QUOTES,STRAIGHT FROM THEIR OWN (*)(*)(*)(*)ING MOUTHS.>>>> but first let me say I know it is hard for some to admit that they have been utterly duped about their history. We have all been duped,brainwashed endlessly by tv and Hollywood. Your knowledge of history is WRONG. Jews were the slave traders in the Caribbean a full century before any slave was brought to N. America,mainly by JEWS..Today Jews still are in the white slave trade in Israel,anything to make a shekel.Obviously I am not implying there werent Europeans involved in the trade,and ownership,but no where near the % youve been led to believe.Video at bottom of page. QUOTES,STRAIGHT FROM THEIR OWN (*)(*)(*)(*)ING MOUTHS.>>>> Dr. Arnold Wiznitzer "The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of JEWS. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always JEWS, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates....If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644." Jews in Colonial Brazil (1960), pp. 72-3; [Note: Wiznitzer, Arnold Aharon, educator; Born in Austria, December 20, 1899; Ph.D., University of Vienna, 1920; Doctor of Hebrew Literature, Jewish Theological Seminary of America; Emeritus research professor, University of Judaism, Los Angeles; Contributor to historical journals in the United States and Brazil including the Journal of Jewish Social Studies and the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society. Former president, Brazilian-Jewish Institute of Historical Research.] Dr. Seymour B. Liebman "They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the JEWS were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale....[They] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a JEWISH enterprise....The ships were not only owned by JEWS, but were manned by JEWISH crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains." New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten (KTAV, New York, 1982), pp. 170, 183. [Liebman is an attorney; LL.B., St. Lawrence University, 1929; M.A. (Latin American history), Mexico City College, 1963; Florida chapter American Jewish Historical Society, 1956-58; Friends of Hebrew University, 1958-59; American Historical Society Contributor to scholarly journals on Jewish history. Dr. Herbert I. Bloom "The Christian inhabitants [of Brazil] were envious because the JEWS owned some of the best plantations in the river valley of Pernambuco and were among the leading slave-holders and slave traders in the colony."1 "Slave trade [sic] was one of the most important Jewish activities here [in Surinam] as elsewhere in the colonies."2 1. , "A Study of Brazilian Jewish History 1623-1654, Based Chiefly Upon the Findings of the Late Samuel Oppenheim," Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, vol. 33 (1934), p. 63. 2. The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Port Washington, New York/London: Kennikat Press, 1937), p. 159. [Bloom is a rabbi with degrees from Columbia University, Jewish Institute of Religion] Rabbi Bertram W. Korn "It would seem to be realistic to conclude that any Jew who could afford to own slaves and had need for their services would do so....Jews participated in every aspect and process of the exploitation of the defenseless blacks." From “Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865," Dr. Korn is a rabbi, historian with degrees from Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Cincinnati. Dr. Abraham J. Peck, American Jewish Archives “The first two centuries of the Black-Jewish encounter in America were highlighted by a fairly extensive record of JEWISH slave-holding. Indeed, during the colonial period, in the small Jewish community of the time, almost every Jewish household of any form, North or South, possessed at least one slave.” From the exhibit “Blacks and Jews: The American Experience: 1654-1992,” presented by Hebrew Union College, Jewish Institute of Religion, the American Jewish Archives, and the America Jewish Committee. Jacob Rader Marcus "All through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth, Jews in the North were to own black servants; in the South, the few plantations owned by Jews were tilled with slave labor. In 1820, over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic servants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish householders in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South, where they were always outnumbered at least 100 to 1....But very few Jews anywhere in the United States protested against chattel slavery on moral grounds." United States Jewry, 1776-1985 (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1989), p. 586. Rep. Julius Kahn In turn-of-the-century San Francisco the 12-term Congressman Julius Kahn was a Jew who was affiliated with Temple Emanu El. "The oath to the Japanese," he said, "would be but a hollow mockery, an empty formality signifying nothing. We do not want that kind of citizenship, and we do not intend to have it, if we can prevent it." He spoke vehemently against Japanese immigration and naturalization even as Jews pushed mightily for Eastern European immigration. The early 1900 saw passage of the Chinese Exclusion Acts which were enthusiastically supported by Kahn and his constituents. He was such an advocate that the Acts were called the Kahn Exclusion Acts. WHO BROUGHT THE SLAVES TO AMERICA?..VIDEO http://www.honestmediatoday.com/who_brought_the_slaves_to_america.htm
Our good friends over at Stormfront and beyond (including my pal David Duke) have not only been aware of the monopolization of joo slave trading in America, but we've spoken and written about it many times over--even giving names of the joo slave traders in America in documentation form. Of course, the liberal elite, the joo media and duped liberal elite whites will deny or eschew any and all facts pertaining to joo slave traders. I read a book titled "Why are joos liberal?" Their invovement with this slave trading business is just one of their dirty little secrets that puts them in good stead with the entire democrapic party.
