Origin of the Racist Myth "Blacks are Less Intelligent"

The Ku(*)(*)(*)(*)es, Phoenicians and Israelites all had written texts before the Japhites (gentiles) did.

These Semitic and Hamitic people do not come from the Caucus mountains. Yes, they travelled there to civilize the gentiles but it is not their heritage.

The only people whose ancestors are from the caucus mountains are the Japhites (gentiles). These are the european (white) people. About 90% of white people trace their ancestry to Japheth. I am the 10% who trace it through north africa and spain, afro-celts.

 

This may all be true, but "Caucasian" in the racial sense doesn't mean "from the Caucus mountains". It refers to the peoples in the broad geographic area of Europe, North Africa and West/South Asia, who show signs of shared ancestry, and are distinct from East Asians and SS Africans. Blumenbach just used the term Caucasian because he thought they were typical of the type.

Oh and might I remind you that writing is not the only mark of civilization. North Europeans have always been dominant in metallurgy and mechanics.

 

Caucus asians are asians who went to the caucus and the ancestor to white ppl. The meaning of caucasian is those who descend from the caucus mountains. Japheth is the only son of Noah who went north into the caucus region. Therefore it is logical to assume all europeans are descended from Japheth. This is noted in Israelite literature from the Josephus chronicles. Christian identity ppl hate Isrealite literature because it proves that the europeans are gentiles.

The problem with european literature that you have is that when you boil it all down it reveals the truth, you can't handle that.

 

Noah had three sons and one wife. All of his sons were the same "race". Who are the indigenous ppl of the world all over? They are the sons of Noah. Japheth wanted to be white, so he was granted that wish and through genetic mutation or as some state, through genetic manipulation Japheth was turned white and spawned the "white race", what we call today caucasians.

 

Please spare me the laughable bible justifications.

Try reading the latest genetic studies: The Role of Geography in Human Adaptation.

Mapping Human Genetic Diversity in Asia

You are confused by the fact that "Caucasian" can have two senses: "from the Caucasus" or "a group of people in West Eurasia showing shared ancestry".

Nobody is claiming they are "from the Caucasus", that's just a name they were given by Blumenbach.

Got it now?

 

Maybe you should read your sources first!

Nothing they state contradicts my position.

Semites and Hamites are not caucasions, Japhites are.

You just stay getting owned ok boy

 

No, the source supports Semites and Hamites being Caucasian.

OK boy?

 

Not in the section you quoted, maybe it does in the link somewhere I don't know, you didn't provide a quote. You won't be able to do this because the term caucasian was coined in 1800. The terms semite and hamite were coined 3,000 years ago.

The correct term for caucasian is Japheth. Japheth is the ancestor of caucasians. Israelite literature is more reliable when dealing with ancient times as the Israelites were well travelled and kept a recorded history unlike Japhites who only inhabited northern europe in antiquity.

 

Face the fact that you have been caught looking ignorant again. I brought up the Mande peoples because you were insisting that the only civilized people in the region were Arabs.

As for writing, very few Aryans took up writing until decades or centuries after wiping out the surrounding literate cultures, like the did in India.

Greek history was, in fact, transmitted in the same way as Mande culture until the Semites with whom they had contact taught them to write.

The only literate people the Mande peoples met prior to the arrival of Islam were the Tuareg, but the Tuareg used writing mostly for record keeping and territorial markings or trade route information scribbled on rock shelters. They did not develop any extensive belle lettres prior to the arrival of Islam and Arabic script.

The ancestors of the current populations of sub-Saharan Africa arrived in their current locations fairly recently, compared to the various populations of Europe and Asia. Nomadic peoples do not generally develop as much material culture as settled peoples. This does not mean that they lack the intelligence to do so. Wandering herders do not have the capacity to drag significant libraries about with them, but they can still make some interesting music.

Your problem here is that you know squat about how the human mind adapts or fails to adapt to a given situation.

 

Much as I'd like to engage in a pissing contest re. your dubious version of history, it would be better to stick the point you fail to grasp, which was that blacks have never developed a literate civilization independently (after being exposed to writing), and still fail to do so to this day, such as Detroit, Haiti, etc.

 

I've absolutely no idea what you are talking about. West Eurasians and North Africans exhibit similarities in ancestry, genotype and phenotype. A word used to refer to this group is "Caucasian". I have absolutely no interest in or regard for your ridiculous fairy tales.

 

I guess you've never heard of Kemet, Sumeria or Israel, you must be a white american. If it wasn't for so- called Black ppl then the whites would never have learnt to read and write, for it was these civilizations that are the foundations of western civilization.

 

Caucasians have only been around for 300 years. They didn't do jack in antiquity.

 

To develop an independant civilization requires resourc es and stability.

A poor nation surrounded by hostile forces does not generally do well.

A large underclass, constantly excluded from the mainstream of society, will not do well.

This is pretty basic stuff.

 

No they have been around for over 40,000 years.

 

But then there are countless examples where blacks were left to their own devices, such as Haiti, and failed, where whites, such as in Iceland, succeeded. Why must you blame whites for everything? Are you a traitor? Do you hate white people?

 

No. The first mention or documentation of caucasians is less than 300 years old. Blummenbach. 1889.

You lose again. Thats got to be about 5-0 to me.

 

Iceland caused the collapse of the EU. It was the first nation to go bankrupt. They are sorry failures of society. Nice example.

 

Clearly you have a problem distinguishing the word "Caucasian" and the thing "Caucasian".

"The word dinosaur was coined in 1842 so dinosaurs are only 150 years old."

What an utter ****.

Yeah 6-0 to you champ.

*facepalm*

 

Patience child.

What were they called before 1889?

 

Jewish bankers collapsed Iceland's economy. They put them in prison. And the place is still much better than Haiti.

 

I think we have established that you have no credibility. Thanks for trying!

 

What were caucasians called before 1889? This is important for it will help me show how they were never in Africa in antiquity.

 

*facepalm*

 

Anti-semitic racist. Wow, you don't have much going for you do you.