Pics of black serial killers the lib media kept hidden from you...

Are you looking at a different OP than I am

Notice that the most prolific serial killer in United States history is a black man. Also notice that a good many of these black serial killers raped WHITE women before they killed them. I'm just wondering with the black man's proclivity to rape and murder WHITE women that there weren't more hangings of these scum during the slave days. Anyway, the list of black serial killers is too long to squeeze inside this 6+ minute video, but most of you will get a good looksee into the sick minds of these blacks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8gYc5fvMQ0

 

No, they're not...

Hence, asking for them to be listed...

Much like a child, you resort to name-calling when you're wrong...

How pathetic...

Your names, that you finally listed, don't match Holmes, Toole, Lucas, Ridgway, etc...

 

"Finally"? I reported them in the next post when asked. Do you expect me to answer within seconds? I actually have better things to do.

The names of black serial killers are in the OP video.

They are just as bad as any white serial killer. And they are in the U.S. a white country.

If you want to see some really sick people, just look at Africa.

 

When I said that, you just got grouped in with the other couple of proponents of this BS that have been asked for the names, because the rational among us don't want to dignify that racist propaganda by visiting the page...

Like I've said, the worst US serial killers have been White males...

That doesn't say anything about White males in general, those are just the facts...

As far as Africa, we're talking about US serial killers, so, anyone in Africa is irrelevent to the discussion...

 

Also, I should point out that the Zebra Murders and the Beltway Snipers don't fit the criteria for classification as a serial killer...

That is mass murder...

There's a difference...

Also, there's a ton of suspicion surrounding the Wayne Williams case...

 

If you want to see some really sick people, just look at Africa.

Edit: This "person" was never prosecuted despite admitting to these crimes and is currently free in Africa. He may even decide to immigrate to your country. You can welcome him to prove you are not "racist".

 

I see you're still not capable of remaining on topic...

We are talking about serial killers in America...

So, are you going to address my points, or, just ignore them?

 

If you want to see some really sick people, just look at Africa.

This "person" was never prosecuted despite admitting to these crimes and is currently free in Africa. He may even decide to immigrate to your country. You can welcome him to prove you are not "racist".

 

So, you're not going to address my point, and, are going to continue to stray off the actual topic of US serial killers...

Don't worry...

It happens frequently when people are proven wrong on here, and, is quite expected...

 

And after all of the racist BS the fact remains that 9 out of 10 serial killers are white males typically between the ages of about 25 and 35.

 

You see the one straggler tapped out, don't you?

Even they realize when their BS has reached its end...

Sometimes...

 

it's more like a herd mentality, no buddies to back them up, they split.

either that, or they wait for the update from stormfront.

 

The bias and dishonesty and anti-white hatred on display in this thread is so transparent it is actually funny and not fooling anyone.

You are shooting yourselves in the foot.

A) Blacks are statistically overrepresented among U.S. serial killers.
B) Why would you look at a white country and point out that most serial killers are white? What point are you trying to make? You don't have a point. The point of this thread is that black serial killers are suppressed by the media. Rather that admit this fact you just say "9 out of 10 serial killers are white", which is incidentally B.S. Should I look at China and say "10 out of 10 serial killers are Chinese"? What would that prove other than I hate Chinese people?

You are the racists.

 

Statistically the "White" population of the United States is only 66% and "White" males that are responsible for about 90% of all serial murders are only about 33% of the population. While not all other serial murders are committed by "Blacks" of either sex the entire "Black" population of the United States is only 13% if we made the false assumption that they committed all other serial murderes that would only account for 10% of serial murders. Based upon these numbers, accounting for percentages of the population, a "White male" is statistically 3.5 times more likely to be a serial killer on a per capita basis than a "Black" of either sex.

I would suggest that when someone tosses out the term "statistically" that they know simple math so that they can calculate relative statistical probability.

The United States is not a "White" country as only 66% of Americans are "White" based upon the 2010 US Census but the above statement is completely ignorant because it's comparing race in the United States with nationality in China. Virtually all serial murders in the United States are committed by "Americans" just like virtually all serial murders in China are committed by "Chinese" based upon nationality.

And this conclusion is based upon a BS statistical claim that is completely false and an ignorant statement that attempts to compare race to nationality. Here's a simple statement of logic. If "A" is False and "B" is False then "A+B" is False.

 

Washington state

2025 murders from 2000 to 2010

439 committed by negroes...1/4 of ALL the murders in Washington state..committed by negroes.
(I'm not including stats for hispanic/NON white or asian or native american)

329 victims were negroes. Again..not including the races I mentioned above in these stats.
The demographics of the state include appx 195,000 negroes total.

Nice to sit up in your lily white safety zone in some podunk little white town far detached from the reality of race and talk about which author wrote which book and "correct" those of us that know and experience the differences between the races every day of our lives.

Spend a month in detroit, memphis, st. louis, new orleans, miami, chicago, atlanta, montgomery...etc..ANY majority black city...take your pick.
Come back and tell us there is no difference between the races.

