Didn't the liberals try to tell us that the tea party was a "AstroTurf" movement consisting solely of paid operatives? I realize, of course, that as soon as everyone realize how silly that was, it magically morphed into a racist organization whose sole purpose was to keep down minorities. Then what was it, once that accusation brought nothing but laughter, a fringe group of extremists? So lets look at the occupy movement for a moment that you liberals hold so near and dear to your hearts. Occupy CPAC protesters paid $60 for the day This next quote is a real gem.
Or black tar heroin either way, they look 55 at age 30 and lost both their mind and teeth. There was difinately Unions taking part in the protest http://dcist.com/2012/02/occupy_and_labor_protesters_march_o.php#photo-1
Its standard operating procedure for the left handed.... Chicago community group accused of paying individuals to participate in school protest Occupy Wall Street Tied to Former ACORN Officials House Oversight Chairman Calls for Probe into ACORN Role in Occupy Wall Street ACORN Officials Scramble, Firing Workers and Shredding Documents, After Exposed as Players Behind Occupy Wall Street Protests
here's a little nancy porn for you scout you liberals really keep stepping in it. $60 per day. Is that even prevailing wage? [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiaQRNiXo2s"]Pelosi's Astroturf Comment - YouTube[/ame]
I don't see anything wrong with paying protestors to protest. It's a good honest day's work for a good honest day's pay.
Paying an homeless/poor guy to protest is like paying your friend to cover for you while you skip work. Your too lazy to do your own work yet your boss still thinks your not worthless.
It's a somewhat of a conflict of interest don't you think? If I had enough money, I could pretty much create whatever kind of movement I wanted.