Operation Northwoods Proves That Cuba Was The Target To Be Blamed

I never said that the vertebrae bunch up. Jackets and shirts do and in fact you are wrong the germs use describe the same area in different ways especially since the dividing line between back and neck is somewhat subjective.

Neither source claims it struck vertebrae both agreed it struck near the same vertebrae.

The only difference is in describing what part of the back the bullet entered which is not a significant change.

Changing a adjective is not significant.

This change was for clarification only even if it failed.

It was not done to line up the sounds as you claim they simply did line up regardless of the terms used.

They did not.move connally at all he was in fact to Kennedy's left CLOSER to the center of the limo. That is simple fact dictated by the location of the seat he rode in.

He was in fact also turned somewhat to his right as the zapruder film clearly shows.

The WC did not alter these facts they proved these facts

 

I never said that the vertebrae bunch up. Jackets and shirts do and in fact you are wrong the germs use describe the same area in different ways especially since the dividing line between back and neck is somewhat subjective.

No it is not subjective. In fact it is very distinct. That is why there are different NAMES for different sects. In fact each vertebrae has a medical name that is unique to it.

The lowest "cervical (neck) veret. is the C7. The WC placed the shot at the C6. The autopsy placed it at the Thoracic 3. That is a five inch difference and in terms of bullet tracking that is huge.

And of course the botched autopsy never dissected the wounds to follow the track of the bullet. That's basic forensics but they didn't do it on the most high profile autopsy of the century.

As far as Connolly...they absolutely moved him. In order to make the shots line up he had to be sitting almost in the middle of the car and turned around facing the curb when he was shot. No pictures show him in that position. "Tuned somewhat" is not facing the curb and that's were hew would have had to have been facing in order for that Magic bullet to hit him.

If you've ever seen Arlen Specter and his famous pencil (showing his interpretation of the bullet track)...you know that what I'm saying is accurate

 

The difference in description once again is trivial.

You keep referring to vertebrae when Neither the autopsy or ec claimed he was hit in the vertebrae but near a vertebrae. Yes you are wrong and precisely where the neck and the back are divided is subjectibe especially since each human body is different. They did not move the location of the wound they described the same spot in different ways which is not a significant change.

If I am shot the front one expert might say I was shot in the front torsoe while another says I was shot the chest. The same thing applies to your argument proving you wrong.

They did not move or place connally in the middle period that assertion of yours is an easily proven lid.

They simply observed where he was seated dictated by the placement of the seat and nothing more.

No where in the report do they claim he was turned around or in the middle.

You have never read the report and have no clue what it says.

The film CLEARLY shows connally was in fact looking over his right shoulder and that is all they said.

Your claim that they changed or altered anything like this is a flat out lie proven by the report and the film.
That is FACT and your repeated assertions are childish.

 

The difference in description once again is trivial.

Nonsense. It's critical in determining bullet trajectory.

You keep referring to vertebrae when Neither the autopsy or ec claimed he was hit in the vertebrae but near a vertebrae

That was the description of WHERE the bullet struck. It's a locator. I never claimed it hit bone. Only as the autopsy stated "it entered AT the T3 vert. which is 5 inched below the neck, which ends at the C7 vert.

They simply observed where he was seated dictated by the placement of the seat and nothing more.

Nonsense. They moved him to a place that no picture shows him to be in and a position no picture shows him to be in, so that they could line up the shot.

No where in the report do they claim he was turned around or in the middle.
Of course they did. That's the only position that would have put his wounds in that bullet trajectory.

The film CLEARLY shows connally was in fact looking over his right shoulder and that is all they said.

There's disagreement of when he looked over is shoulder (was it before or after Kennedy was hit...by the bullet that supposedly also hit Connolly) but no where does it show him facing the curb, which was where he would have had to be facing for that bullet to have gone through Kennedy and into Connolly.

It is you who are lying my friend

 

you took him to school big time there.

 

the chessmatch is over and you are checkmating your opponent here.

 

He is losing as you prove whenever you cheer someone on.

 

No it is not remotely important to determining trajectory.

HUH? You're claiming that moving the entrance wound around doesn't change the ballistics flight?

Are you insane? Try a little simple geometry.

Utterly ridiculous

Looking over his shoulder doesn't line his left nipple and his left thigh up with his right armpit. The only thing that does that is to turn him almost completely outboard. And then to get THAT to line up with Kennedy's wounds he has to be moved so that his butt is almost directly in the middle of the car.

There are no pictures that show either of those things.

 

They did not move it they described it differently it remained in the same spot.

Wrong again a slight turn to the left looking to his left lines up all the wounds except the leg wound.

Your claim he had to be facing the curb is false and unsupported by any evidence.

The leg wound is accounted for by the bullet changing direction after striking dense bone.

It never entered or exited the arm pit it entered connalys back in the right side end exited under his right nipple and no one said other wise

 

Still making the same tired claims?

I have an idea.

Post some links to document your bombast.

 

The WC documents and proves them all try reading

 

I see. But you don't know on what page any of that "proof" lies?

 

why do you bother with someone who closes their eyes and covers their ears to evidence and facts and only sees what they WANT to see ESPECIALLY since you took him to school and checkmated him in post # 11?

 

He never did

 

Pardon Nazi. He can't read.

 

The absolute best resource site on the web

https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Main_Page.html

 

the UNDERSTATEMENT of the century.