OWS supporter offended by TROOPS sign

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by kk8, Jan 31, 2012.

  1. kk8

    kk8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    7,084
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What is wrong with these people? So now they will be offended by people displaying "We support our troops" signs? When they can write up any sign they please, and than scream how it's "freedom of speech" These people are truly crazy hypocrite lunatics with wayyyy to much time on their hands.

    Occupy Supporter Demands ‘We Support Our Troops’ Sign Be Taken Down From MN Building
    Posted on January 30, 2012

    An Occupy supporter in Little Falls, Minnesota, is demanding that a “We Support Our Troops” sign be removed from a building in her hometown. The woman, named Robin Hensel, is taking this combative action after city officials told her she needed to remove an excessive number of signs and posters that were once present in her frontyard.

    According to officials, residents are only legally allowed to display one sign on their property — a city code that Hansel takes particular issue with. So, in response to the city’s code enforcement, she has set her sights on the pro-troop sign, which she says also violates local code.

    In an interview with KSTP-TV, Hensel said that her original posters were merely “promoting ideas that promote peace and justice” and she lamented the city’s crackdown on them. The posters took particular aim at the U.S. government and the War on Terror.

    “If good people that are passionate about their causes don’t find a platform to be able to speak out freely in a peaceful kind of way — we’re in trouble,” she said.

    Once she was forced to remove her signs, she found other ways to display her messaging. Rather than posting signs in her front yard, she has now posted them all over her van, on the windows of her home and she has erected a ladder with the one permitted sign she can have on her front yard. It reads, in part, “Occupy the Dream.”

    Of the town’s “Support Our Troops” sign, she says that city code requires both a permit and approval from the city’s historic preservation committee. Hensel says that the banner has neither and, thus, it should be taken down. But her issue with the mural transcends the mere code violations.

    “The sign suggests that some of us don’t support our troops,” she says. “The truth is — we all do — through taxation.”

    US
    Occupy Supporter Demands ‘We Support Our Troops’ Sign Be Taken Down From MN Building
    Posted on January 30, 2012 at 7:18am by Billy Hallowell Print »Email »
    Comments (124)An Occupy supporter in Little Falls, Minnesota, is demanding that a “We Support Our Troops” sign be removed from a building in her hometown. The woman, named Robin Hensel, is taking this combative action after city officials told her she needed to remove an excessive number of signs and posters that were once present in her frontyard.


    According to officials, residents are only legally allowed to display one sign on their property — a city code that Hansel takes particular issue with. So, in response to the city’s code enforcement, she has set her sights on the pro-troop sign, which she says also violates local code.

    In an interview with KSTP-TV, Hensel said that her original posters were merely “promoting ideas that promote peace and justice” and she lamented the city’s crackdown on them. The posters took particular aim at the U.S. government and the War on Terror.


    Some of the signs that were once present in Robin Hensel's yard.
    “If good people that are passionate about their causes don’t find a platform to be able to speak out freely in a peaceful kind of way — we’re in trouble,” she said.

    Once she was forced to remove her signs, she found other ways to display her messaging. Rather than posting signs in her front yard, she has now posted them all over her van, on the windows of her home and she has erected a ladder with the one permitted sign she can have on her front yard. It reads, in part, “Occupy the Dream.”



    Of the town’s “Support Our Troops” sign, she says that city code requires both a permit and approval from the city’s historic preservation committee. Hensel says that the banner has neither and, thus, it should be taken down. But her issue with the mural transcends the mere code violations.

    “The sign suggests that some of us don’t support our troops,” she says. “The truth is — we all do — through taxation.”

    Others, though, disagree with her stance.

    “It’s patriotic for our country,” one local man says. “We should have it up.”

    US
    Occupy Supporter Demands ‘We Support Our Troops’ Sign Be Taken Down From MN Building
    Posted on January 30, 2012 at 7:18am by Billy Hallowell Print »Email »
    Comments (124)An Occupy supporter in Little Falls, Minnesota, is demanding that a “We Support Our Troops” sign be removed from a building in her hometown. The woman, named Robin Hensel, is taking this combative action after city officials told her she needed to remove an excessive number of signs and posters that were once present in her frontyard.


