obamas birth certificate here....

Discussion in 'Other/Miscellaneous' started by groupthink, Aug 16, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    nothing to do with sanity rahl. people have been tricked or lied to by presidents before. this one's extra special.
     
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course sanity has something to do with it. Every single piece of evidence confirms his birth in hawaii.
     
  3. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    we disagree on that, this is America. and probably on the benghazi affair.
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which is where sanity comes into play
     
  5. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
  7. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    on if it ever sees a courtroom ?, sure, didn't you ask me for my paypal pass word once ?
     
  8. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no, on whether you guys will win this one.

    I'm up for the wager if you are.
     
  9. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i'm sorry i don't follow the court cases that much. the supremes have to decide this one. i think eventually they will.
     
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    they already decided it. US vs Wong kim ark. That is the binding precedent on natural born citizenship.
     
  11. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yeah.... where is wong ?? ...of course the logical response would be.... was he running for president too ??
     
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    running for president is irrelevant to the definition of natural born citizen. that definition was settled in the US vs Wong Kim Ark.
     
  13. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Rahl, are you a racist ??
     
  14. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    are you?
     
  15. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    no, has anyone ever accused you of being a racist ?
     
  16. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [video=youtube;Dwp0hV1F0hw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dwp0hV1F0hw&feature=player_embedded[/video]

    this is a lot of stuff i've been saying all along. the story is fabricated not genuine.
     
  17. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    poor sad birthers.
     
  18. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
  19. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
  20. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
  21. WongKimArk

    WongKimArk Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,740
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/116752480/The-Annotated-Zullo

    The Annotated Zullo

    On November 9th, 2012 erstwhile Maricopa County Cold Case Posse (MCCCP) “Investigator” Mike Zullo signed a massively expanded and updated second “affidavit” concerning his alleged investigation into the identity documents of President Barack Obama. I refer to it as an “alleged investigation” because there is very little investigative work to be found within the pages of the affidavit. To the extent it recounts lines of enquiry, they without exception all end in futility. To the extent it purports to recount “facts,” they are all recounted second hand, most of them ruthlessly plagiarized from the “work” of other birthers. To the extent that anyone appears to be the principal investigator here, it is certainlynot Mike Zullo but instead a person who is not even officially a posse member; birther “journalist” Jerome Corsi of the right-wing website World Net Daily (WND). And to the extent this affidavit represents a statement from Mike Zullo, it represents the near complete abandonment of even the pretense that he is an unbiased investigator instead of an ordinary, run-of-the-mill birther.

    More at the link.

    Enjoy.
     
  22. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    frank, i gotta ask, why are all of you putting so much effort into this ??
     
  23. WongKimArk

    WongKimArk Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,740
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was asked to by friends.

    How about you?
     
  24. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    still not convinced one way or the other, benghazi hasn't helped.
     
  25. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i'm reading your analysis very carefully, it's apparent that you have put a lot of time into it. i find it to be compelling and fascinating. i do have questions.

    this is the most editorialising i've seen you do, the motivation of which seems conflicting to me. i'm wondering why you seem to be back on the offensive, ridicule continuing to be the sharpest arrow in your quiver. also kevin seems to have redoubled his efforts, along with bryan, loren (collins), rc (??)... etc. it seems contradictory that you all trivialised/dismissed the subject while at the same time pouring your precious time into a non, dead, silly issue. you all seem too smart to me to still just be getting off on humiliating birthers after years. i would think the noelty of that would have worn off by now. i have watched kevin's site turn into a hate site, i noticed the same evolution, as the very same people were doing the same at john woodman's, until he pulled the plug. none of this seems rational to me.

    if it's ok. and i hope/assume it is, since you brought to the forum, i'd like to propose some new questions.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page