We are much closer to war with Iran now than we ever were under Bush. Every Republican candidate for President is beating war drums, but Obama might beat them all to it. He tried diplomacy and it failed but why not keep on trying peaceful means to avert a crisis rather than give up so soon and use the "blood, money, and bombs" approach GOPpers prefer? http://www.thenation.com/article/166146/are-we-brink-war-iran
According to the article, Obama didn't have the brass to stand up to Netanyahu's Israel, who undermined diplomacy. Unfortunately, this is a theme with the Obama administration. He will stand for something, then be confronted with opposition, then cave in.
China/russia are going thru the motions in the UN, behaving like true nilhlists seemingly not careing. Although it is no secret both sets of countries huge business dealings with iran. The true measure for all this if the usa declares a war and pushes for bejing and the kremlins real position. Unlike iraq, iran has spent billions with the kremlin building reactors and selling oil to china. 2 of the perm 5 un members can veto it before it even starts.
My administration is now committed to diplomacy that addresses the full range of issues before us, Obama told the Iranians in his March 2009 Persian New Year video. This process will not be advanced by threats. We seek instead engagement that is honest and grounded in mutual respect. Israel, on the other hand, believed Washington must repeatedly emphasize that the military option remained on the table so Tehran would not see the United States as weak. Thus, when Obama pursued diplomacy, the Israelis sought to undermine him by increasing their militaristic rhetoric... And on the flip side there is an attempt to shift the blame to Saudi Arabia and France.
USA Diplomacy. Is so much fun. It never bloody works. Always ends with the american president waving a stick with the carrot lodged between his teeth. So going to upset europe again like the iraq mess?
You just answered your own question... We tried diplomacy and it didn't work, we tried the peaceful negotiations and they didn't work, we tried the sanctions, the world put pressure on them, nothing worked. The next step is force. It's not like we used force first, if we did that then you'd have a reason to complain. What sort of timeline are you ok with? How long do we use diplomacy before putting our foot down? Seriously I want a clear answer, 6 months? A year? 2 Years? 10 years?
Invading Iran is a suicide mission. It's not going to happen. If Obama gave the US military the order to run off a cliff and kill themselves, they will ask to see his birth certificate. Not the fake one, but real proof that he is constitutionally eligible to serve as President. It's fine for the Congress or the Courts to pretend that Obama is President. They're not the ones going to get killed by an Iranian missile, or have their kids coming home in body bags. If Obama gave the military cause to take over, it would create a crisis that could only be resolved by the military removing him from power. The Jewish power in the meantime would be finished.
Please give evidence, historical or military based, as to how the Iranian military would unconditionally defeat the US military backing up your claim to this being "suicide" on our part.
Who is this "nobody" that you speak of? Yourself? Your buddies? Last time I checked quite a few nations are against what Iran is doing. So "nobody" doesn't quite fit here. Yes this is a very dangerous situation, which is why it needs to be dealt with accordingly. Letting Iran do whatever they please is dangerous, yes I agree.
This all hinges on the chinese and russians. As usual with americans they ignore the bigger picture with WEB pointing out the ramifications of a possible military engagment. Although how the power games play out remains to be seen. China have yet to flex their military muscles and russia are continuing to build the nuke reactors for tehran.
And how has that been working out for us? Is Iran behaving better now? Believe me, I'm no fan of military action but saying "You better stop doing that or we will tell you you better stop doing that again." doesn't seem to be working all that well.
And neither China nor Russia will militarily intervene in Iran if the US invades. I'm by no means calling them soft, but China especially has enormous economic ties with the US, ties that if severed will hurt them dearly. Pride is one thing, survival is another. China would rather have their pride hurt by sitting on the sidelines making threats than acting on those treats and ruining their growing economy.
That is the whole problem with so callled usa diplomacy. Short sighted and threatneing. They should of followed other nations lead "which the usa cant as too close to israel" and ignored all the politics to instead put their head down for business deals. Worked for bejing and the kremlin who have a decision to make, join the americans for a new iran with lost revenue or continue the status quo with the iranian regime spending their resoures on russian military tech and selling low cost oil to the chinese.
Dont understimate the chinese. Also another problem is the huge usa ignorance to a country they have massive trade with. You should really learn about them instead of lost in vague propoganda.
Which is part of the reason the US wants to put Iran in check. The reason the Russians and Chinese are mad is because of what you just said, Tehran buys Russian hardware and China gets cheap oil. If the US marches in there and starts causing a storm them Russian hardware sales slow down and China won't be getting their cheap oil. The other 2 world powers aren't against the US invading Iran because its morally "wrong", they are against it for business reasons. Since half the world hates the US anyway they try to flaunt their moral argument around and hope it sticks to ignorant people who don't understand world politics very well.
Then this a dangerous game you are going into with geopolitics. As said russia and china have spent the last few decades securing business deals with terhan. Oil/military etc.. they wont be happy losing it. Your view of world politics seems to be the usa doing what it likes in a world of other nuclear powers. As said a dangerous game.
That's what I said, if we severed ties with China it would hurt the US, but it would hurt China more. Neither of us are willing to do that, but at the end of the day China will fall farther than the US would. That's like shooting yourself in the head to shoot me in the leg. Yes I would bleed and hurt and could possibly die, but you would die first and faster than me. That's why the US has the ability to keep pushing forward with its plans for Iran in spite of what China thinks. We know the consequences of severed ties with China and what would happen to our economy. If it came down to it then it would be a game of poker until the last second. If the US put troops on the ground in Iran the only thing that would turn us around would likely be Chinese troops on the other side protecting Tehran. The threats would have to turn into reality. The US doesn't get punked by threats. But if China literally followed through with their threats then Im pretty sure both nations would back off. Neither is going to destroy themselves over Iran.
China buys far more oil from Saudi Arabia than from Iran. Iran isn't a US problem... Its an Israeli problem that Israel can easily solve with diplomacy.
Are you being intentionally stupid for my amusement? Why would the usa risk trade war with china. you would lose more than they would. Your economy would tank while the chinese court foriegn corps to replace you. Forget it, you seem like a naive boy. How does block work on this thing?
No I just know how the world works. There is no right and wrong or black and white. Everything is a grey area. All nations are fighting for themselves. The US is doing that as well, just like China with the oil and Russia with the hardware. If Russia and China want to keep their business deals going with Iran with the US out of the way then they should be pressuring Iran to stop building the nukes. That's the main reason the US is bothering Iran. Russia and China don't want the US to think it can do whatever it wants so instead of taking the easier way out and just telling their business partner to cooperate, they instead decide to turn a blind eye to it and give the US the finger. So in turn the US gives them the finger right back and says we're going to screw up everything for you both by invading Iran, ruining your business deal and stopping their nuke production. We are no different than anyone else, China won't cooperate, Russian won't cooperate, America won't cooperate, and Iran won't cooperate. The US doesn't want Iran with nukes, Russia and China don't want the US bothering Iran, Russia and China won't tell Iran to stop the main thing upsetting the US so that they can keep their deals going. We are all giving each other the finger, don't act like its just the US as the bad guy here.