Obama's Alter Ego

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Wehrwolfen, Mar 20, 2014.

  1. Wehrwolfen

    Wehrwolfen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,350
    Likes Received:
    5,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    By Jan LaRue
    March 20, 2014

    Which President Obama appears at the White House podium depends on whether the incident du jour is commendable or condemnable.

    If it’s a star-spangled victory by America’s magnificent military, such as the Navy SEALs killing Osama bin Laden, Obama becomes the reincarnation of Chester W. Nimitz, Admiral of the Pacific Fleet, fully informed and in command.

    If it’s a scandal involving willful deceit and/or incompetence, Obama becomes the know-nothing Sgt. Schultz of the ‘60s TV sitcom “Hogan’s Heroes.”

    On March 16, a team of Navy SEALs seized a commercial oil tanker in the Mediterranean Sea that had been hijacked by three armed Libyan rebels. On March 17, the U.S. Department of Defense issued a press release announcing that Obama had approved the operation at the request of the governments of Libya and Cypress. According to the DOD:

    “The Morning Glory is carrying a cargo of oil owned by the Libyan government National Oil Company. The ship and its cargo were illicitly obtained from the Libyan port of As-Sidra. The Morning Glory will be underway soon to a port in Libya with a team of sailors from the USS Stout (DDG-55) embarked. The sailors will be supervising the transit.”​


    When Navy SEALs took out Osama bin Laden, Obama announced it from the splendor of the White House East Room. One has to wonder why Obama didn’t personally wrap himself in the “morning glory” of the SEALs’ latest successful mission instead of a one-liner in a DOD statement.

    Could it be that a statement involving Libya from the White House or Department of State would raise more vexing questions about the absence of Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during the terrorist attack on our Benghazi consulate and compound on Sept. 11, 2012? Or their failure to increase security there as urgently and repeatedly requested by our ambassador?

    Could it be that a statement involving Libya from the White House or Department of State would raise more vexing questions about the absence of Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during the terrorist attack on our Benghazi consulate and compound on Sept. 11, 2012? Or their failure to increase security there as urgently and repeatedly requested by our ambassador?

    [Excerpt]

    Read more:
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/03/obamas_alter_ego.html

    Why the lies coming from both Obama and Hillary for two weeks after 9/11/12 and now the stonewalling of the investigation?. A year and a half has gone by and not one arrest or truth coming from this administration or the "investigation". Are we to believe the perpetrators of this Attack are ghosts?
     

Share This Page