Racial Violence Under-reported

Discussion in 'Law & Justice' started by MisLed, Aug 15, 2012.

  1. MisLed

    MisLed New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    7,299
    Likes Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/see-no-evil-racial-violence-underreported/

    Published: 2 days ago

    by COLIN FLAHERTY

    (Colin Flaherty is an award-winning reporter and author of "White Girl Bleed a Lot: The return of racial violence to America and how the media ignore it." Follow him on Twitter.)

    Excerpt:

    Racial violence might be up. It might be down. Either way we may never know: A new study from the Department of Justice says victims of violent crime often do not call the police.

    And if they do, police often do not file crime reports, say local newspapers around the country.

    “More than half of the nation’s violent crimes, or nearly 3.4 million violent victimizations per year, went unreported to the police between 2006 and 2010,” said a Justice Department analysis.

    That’s 17 million violent crimes off the books in five years.

    Some say it is even worse. They point to the experience that cities around America are having with ShotSpotter: An anti-crime technology that features an array of wireless microphones that can pinpoint the location of a gun shot to within 40 feet.

    The system is 96 percent accurate.

    Using ShotSpotter, the New York Times reports that neighbors called police only 10 percent of the time guns were fired in a high-crime area of San Francisco. In Oakland, 22 percent of gunshots prompted 9-1-1 calls.

    Chief Chris Magnus of Richmond, Calif., a community of 120,000 north of Berkeley that routinely ranks among country’s most violent cities, recalled listening to a ShotSpotter recording of a gun battle in 2010 that involved more than 100 rounds fired from four guns.

    “It was just mind-boggling,” he said. “This is like 11 at night on a summer night, and nobody even called it in.”

    And often when people “call it in,” the police do not file a report, further skewing the statistics in places like Baltimore, New York, Chicago, Seattle, Atlanta, Minneapolis and Milwaukee.

    In Queens, a New York Times headline reports, “A new police tactic: Keeping crime off the books.”

    New York police refused to take a report when a man groped Jill Korber several days in a row.

    “He told me it would be a waste of time, because I didn’t know who the guy was or where he worked or anything,” said Ms. Korber, 34, a schoolteacher. “His words to me were, ‘These things happen.’ He said those words.”

    Katherine Davis told the Times she hid in a closet when a man entered her apartment, searched the room and left.

    After the police arrived and questioned Davis, she asked for a case number so she could follow the investigation. “There is no case number,” they told her.

    In Milwaukee, 50 black people looted a convenience store in 2011. Then they moved to a nearby park where they assaulted 10 people having a Fourth of July picnic.

    The following day, several of the victims went to the police station to learn about the status of their case. “What case?” asked the officer on duty. There was no report. Eventually, after pressure from talk radio and television reporters, police launched an investigation.

    Less than one year later, a headline in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel said it all:

    “Hundreds of assault cases misreported by Milwaukee police department. City’s violent crime rate lowered based on faulty data.”

    In Minneapolis, a talk show host at the CBS affiliate was patiently explaining to his listeners how a recent epidemic of racial violence in that city was an anomaly. And he refused to believe police and newspapers were ignoring it.

    A caller named Haley soon set him straight when she told him about how a black mob beat her son, breaking several bones in his face.

    The incident is recounted in “White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How The Media Ignore It.”

    Haley set out to find the criminals. And “nobody did anything about it,” she said. They would not look at security cameras video tape. They would not help her look at it. “But they didn’t care. I get flamed up thinking about it. They basically told me they had bigger fish to fry.”

    In Riverhead, N.Y., neighboring the Hamptons on Long Island, 750 black people were fighting and destroying property in the street at 2 a.m. The violence was so intense the local police issued a Code 3 emergency call for help from five surrounding police departments.

    Stories from nearby newspapers, interviews with local police officers and postings on local Internet sites and Twitter confirmed the nature and extent of the racial violence.

    But the locals wanted nothing to do with this July 2012 incident: The editor of a local newsletter denied anything at all had happened to disturb the peace in her bucolic neighborhood: “I know this even though I wasn’t there – because there were no arrests. If there had been lawlessness and violence, there would have been arrests.”

    Riverhead City Councilman John Dunleavy added: “This was simply a very large block party, with no incidents, and no action had to be taken.”
     
  2. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What a well thought out and articulated position. Your commentary is convincing, and the case you put together is indeed very powerful.

    there was a time in my life where I would have simply said, "in before it's closed" due to the glaring fact that this obviously does not meet the criteria for a thread, but now I do like analyzing the situation a bit more.

    Tell me, before I click on your link to who knows where, what does it actually say?
     

Share This Page