 

So what does this off topic comment mean? We're addressing serial killers, not common murder.

The issue of black crime, including murder, has been addressed by other threads where it's been documented that the high black crime rates are directly linked to generational discriminatory which create a denial of equality that has been propagated by "White" racists since before the founding of the United States. If that issue wants to be addressed, which it already has been, then it should be addressed on the threads that are dedicated to it.

When it comes to serial killings 90% are committed by "White" males typically between the ages of 25 and 35 and the odds are over 3.5 times more likely that it was committed by a "whlte male" than by a "black" based upon per capita statistics even if we make the wild assumption that all serial murders not committed by "white males" are committed by "blacks" which, of course, they are not.

That's the fundamental problem with this thread. It is solely based upon lies and ignorance. The "liberal media" covers all serial killers and, in fact, the information in the OP originally came from the "liberal" media. Statistically serial murders in the United States are overwhelmingly a "white male crime" where "blacks" represent a very, very small percentage of the problem. This thread is a false as the racists claim that "blacks" are the "racists" in the United States when the FBI statistics reflect that per capita a black person is 22-times more likely to be a victim of a racial hate crime than a white person.

 

..............................

 

No it hasn't that's marxist propaganda. The disproportionate number of murders committed by negroes in your state reflect the problem.
I see also that violent crime and property crime in everette far exceed the average for snohomish county and the state of wash.
Who's committing these disproportionate numbers of crime?
Evil, oppressive, racist whites, no doubt.

Smoke screen. That's semantics and depends on how the reporting agency classified it. The FBI doesn't look at every muder, rape, robbery..etc..and determine whether or not it's a hate crime...They go with what's reported.
Every white person murdered, robbed or raped by a negro is victim of a racial "hate" crime.

but you are correct. I wandered off topic...(facts and truth are never off topic, are they?)
I'll withdraw.
mikemikev has this completely under control.

 

Fraid not...

 

I wonder if people ever read what they post.

So according to Hickey blacks comprise 22% of all "minority serial killers" which only represents 10% of all serial killers. That would result in only 2.2% of all serial killers being black.

Please note the Hickey's "databases" have obvious errors and the sources aren't cited. We have 800, 558 and 399 cases being reviewed that overlap so obviously the 558 and 399 databases are inaccurate and even the 800 in one database is highly questionable because it has more "serial killers" identified than the number of estimated serial killers in the US during the 20th Century. As was exemplified by the original OP there is a common mixing of mass murderers with serial killers which leads to highly inaccurate analysis. A mass murder isn't a serial killer. We are not given any reference to what databases are being used nor do we know the criteria established for the databases which, as noted, could contain many common murders that are not serial killers and this thread is exclusively about serial killers.

 

22% of total were black as corroborated by the other databases.

The databases are for different time periods and contain different totals.

It's very rich that you come up with empty criticism of my data, when you have no data at all, only lies.

 

More false statements,

The time period between 1800 and 1995 (399 reported cases) would include the vast majority of the time period between 1900 and 1999 (800 reported cases) and the time period of 1900 to present (558 reported cases) would also include the time period between 1900 and 1999. We can't have 800 cases "reported" between 1900-1999 and fewer than that reported from 1800-1995 or 1900 to present.

We can also note that Hickey states that there are been "plenty of minority killers" and then states that of "such killers" (i.e. minority killers) that 22% were black. It's not my place to teach English but a person really does have to be able to read to present a convincing argument.

Of note Hickey holds a minority opinion in any case and his "databases" can be discarded because they are self-conflicting and of a completely unknown source. I can personally create a "criminal database" that contains any amount of distorted statistics and apparently no one should be able to question it but personally I would question it especially if it conflicts with law enforcement statistics.

So what databases did Hickey use? We want to verify them because they are in obvious conflict with US crime statistics that we can review. Once agian, we know from the onset that the OP to this thread was highly inaccurate because several mass murders, not serial killers, were incorrectly included in it. Just because a person kills several people doesn't make them a serial killer nor does even killing several people over an extended period of time make a person a serial killer. There are specific criteria for serial killers and not all that many individuals meet that criteria. For example, I don't believe the number "800 serial killers" in the United States during the 20th Century it accurate. I believe it's polluted with individuals that don't meet the specific requirements of being a serial killer.

 

So, Eric W. Hickey, a criminal psychology professor at California State University at Fresno, states:

What do you think that means people? 2.2% or 22%?

*facepalm*

If you have better data you are welcome to present it.

Otherwise please stop making up lies.

You pulled "90% of serial killers are white" out of your @ss, now you are basing your analysis of other statistics on it.

This is totally disingenuous.

 

22% of minority serial killers...

 

So why would Professor of Criminology Hickey say "It's a stereotype that . . . most serial killers are white"?

Why would all of the other databases report around 20% black serial killers?

If 22% of minority serial killers from 1800 in the U.S. were black, what race were the others? Native American?

22% of serial killers in the U.S. are black.

Fail.