Argh, I'm having a senior moment here. I was sure I heard somewhere that one of the military aircraft used charged particles in its exhaust to help propel the aircraft. I'm also forgetting about the future propulsion system they're going to use in commercial jets in the somewhat near future. I think it involved some kind of laser or radioactivity... But I'm not sure. If I remembered what they were about I could link to some articles on these two subjects. Alas I can't.
Oh well, regarding the future commercial jet propulsion system, I was probably tricked by a false headline. My first two clues should have been that several major airlines signed on for the new jet system, and two that anything with radioactivity would ever be involved in the engine of a commercial jet liner.
The F-22 has a form of Electromagnetic IR-Light Cloak. It also has engine exhaust cooling. I think that is what you are thinking of. AboveAlpha
The USAF has a still classified....and the ONLY reason I can even talk about this is that it's engine exhaust was captured on Google Earth.....a Nuclear Pulse Detonation Aircraft Propulsion Drive. Basically this aircraft is a Hypersonic over 100,000 foot in altitude Reconnaissance Aircraft. This USAF Aircraft is based at the Groom Lake Facility also known as Area 51. Google Earth caught what appears to be small puffs of smoke in like a pearl necklace as these puffs of smoke begin over the Groom Lake Facility.....continue over North America and over the Atlantic....over Europe and over Russia then China then over North Korea and on over the Pacific where the puffs of smoke continue till they come over Southern California and back to Area 51. AboveAlpha
Maybe? Or maybe the Nighthawk... Oh, well I heard it on a show I stumbled on while channel surfing. Something about stealth technology during the Clinton administration. I think they said more than they should have, but I don't remember the name of the show. Well I don't know, now, whether the article I saw was from someone new to the job and who jumped the gun on airing the news article before they had clearance. But it doesn't make sense that these airlines would be continuing to fund their green energy alternatives search if they knew they would have a new engine in the 2020s or 2030s... But that was an interesting insight into the nuclear pulse engine. Maybe it will happen after all.
Well, I started out interested in the details of what you were saying, but this was quickly drowned in frustration over your inability to say anything that actually resolved my questions. Since those concerns were laid by the wayside and weren't really looked upon again, I've just been replying to whatever you've been saying in hope that it'll be made clear.
Oh, put radiation along with not very clean and who knows what the fallout will be. Well, I'm sure my hair will grow back... or maybe not. Hey wait, is that any relation to exploding a nuclear weapon for thrust? Isn't that a violation of something?
Swensson....the only way I can answer your questions to any extent that might give you what you are asking me for is by giving you the Muliversal Algebraic Quadratic Equations that direct us to the new form Calculus and you would have to first be instructed in the symbology, syntax and be orientated to it function. Without the math I can't explain it verbally and because you have told me you don't want to see the math....well...there we are. AboveAlpha....if you want it I will post it but PLEASE don't ask me to go through all that unless you first understand the syntax and symbology. - - - Updated - - - You can't violate anything if it is not known to exist...right? AboveAlpha
I hope you have good teeth and bones! Strontium-90 gets into your teeth and bones. The body thinks it's calcium. Such radiation was released by the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986. It spread across the hemisphere. Both you and I were exposed to it. The half life on Strontium-90 is just under 29 years. That makes the half-life due date 2015, imagine that. It's 2015 now.
First of all I make sure not to screw around with anything Radioactive and I made sure I and all the members of my Team wore our Radiation badges when we were providing security for U.S. Military Nuclear Weapons Destruction Teams while we were in Russia and other former Soviet states. The thing that used to scare me was the Biological Weapons sites and labs. When the Soviet Union collapsed all the workers and scientists at these labs just....LEFT...as they were no longer getting paid. And the Soviet's did not have anywhere near the same safety protocols as say the CDC or U.S. Military Bio-Weapons Labs. AboveAlpha
So you've mentioned. And now that the cold war is over, cross fingers, you've go plenty of time to work on your multiversal theories. Which reminds me, some time ago you were saying that one of the members here led you to a search where you discovered that a research team wanted to meet with you about working together... How did that go?
Well, I want to see the assumptions that go into the maths. The maths, I will no doubt not understand (and to state that by the time I see it would look like I'm changing the subject). I suppose you can post whatever first principles you work from, maybe that can give some input and some idea of exactly what questions I will be asking.
