Pres. Trump Wants Rep. Adam Schiff Arrested For Treason

Of course not, that's why the liberal one world order freaks hate Trump.

As for being stupid, well if someone could become a billionaire at the age of 30 and pull NYC our of its recession, then all of us smart people should be trillionaires.

 

LOLOl.. You sure don't know anything about Trump's track record..

 

For those who care about the rule of law (instead of only pretending to care about the rule of law and then calling it treason when applied to the President), it is a problem. It is swinging a lot of independents. The "Them durn libruls" defense isn't going to hold water.

 

You should have such a track record. Looks like Trump has you beat by a billion miles.

 

LOL, what law was broken other than the law of the dem clown show butt hurt over 2016? Show us the US Code.

 

Hahaha.. Why do you think NO US banks will touch Trump?

 

It is illegal to solicit or anything of value to help a campaign from a foreign source. Everyone knows that at this point.

 

Hahaha...why do you think you are not rich and President?

 

Guess that means Obama has you beat. Funny how this argument only cropped up when Trump came to power.

 

It isn't illegal to ask to investigate corruption and since it was reported in the news and Biden bragged about it and we have a treaty with Ukraine for just that, what law was broken. Are you saying that what Hillary did is now illegal? Are you saying that all you have to do to not be investigated for corruption is throw your hat in the ring. Oh the hypocrisy after the left defended the investigation into Trump that went nowhere due to being a hoax.

 

You mean using his office to enrich himself instead of working?

 

Trump wants this investigation for his personal interests. To help his campaign. He needs to stop breaking the law. His followers need to start caring about the law.

Refer to the past dozen or so times I've agreed that Clinton should have been investigated for the same. As if fake whataboutist arguments weren't intellectually dishonest enough, you can't even get the hypocrisy accusation right.

 

God this is hilarious. One post after accusing people of hypocrisy, we have the most glaring example of hypocrisy possible.

 

No I didn't, and the fact that you posted it in a way that would give the impression to others that Trump wants to bodily harm the CIA informer, doesn't say much for your intent now does it?

DEMOCRATS​

.

HEE HAW!
​

Go on, tell others what we do
so we can flip it back to you,
and give to you the public shame
for daring to destroy our game. - Jeannette



​

 

You're still at it. We don't indict sitting Presidents.

The Mueller report:

Third, we considered whether to evaluate the conduct we investigated under the Justice Manual standards governing prosecution and declination decisions, but we determined not to apply an approach that could potentially result in a judgment that the President committed crimes. The threshold step under the Justice Manual standards is to assess whether a person’s conduct “constitutes a federal offense.” U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Justice Manual § 9-27.220. Fairness concerns counseled against potentially reaching that judgment when no charges can be brought. The ordinary means for an individual to respond to an accusation is through a speedy and public trial, with all the procedural protections that surround a criminal case. An individual who believes he was wrongly accused can use that process to seek to clear his name. In contrast, a prosecutor’s judgment that crimes were committed, but that no charges will be brought, affords no such adversarial opportunity for public name-clearing before an impartial adjudicator.​

The concerns about the fairness of such a determination would be heightened in the case of a sitting President, where a federal prosecutor’s accusation of a crime, even in an internal report, could carry consequences that extend beyond the realm of criminal justice. OLC noted similar concerns about sealed indictments. Even if an indictment were sealed during the President’s term, OLC reasoned, “it would be very difficult to preserve [an indictment’s] secrecy,” and if an indictment became public, “[t]he stigma and opprobrium” could imperil the President’s ability to govern.” Although a prosecutor’s internal report would not represent a formal public accusation akin to an indictment, the possibility of the report’s public disclosure and the absence of a neutral adjudicatory forum to review its findings counseled against potentially determining “that the person’s conduct constitutes a federal offense.” Justice Manual § 9-27.220.​

Mueller made it clear he wouldn't be accusing the President of a crime.

Stop gaslighting the forum.

 

If you had read the Mueller report, you'd know there was Russian interference in our election and Trump's bleating about the investigation into his possible involvement being a "hoax" is BS.

 

LOL, media reported on it and Biden bragged about it. The investigation into it ended before the Mueller report came out.

 

I know, you think getting rich by going into politics is hunky dory.

 

More of your baseless charges.

I suppose it should go without saying, but it's possible to advocate for world government without being treasonous. How so? We would democratically decide under the Constitution to join a world government.

Why hasn't the Trump DoJ prosecuted Hillary?

 

Apparently, you think leveling false charges against debate opponents is "hunky dory."

 

How’s the deficit?hows manufacturing? How’s draining the swamp?hows national unity? How’s healthcare ?..... And we’re gaslighted??
Wonder why mueller said, if he could vindicate trump he would have said so.

 

It’s another conspiracy...I think #3669

 

False charges when the guy bragged about it? LOL

 

Thanks for proving my point.