If you were a marriage minister, would you legally 'wed' two people if you knew in advance that they would cheat on one another?
how does one become a marriage minister? https://theamm.org/ Become an AMM Minister. It's Free! Perform Marriage for Friends and Family! American Marriage Ministries is a non-denominational, interfaith Church, where you can become ordained to perform marriage. We are a Federally Recognized 501(c)3 Public Charitable Organization as described by the IRS. Our spiritual mission is to ensure that all people have the right to perform marriages. We ordain people of all religious beliefs and philosophies that agree to our three core tenets: The definition of the word 'Church' is now needed to be clarified. church : a building that is used for Christian religious services; religious services held in a church; a particular Christian group. If any member of any 'religion' can perform the AMM marriages, then the word 'Church' that the AMM site uses should be clarified.
it is sentences such as this that put people into confusion and that makes it difficult for a person to know what is and what isn't.
if there is separation of Church and State or State and Church, how are State officials allowed to use Church material without getting proper permission, as well as the Church officials using State material without getting proper permission? If the word 'Church' is a term that anybody can use, and if a statement made about the Church is wrong, wouldn't that be considered, libel or slander, according to the Defamation Law? Defamation Law Made Simple: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/defamation-law-made-simple-29718.html
In a reverse way, it would similar to Church posting ads and businesses that claim that the U.S. government is Communist or Dictatorial and selling that propaganda to the public. - - - Updated - - - I'm sure defamation Lawyers would know how to get past the rubbish and get to the heart of 'slander' and 'libel' if needed be.
A quick question. Are self written opinionated hand-outs with information of any entity, whether the statement be false or true, be held as 'standing evidence' in the Court of Law? - - - Updated - - - so if that were the case, any 'undisclosed information' handed onto the authorities as 'tips' would be considered 'libel or slander?' - - - Updated - - - Would giving FBI information about Omar Mateen's past doings be considered libel (if written) or slander (if spoken) if the information given to the FBI were false? - - - Updated - - - Or would publishing articles of how a certain gun shop that caters to affiliated terrorists, to stop local customers from being involved, be considered slander or libel, if that were the case? - - - Updated - - - in other words, what is libel or slander? If the information is being handed to authorities rather than the general customers? And... how is the U.S. government NOT being slandered or having libel against them everyday?
Would any postings, articles or any tidbits about how Mr. Obama is the anti-christ be considered libel or slander? Would any postings, articles or any tidbits about Mr. Joe Blow as a person of 'repute' that shows how he frequents transgenders while away from his family be considered slander or libel?? So are there NO such things occurring? - - - Updated - - - So there is a distinguishing line between offering information to the general public and offering information to private Authorities, such as State Law. - - - Updated - - - And besides, how would anyone get a personal letter to State or Federal Authorities off of your personal computer anyways??? - - - Updated - - - Unless of course, the whole system of local politics is led by organized crime..
And, once again, if this were to be the case, how would any information about any criminal activity be handed over in to Authorities if there were NO substantial evidence handed in with the information?? Then that would be the end of 'tips' being given to Authorities.
And/But at the same time, if Authorities do nothing about and with the tips being handed in, then the public shouldn't even be concerned over crime. So, if a tip comes in about a drug dealing house and nothing is done, then I guess the 'tipster' is in more 'fear' of being known than if he/she never volunteered to help the community in the first place. Would Law get involved if the 'tip' was about a cartel leader? Do police or authorities not waste time on the 'lower' ones and only focus on the 'higher' ones?
But 'cartel leaders' cannot be tipped about by the general public. The 'cartel leaders' are way in hiding, or not. They usually stay away from getting their hands too dirty and so they have others to do their 'dirty' work.
how could any person believe that someone who is in responsibility of millions or billions of dollars per year in crime monies would be so careless as to live in any neighborhood where 'tips' are being called in? They are very very disclosed persons/people..
but i have been in a Court room where the presiding Judge demanded a person get a public defender, to not plead guilty, and to not pay the local fines; after the person desired to plead guilty, pay the fines and move on with his day and week.
As the other previous people with the same charge were allowed to do before his hearing... - - - Updated - - - I believe the charge against him was being in a park after the park had closed... - - - Updated - - - in fact, it was probably his first offense and that is why the Judge ordered him to a public defender.. His second offense, if he should have one, he will have the rights to waive the public defender and plead guilty and pay the fine. - - - Updated - - - I wonder if it is mandatory for a public defender to be with you on your first offense???
for a plead of 'no contest' there might need be a public defender, but for a plead of 'guilty' I'm not sure... - - - Updated - - - what's scary though, is that the Judge went to school, got his JD, was a lawyer first, and then moved upward into the seat of a Presiding Judge in a Courtroom.
