Proof of 9/11 conspiracy doesn't require any knowledge of physics

Discussion in '9/11' started by dfisher22, Sep 7, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. dfisher22

    dfisher22 Newly Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I find it interesting that researchers tend to hyper-focus on how the buildings came down. A proper investigation should start by looking at personal associations and the characters involved. That would take you to Sarasota and Venice, Florida. This is where the hijackers converged, lived, and learned to fly.

    Researching the tiny flight schools involved, you'd uncover a drug running operation with ties to the CIA and individuals connected to the Iran-contra affair. Reading the local papers, the government's portrait of Atta falls apart.

    Daniel Hopsicker is an investigative reporter from the Venice area and had been writing about some of these characters before 9/11. His documentary can be seen here, but I suggest you read the book Welcome to Terrorland.

    [video=youtube;Q6W4L-HK-Os]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6W4L-HK-Os[/video]

    After Hopsicker wrote his book claiming that Ruddi Dekkers and the other flight school owners were government drug traffickers, he was vindicated when Dekkers was arrested for exactly that.

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlin...ers-flight-school-faces-drug-running-charges/

    Dekkers was a career criminal. He was wanted in his home country for embezzlement, and prosecutors claimed he was working with organized crime. He was investigated in the US for illegally smuggling high tech computer chips.
     
  2. Vlad Ivx

    Vlad Ivx Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    People talk too much about the destroyed buildings as if it makes a difference. Truthers focus too much on engineering, science, the numbers needed to calculate what could and couldn't have happened physically. They do too little of the usual detective work, like discuss connections of main suspects, key people, events before and after 9/11 etc. There is just so much material to be checked out. So many documents, characters, many puzzling official statements and papers. If I were to thoroughly read, research and bring everything to this forum, it would mean dropping everything in my life and spending months here, day by day, starting from the ideologies of Cheney's student group back in the 1960s.
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,258
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
  4. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Rubbish! 7th and 8th graders should have been explaining why airliners could not do that in the first month.

    The bottoms of skyscrapers must be stronger and heavier than the tops to hold the tops up. So why doesn't everybody expect to be given accurate data on the amounts of steel and concrete on every level?

    The amazing thing about the 9/11 Affair is the 13 years of stupidity.

    psik
     
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,854
    Likes Received:
    3,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You say that you KNOW that there were hijackers,
    Please share with us your INFORMATION that proves without any doubt, that hijacked airliners were used as weapons that day(?)
     
  7. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,854
    Likes Received:
    3,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's been shared and you know it quite well.

    The evidence is overwhelming and you know it and you have seen it time and again.

    On the other hand it is you without a speck of evidence to support your counter claims.
     
  8. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    sign of a truly closed mind......

    "not a speck of evidence" ...... thank U very much.
     
  9. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thank goodness Dekkers got caught.
     

Share This Page