Outdated In Outer Space: Russia's Soyuz Program Crashes And Burns:

Discussion in 'Russia & Eastern Europe' started by janpor, Aug 30, 2011.

  1. janpor

    janpor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,046
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Outdated in Outer Space: Russia's Soyuz Program Crashes and Burns

    By Benjamin Bidder in Moscow

    As I said before, without any schadenfreude (= злорадства), the Russian space technology works but it hopelessly outdated. I was laughed of the forum by some Russian and American members.

    Maybe Europeans and Russians should work together on developing a new set of rockets and manned space-craft? Maybe even a spacelift!
     
  2. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And yet the Russians are the only ones left with any means of going up there... Let them fly brooms for all I care, they are the space champions of today. Thanks, Obama for losing space race for us :gun:
     
  3. Beevee

    Beevee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    13,916
    Likes Received:
    146
    Trophy Points:
    63
    So cutting dollar space waste isn't the way to reduce the deficit?

    Any alternative suggestions?
     
  4. janpor

    janpor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,046
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Uhm, it is Mr. Bush Jr. that decided to phase-out the Space Shuttle program. That is a fact.

    The problem with the Soyuz-program is that it is hopelessly outdated. The strength of the Russian program is that it is cheap as hell, it's the most cost-effective way of putting x amount of kg into outer space.
     
  5. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is all correct.

    The Space Shuttle had to go. It was a giant money sink that served very little practical purpose now that the heavy lifting and assembling of ISS is complete.

    Personally, I'd rather robots with American flags stenciled on their sides floating out to every inch of our solar system and looking for minerals, precious metals and other geological structures and exploitable natural resources.

    Who knows? Maybe some rare and exotic space element is waiting to be discovered that could advance our metallurgical processing by leaps and bounds?

    That is what we should be looking for. let the Russians and other 3rd world countries play in the LEO wading pool while we advance far far beyond.
     
  6. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It happened on Obama's watch, therefore it is his fault.

    However outdated Russian rockets are, they are the only ones that are flying. Thanks, Obama...
     
  7. KGB agent

    KGB agent Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,032
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Eleborate, please. Why to change pretty reliable and cheap missile and spaceship? What is the point of building "advanced", expencive and dangerous to people inside shuttles?
     

Share This Page