This topic is about multiversal theories, and I just saw a news article about a new observation: Mystery bright spots could be first glimpse of another universe In the article they talk about inflation theory and how the universe continues to expand... and there could be multiple bubbles and pocket universes with different physics, and now they think they've found an indication that there are bubbles of a different universe rubbing up against ours... maybe.
Well as you know all Quanta is Particle/Wave Forms of Energy but the Quark/Gluon pairings effect can measured to detail their existence in virtual pairings. The fact we can measure their effect even if we can't physically detect them is why I have chosen them to be the Quanta specific to Causality and their place in a Multiversal System. There would seem to be a numerical reality associated with their measured effect specific to causality and thus all possible outcomes of cause and effect. AboveAlpha - - - Updated - - - That's why Universal Expansion rate ratio's are so important to figuring this out. Good one Wga. AboveAlpha - - - Updated - - - I really should not have discussed that. AboveAlpha
I can't help but think that the term "multiverse" is being applied to different things that are not at all alike. There are different universes popping up in space, but that's different than all possible outcomes splitting out into their own universes. One is a location, the other a divergent state. Two separate concepts for ideas about the existence other universes.
This is true for many particles, I don't see why that leads you to single out quarks and gluons. What do you mean by "numerical reality"? Do you mean that it has a number? That that number is real (and in that case, as opposed to complex in the mathematical sense or nonexistent in the physical or metaphysical sense?)? Their "measured effect", what effect is that? But I'd prefer you rephrasing your sentence in words that make sense above you trying to explain the words you use. Another supposed Feynman quote, "if you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't really understand it", I find to be relevant.
We can measure the effect thus measure the number of Virtual Quark/Gluon Pairings that will pop into existence within Hadrons and their number dependent upon the Hadron never exceeds a numerical maximum or exists in less than a numerical minimum. However they can be measured existing at and between this numerical minimum and maximum. It seems that the greater the probability that cause and effect will occur involving a specific Hadron that the number of measured Virtual Quark/Gluon pairings exists close to or at maximum and when probability is LOW for such a cause and effect action the number exists close to or at minimum. Because of this it would seem that when at or near maximum is specific to a greater number of divergent universal states of reality existing involving that specific cause and effect upon that Hadron. Lower or at minimum is specific to a smaller number of divergent universal states of reality. This is why I chose Virtual Quark/Gluon pairings and Quarks rather than chose other Quanta to detail Causality. AboveAlpha
See if you can follow this. Probabilities of various Fock states with strange and nonstrange quark-gluon sea contents are calculated to probe the hadronic structure. Particularly for nucleon, we find various contributions to the low energy properties from scalar, vector and tensor sea in addition to three valence quarks. We focus on the importance of individual sea contributions to the low energy parameters of nucleon by taking the strange and non strange quark-gluon content to the hadron sea. We confirm that the extended Fock space wavefunction is capable of explaining the experimental results where vector sea plays a crucial role in studying hadronic structure while scalar and tensor sea appears to be less dominating due to quark-spin flip process but cannot be neglected. Some of the properties like spin distribution and gA/gV ratio seem to be the most affected by the change in the statistically determined coefficients. Detailed analysis includes different approximations within the statistical approach to test the validity of the model chosen. Phenomenological implication of such sea affecting these properties is also discussed and the results are compared with the experiments. AboveAlpha
Wow!!!!!! I admit..... I don't exactly follow this reasoning but I get the intuitive feeling that this to some degree verifies my suspicion that fundamental or nearly fundamental energy...... .over nearly eternity in the past would tend to develop some sort of circuitry that could resemble the synaptic pathways in our brains...... or the circuitry in computers???! In other words..... intelligence is highly unlikely to have only existed for 4.5 billion years or less?????! www.CarbonBias.blogspot.ca/
Understand it is very possible that some form of INTELLIGENCE may have existed well before our Universe ever came into existence. It is most likely that there have existed infinite numbers of Multiversal Realities long before ours came into being. However TIME is actually SPACE-TIME. Thus Time is NON-LINEAR. Human's experience time as being LINEAR thus we view time as having a past, present and future but in reality WE ARE ALWAYS IN A PRESENT STATE. Thus Time is not Linear but rather CONCURRENT. AboveAlpha
Okay so how is traveling in a circle different in space-time as opposed to just time? And would the destination be the same as or slightly different from the origin point. Can we wish for a better future and give the space-time another go around?