908
    Likes Received:
    27,428
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They're not fighting the Russians, silly.
     
  7. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nonsense.
    By not knowing what Israel shot, still means the NYT still points at Israel that they shot something.
    By citing the Israeli military that it may or may not have gone over the border, it doesn't mean it did not go over the border.

    You're just twisting facts on this.
     
  8. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah. Depriving millions of civilians of clean water, food, electricity, and medical aid... it still means Israel makes war crimes.
    Disproportionally blowing up all them civilian housing: war crime
    Collonies in the west bank: war crime
     
  9. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Most IDF are not involved in any of this. Especially not reservists.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2023
  10. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I oppose the Gaza blockade. It has failed.

    But condemn all IDF as war criminals that deserve to die? That's some satanic Islamist **** that I can't agree with.
     
  11. Irie

    Irie Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Someone (meaning you) should have eaten much fewer lead based paint chips back in the day.....ahhhh....what could have been...
     
    Ronstar likes this.
  12. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not seeing any kind of an argument disputing anything I wrote. You're just replying with a personal insult and so show that you're conceding. Thanks.
     
  13. Irie

    Irie Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah, go with that.
    Oy vey....
     
    Ronstar likes this.
  14. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Indeed. I be going with the OP saying it was an Israeli missile where Israel lied it wasn't theirs.
    An Israeli missile going in a straight line towards the hospital.

    A hospital Israel threatened to evacuate or be bombed.
    Israel who previously bombed hospitals.
    mesjogge
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2023
  15. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How cute, as you wrote the OP.
     
    Irie likes this.
  16. DEFinning

    DEFinning Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2020
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Now that's an interesting theory, I hadn't heard. You didn't come up with that on your own, did you? Can you offer a link?
     
  17. Irie

    Irie Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    OmG...that's some classic sh*t right there...
     
  18. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sure sure... I quoted things from the article, and put it in the OP.
    The text there isn't really my creation, by copy pasting. But hey.
    I'll accept being the cute one.
     
  19. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,944
    Likes Received:
    8,889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just my own theory based on various reported observations being:
    1: we see a rocket launched in Gaza.
    2: few seconds later we see a small explosion of light in the sky
    3: reports of seeing that object in the sky appear to reverse direction
    4: the hospital large explosion

    Point on 1: we see the exhaust flame straight after launch then extinguishes = no more fuel = now running under gravity.

    Point on 2: intercept with dome rocket

    Point of 3: The Gazan rocket blown up. The object reported in reverse was actually part of the dome rocket carrying on in the same direction. The dome rockets have enough fuel to launch to a distance of 70km, it's only travelled about 4km

    Point on 4: explosion caused by the dome rocket excess fuel

    We saw similar reports during the first gulf war. Much of the damage in Israel said to be from scud missiles was actually caused by patriot missiles, either from bits of that missile after it exploded in the sky or the missile completely missing the scud and exploding on the ground
     
    DEFinning likes this.
  20. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It could have been the Iron Dome itself firing at the hospital. In a previous war Israel used white phosphorus to rain down on a residential area. To use WP like that, is using it as a WMD and is forbidden, but they did it anyways. Israel flat out denied it was WP while the picture of it was making it REAL obvious that Israel was lying. The lying went on for like 3 weeks before they admitted to it. And THAT'S how Israel reacts when it's crystal clear that they are lying.

    I'll be guessing that this is the part where NYT says, we know there was something flying that came from Israel. They put up where it originated from. They put up where you can see a blast. We can all see it's in a rathe straight path towards the hospital. NYT does also say they don't know what is flying. And that leaves room open to all kinds of weapons.
     
  21. DEFinning

    DEFinning Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2020
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you are assuming that the Iron Dome rockets can destroy a Palestinian rocket, cause it to explode, without blowing up, themselves? I have to admit, it seems plausible, and a neat bit of out of the box thinking. The way that I'd previously heard it analyzed, all the unspent fuel was from Islamic Jihad's North Korean rocket. But if those don't have as much fuel as the Iron Dome rockets-- where did you get information on these two things?-- then, kudos, on your clever theory!
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2023
  22. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,944
    Likes Received:
    8,889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not quite. I'm thinking that the dome rocket did explode in the vicinity of the target rocket but did not completely destroy itself giving rise to part of the dome rocket plus excess fuel to continue in the same direction onwards to the hospital. I'm skeptical on the Israeli claim that the other rocket was North Korean which came out at the same time as the release of the fake audio. The dome uses Tamir rockets which have a range upto 70km so would have carried excess fuel. I don't know the spec of NK rockets but unguided Gazan rockets do not carry excess fuel.
     
  23. GlobalCitizen

    GlobalCitizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    8,330
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The NYT already has proven to me they have a side.
     
  24. Irie

    Irie Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    "The Time's finding does not answer what actually did cause the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital blast, or who is responsible."


    You lie.
     
  25. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As if I would ever care about your opinion when you bring nothing on the table disputing their research.
     

Share This Page