First my basic premises. while we can debate mandatory sentencing and the specifics of parole as an option with different crimes, we have to recognize that as long as we have had prisons and sentencing, we have had release from incarceration. We will always be letting a high percentage of those put in prison, out of prison. The thieves, the drug offenders and those who's violent conduct did not lead to death or rape or child molestation will get out. That is a non-partisan reality. Whether we want tougher judges or longer sentencing, these people will get release dates, especially if they tow the line while they are in there. If that is true, then we have a non-ideologically bound interest in seeing that ex-cons and former felons have as good a success rate as we can, because it is always far cheaper, and better for communities if they do not re-offend. Conservatives and liberals share that interest. That means we should identify what really makes the difference between success and failure and figure out how we can promote success either on the cheap, or through government investment. We know that maintaining connections with family usually helps, because they are likely the first defense against being homeless, hungry and desperate from day one. they also can be the reason to stay straight when it is contrary to instinct. The longsuffering Mom, the wife, the girlfriend, the kids are often a major incentive not to screw up again and disappoint those who's love and support was constant and those emotional ties matter. We also know that money matters, self pride matters and a sense of accomplishment matters. That means JOBS and fairly quickly. That is why this is so strongly emphasized in parole. If they stay unemployed than they will either drive their loved ones into poverty, or learn to fall to other patterns to earn money. And we do not like those other patterns. Ex cons have a horrible time finding work even in good economic times, especially if their families and support systems are in areas with poor opportunities at a decent wage and within decent traveling constraints. Can we agree on any steps to encourage success rates and reduce recidivism after the inevitable release. NO point in giving a second chance, if we do not really give a second chance. And we will definitely end up giving that second chance one way or another. It just is. Any ideas?
