POLL: Did Iran have a hand in 911?

It is a lust for the defence of Israel from those committed to our destruction. If Iran gives up its call for our destruction, Iran will be safe from us. But Iran wishes to exterminate us, so Iran is therefore at great risk from us. Iran recognizes that if they attempt to destroy us, they will cease to exist. They are acting with a lack of intelligence until and unless they drop their call for our extermination.

God bless American and Israeli soldiers in any prospective war on Iran.

 

Exactly it is a terror motivated rogue country who wants the complete annihilation of Jews. See what they did in Buenos Aires Argentina on July 18, 1994

AMIA bombing in Buenos Aires Argentina July 18, 1994

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMIA_bombing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:atentado_AMIA.jpg

 

Which one???????????????????????????
You have two flags... are you binational... are you an emigrant that fell in love with the host country?

 

funny, cause a few days ago you said that unless Iran kills all its leaders, recognizes Israel, and opens its oil industry to American business, Iran would be destroyed.

change of heart?

 

ArmySoldier conveniently overlooked those words.

He also overlooked the fact that Iran has NOT called for Israel's destruction.

 

from your site:



"According to a report in The Nation, the author claims that James Cheek, United States Ambassador to Argentina at the time of the bombing, told him, "To my knowledge, there was never any real evidence [of Iranian responsibility]. They never came up with anything." The hottest lead in the case, he recalled, was an Iranian defector named Manoucher Moatamer, who "supposedly had all this information." But Moatamer turned out to be only a dissatisfied low-ranking official without the knowledge of government decision-making that he had claimed. "We finally decided that he wasn't credible," Cheek recalled. [61]
In 2013, investigative journalist Gareth Porter cast doubt on the alleged involvement of Iran and Hezbollah, reporting that the link depended centrally on just claims from the MEK, a controversial Iranian anti-regime group that has been described as terrorist. [62]"



No proof.

By the way, MEK (the "source" for this claim) is an ENEMY terrorist of the Iranian government.

 

They do? Good thing for Iran, then. The Israeli regime is about as nefarious as the Nazi one was.

Why should we care? Believing that it happenned or not won't change anything - it won't change the fat compensations Jews receive from Germany to this day, and it won't bring back those who died neither. The only country that should be forced to believe in the holocaust is Germany.

Is the holocaust some kind of religious tenet of your faith and that you apply with a witch-hunting zeal and hysteria? Should we make war on, say, people that believe that Darius won the Gaugamela battle as well?

MOD EDIT - Rule 3

 

Hitler, is that you?

 

You ask me if I am the facist (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)?

I don't even think you realize the irony, do you?

Being a Nazi has nothing to do with hating Jews - It has to do with propaganda, disinformation, fairy tales, mob rules, hatred, belief in uber- and unter-races, ultra-nationalism, violence, over-militarisation and disrespect of human rights.

The hat fits you much better than it does me. No me, I'm Elvis.

 

Nazi had a lot to do with hating jews. They slaughted 6 million of them. And you also support the slaughter of the rest of them, as you posted above.

Nice work.

 

Okay, so if the Nazis were after the arabs instead of the Jews, they wouldn't be Nazis, but good guys, is that it?

God it's impossible to discuss anything that it isn't superficial or first degree with you FOX lummoxes.

 

True. But supporting the extermination of Terrorists is legitimate and moral.

 

Lol what are you babbling about? and what does Fox News, or MSNBC, or any of the MSM have to do with anything we're talking about? We're talking about how you support the destruction of the jews. Everything else you're spouting out is strangely irrelevant.

 

I do support the destruction of the zionist regime of Israel, as I would have supported the destruction of the Nazi regime - for pretty much the same reasons. I'm the bleeding heart liberal here, remember? Likewise you are the ultra-nationalistic intolerant chickenhawk. >>>MOD EDIT Off Topic Removed<<<

That doesn't mean that I hate jews or Germans. Neithurei Kharta also support the destruction of the zionist state of Israel. Does that make them nazis too, according to your retarded standards? Come on - entertain me some more, for (*)(*)(*)(*)'s sake.

 

Haha, the two aren't comparable. The nazis slaughtered 6 million jews, and now he supports Iran slaughtering the rest.

>>>MOD EDIT Off Topic Removed<<<

 

You're damn right, Ronstar - I still don't see how one can attack Nazi Germany but support Zionist Israel, apart for hypocrisy.

 

calling for the death of all Muslim terrorists is the same as Hitler kill 6 million Jews?

that suggests that all Muslims in The West are terrorists, and is very Islamophobic.

 

How so?

Tell that to the other guy. Don't you get PC at my expenses, dude - it won't work on me.

 

Targeting Muslim terrorists means targeting less than .1% of Muslims.

Hitler targeted every single Jew on Earth, regardless of their political or religious allegiances.

>>>MOD EDIT Flamebait Removed<<<

 

Tell that to the other guy. You're preaching to the choir here.

 

That's not true - Hitler had good contacts with some zionist Jews already in the levant. Makes sense, since they more or less followed the same "uber-race" ideology.

Furthermore, the Final Solution was adopted in 1941 - two years into a real war. In 1937, the Jews of Germany fared about as well as the 2014 Arabs of Palestine. Just wait until Israel gets in a real war, and then we'll talk. My analogy is rock-solid.

 

[MENTION=66287]MVictorP[/MENTION] said that killing all Islamic-extremist terrorists= killing all Muslims.

- - - Updated - - -

so you're saying all Muslims are terrorists?

>>>MOD EDIT Off Topic Removed<<<

 

MVictorP, contrary to your claim, most Muslims are NOT terrorists.

a war on Muslim extremist terrorists would affect less than .1% of Muslims in The West.

 

Yes, we need a war upon Muslim extremists in The West.

and we need to support moderate Muslims and get them to help us.

 

You like building strawmen, don't you. It's understandable; Strawmen are a lot less pugnacious than I am. First you suggested that I am an Arab/Muslim (and to belong what god-knows-what fringe group of your invention), and then you accused me of being a racist bigot against Muslims? Make up your mind, Ronstar, and when you'll be less, eerr, confused, then come back and we'll discuss as much as the PC correction on this board permits it.