Bla bla bla "Jews"....Bla bla bla "evil'...."bla bla bla "masters of the world..." Heard it all before.....and I should add that there were barely any slave-owning Jews in America during the slave trade.
One of the reasons why your people remain mired in misery and poverty is simply because of your ignorance to American historical facts, and perhaps of your sick dependence of your joo slave masters--21st century style. Check out the following link that goes into a little detail about joo slave trading in America during the 18th century. Especially scroll down to the end where the author lists the names of some of the more prominent slave ships and of the jooish names of the owners of those ships. Please enjoy without feeling too embarrassed over your ignorance of American history. http://www.rense.com/general69/invo.htm As a bonus I'll leave you with a great utube video on the joo slave trading. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL9hGmfGTXc"]Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade - YouTube[/ame]
What's the actual point of this thread? Is the unspoken conclusion meant to be that because some proportion of the American slave traders were American Jews, Jews today are bad? I think my choice of wording highlights the flaw with that argument. If it's a suggestion that Jews are unwilling to accept their ancestors involvement in the slave trade then I suspect there is a major element of truth in that but I doubt it's greater than the unwillingness shared by members of all the other groups of people who were also involved (which I suspect, one way or another, includes every one of us), especially if that association is going to be used to attack us today.
The slave trade was run from Britain, Liverpool and Bristol mostly, and I've never heard that any Jews were engaged in it - they tended to be small-time money lenders at best and you needed a lot more capital than they could call on. Slavery was one of the many ways in which the British aristocracy demonstrated that it was as foul as anyone on earth, till the mass of people swung in behind Wilberforce and stopped 'em.
I thought the OP was quite self explanatory in that people (especially blacks) have been duped into believing that it was the WHITE man (especially our founders) that were responsible for all of their slave woes. When in reality, it was the joos who were heavily invested in the slave trade; and it was the joos who still control much of the 21st century woes and enslavement of a dependent black race of people. You see, one can not get to cure an illness until one gets to the root problem or cause of said problem. Whites in America have long been the easy scapegoat for blacks (liberal blacks) to use in venting their chronic complaints that only a minority under the control of the joos would continue to use. And the ironic thing here is that liberal whites have been duped into believing or in to feeling guilty that they are are indeed responsible for the black woes of today.
What does all this stuff mean? The slaves were transported as part of a triangular shipping run - trade goods to West Africa, slaves to America, tobacco or sugar back to Britain. What Americans could possibly have managed anything so complicated and capital-intensive, and how? You are imposing your fantasies on history: at that time American traders were very small beer, and when the Slave Trade was abolished nothing but water.
Evidently you didn't watch the video or read the link that gave you the names of the joo slave ships and the joo owners of said ships. These joo slave traders not only dealt with the transportation of slaves but they had residences here in America where they carried that slave trade over to their slave estates for the benefit of their private property farm businesses.
No - you are right: I never follow video links, believing that if people have anything to say they should say it, giving checkable sources. I do know a little about the Slave Trade, however, and about the nature of British society up to the Abolition, and the evidence for Jewish importance in it has not reached me at all.
Yeah, bout all I can suggest is that you read up a little more of the American joo slave trade before coming on here to announce your ignorance to it.
Practically every evil blamed on the White man was actually perpetuated by Jews. Jews are very sneaky and can easily manipulate people into thinking whatever they do is right. By way of deception, thou shalt do war.
Right from the first 10 seconds in the video, I can already tell it's nothing less than propaganda. Jews "dominating" the slave trade is a lie, Jews practiced it but they were a serious minority in doing so compared to just about everyone else. And real historians agree.
All that article seems to say is Jews couldn't do it because they were a minority. No facts or evidence to back it up. Well, we all know Jews are a minority of the world's entire population, yet they have no problem controlling the world via money and power, do they? Weak argument.
But somehow "controlling the world via money and power" is an infallible argument? No, that's not a stupid and baseless cliche statement at all
Doesn't matter who steered the ships. What matters is how slaves were treated here in the states when they arrived. African slaves could have been freed as soon as they arrived on American soil after 1789. However they weren't. They were treated as less than human in a country founded on the principles of Freedom, equality, and justice. That's the point.
It is a point, and an important one, but we were discussing the slave trade. After Britain abolished it I don't think there were many slavers ready to dare risk annoying the British Navy, so I take it that all this 'dominating of the trade' means of markets in America. Or are we in a parallel universe somewhere?
According to many, slavery was a very costly practice in America and the profit wasn't as big as the spending.