    According to officials, residents are only legally allowed to display one sign on their property — a city code that Hansel takes particular issue with. So, in response to the city’s code enforcement, she has set her sights on the pro-troop sign, which she says also violates local code.

    In an interview with KSTP-TV, Hensel said that her original posters were merely “promoting ideas that promote peace and justice” and she lamented the city’s crackdown on them. The posters took particular aim at the U.S. government and the War on Terror.


    Some of the signs that were once present in Robin Hensel's yard.
    “If good people that are passionate about their causes don’t find a platform to be able to speak out freely in a peaceful kind of way — we’re in trouble,” she said.

    Once she was forced to remove her signs, she found other ways to display her messaging. Rather than posting signs in her front yard, she has now posted them all over her van, on the windows of her home and she has erected a ladder with the one permitted sign she can have on her front yard. It reads, in part, “Occupy the Dream.”



    Of the town’s “Support Our Troops” sign, she says that city code requires both a permit and approval from the city’s historic preservation committee. Hensel says that the banner has neither and, thus, it should be taken down. But her issue with the mural transcends the mere code violations.

    “The sign suggests that some of us don’t support our troops,” she says. “The truth is — we all do — through taxation.”



    Others, though, disagree with her stance.

    “It’s patriotic for our country,” one local man says. “We should have it up.”


    City officials plan to take up Hansel’s complaints about the banner at the next city council meeting on Feb. 6. On Martin Luther King Day, Hansel organized and took part in a local “Occupy the Dream” event, as she has continued to support the anti-Wall Street movement that took form last September.

    click here for video:

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/occ...r-troops-sign-be-taken-down-from-mn-building/
     
  2. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Im not surprised in the least...
     
  3. kenrichaed

    kenrichaed Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,539
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm sure she'd have no problem walking down the street and seeing huge banners of Stalin hanging from every building.
     
  4. DonGlock26

    DonGlock26 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    47,159
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Progressives loath the military in peacetime, and only pay it lip service in wartime as needed.

    _
     
  5. Taxcutter

    Taxcutter New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    20,847
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wonder if she's gonna take a dump on a cop car. OWS types are big on that.
     
  6. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If a bunch of Marines urinated on her, I wouldnt cry...
     
  7. Mad Conservative

    Mad Conservative New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,481
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sounds like a woman desperate for a cause - any cause, no matter how stupid it is or makes her look.
     
  8. sec

    sec Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    31,803
    Likes Received:
    7,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well bless her heart

    at least she is occupying her own home. I'd hate to be her neighbor and her feelings toward the troops is not a surprise
     
  9. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course not. These are far left liberals. Of course they are offended by the military just like they are offended by police.
     
  10. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd laugh!
     
  11. way2convey

    way2convey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    16,627
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    They've found a niche in the "victim-hood" market and intend to make full use of the platform to avoid looking closely at their own failures. "Occupy" is a great outlet to occupy loosers.
     
  12. Smartmouthwoman

    Smartmouthwoman Bless your heart Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    55,913
    Likes Received:
    24,873
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Exactly... they don't have time to go find a job, they've gotta pick up their protest sign and check in at the park at 0900!
     
  13. Talon

    Talon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    46,816
    Likes Received:
    26,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    "Suggests"? :roll:

    Nice to know where this OccuTard's "support" ends...

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Rapunzel

    Rapunzel New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2010
    Messages:
    25,154
    Likes Received:
    1,107
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]


    Look like a dump to me.

    What's that old saying??? Garbage in, Garbage out.
     
  15. RichT2705

    RichT2705 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    28,887
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    I dont see people in the pic...lemme guess, this was how they left the place?
     
  16. Subdermal

    Subdermal Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    12,185
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who's surprised by this bubblehead's opinion on what constitutes free speech?

    These are the same sorts of people who fabricated a notion of "separation of church and state" which doesn't exist legally either, so intruding into other examples of free speech by claiming offense is just going to be open season.
     
  17. RichT2705

    RichT2705 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    28,887
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    She's just another baby throwing a tantrum. Someone made her take her signs down..so she's going to stamp her feet, and try and get someone else to do the same.

    OWS is a garbage movement, filled with garbage people.
     
  18. sec

    sec Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    31,803
    Likes Received:
    7,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    but, they are an example of what liberalism has brought us. From everyone winning in youth sports, to political correctness, to vilifying those who have had success
     

Share This Page