For me, I get a chuckle that he had a natural born Kenyan as a father. And was raised early as a Muslim.
You just keep throwing the bullcrap, I see. And more again. She was an adult. & "this buck from Kenya got into her" -- Good ****ing lord.
I notice nobody is saying WHY they think the video is a fake. People are being called stupid for watching it, but nobody is pointing out what the video got wrong or refuting the evidence. Instead, we are just supposed to believe that experts in Hawaii said everything is just fine. With Trump's taxes, democrats want for the law to be broken, or to bash trump for taking legal deductions, but with the birth certificate, we have actual evidence of fraud. This isn't wishful thinking, it is out in the open, and yet to be explained.
You recall garbage. The "law" in question you keep referring to was debunked long, long ago, grampz/ http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/citizen.asp "The item quoted above posits that Barack Obama does not qualify as a natural-born citizen of the U.S. because the law in effect at the time he was born specified that “If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.” Since Barack Obama only had one U.S. citizen parent (his mother), and his mother had not been residing in the U.S. for at least five years after the age of 16 when Barack was born (because she herself was only 18 at the time), then he’s not a natural-born citizen. A few facets of this claim immediately jump out as being far-fetched: first, that a sitting U.S. Senator who has already spent a good deal of time and money securing his party’s nomination for the presidency would suddenly be discovered as ineligible due to an obscure provision of U.S. law; and second, that U.S. law would essentially penalize someone who would otherwise qualify for natural-born citizenship status simply because his mother was too young. The fact is, the qualifications listed in the example quoted above are moot because they refer to someone who was born outside the United States. Since Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, they do not apply to him."
It tickles me that the left comes out as if swarms of mosquitoes to attack such claims. One might think they are angry.
Frankly, at the time of my research, it had to be 8 years ago. I have little interest in clerking for you today.
Does it not seem astounding to you, that nearly 10 years after one of the stupidest conspiracy theories of all times was started, after Obama was elected then reelected, and is now out of office -- that birthers are STILL, freakin aya! STILL pounding that long dead skeletonized horse -- even after their Orange Godking Birther in chief has declared Obama a US Citizen. Keeeeee-rist, this kind of inanity is at full-on brain-bleed levels.
Or you could read the post directly above the one you quoted which cites the law, showing how wrong you are - and sends fact bricks falling down upon you. Tsk
They (Democrats) get so excited over the birther issue. And they started it all. It simply is just too funny for words.
I get to watch Democrats heads explode. Will somebody else please rattle their chains again? They love discussing this. And they started it all. Toooooo funny. They actually started with this issue.
Robert, a troll is someone who makes posts to troll for response - you just admitted that's what you were doing. I didn't call you a troll as much as you admitted to being one. Congratulations.
This seems like abject nonsense. In my country, our first non-white politicians (upper level, and nationally known) were subjected to exactly the same ID rigour - no more and no less - as everyone else. Further, we've recently seen a WHITE politician undergo the same 'birther' type stuff as Obama did. No conspiracy theories or theorists involved, just plain question marks over country of origin.
Oh by the way Daniel, I hoped others might engage those frothing at the mouth about Obama. Why did you join?