Racist Netanyahu lectures UK govt.

See.

Here we go - yet again.

Last week we had this demented state wailing like a spoiled child over some circumcision issue in Europe. Last week also saw one million Israeli's/Jews(call them what you want) on the streets paying homage to their spiritual racist, Rabbi Yosef, who had died.

A couple of weeks ago we had their elected leader, this Jewish supremacist, Netenyahu, stand before the UN and tell lies and make racist comments about non Jews.

And now this...


**

Racist Netanyahu lectures UK govt. not to restore Iran ties


The Prime Minister of Zionist Regime of Israel has been lecturing the UK government not to restore diplomatic relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran, telling Britain make any possible rapprochement conditional.


Benjamin Netanyahu, who believes his years of Iranophobia attempts are reaching a dead end with the recent diplomatic outreach launched by the government of new Iranian President Rouhani, is conspiring yet another deceit campaign in and around Europe to prevent a possible thaw in the Islamic Republic’s relations with the west.

Worse than the deceit campaign, the Zionist regime’s premier is explicitly telling Europe, Britain in particular, to introduce conditions to Iran if they want to restore bilateral relations.

The premier of the occupying regime has called on the UK government to condition its restoration of full diplomatic ties with Iran on the Islamic Republic ending its calls for the destruction of Israel.

“Iran is calling for the annihilation of the Jewish state and of a member state of the UN,” Netanyahu told the Financial Times. “It seems sensible that Britain would say, ‘Before we reestablish diplomatic relations, abandon this.’”


As part of his fear-mongering campaign against Iran, the premier of the occupying regime has taken with him the regime’s head of National Security Council Yaakov Amidror and Spying Minister Yuval Steinitz to Europe in desperate attempts to force its European allies to keep the pressure on the Iranian nation through illegal, barbaric sanctions ahead of the Geneva talks between Iran and the so-called G5+1 countries comprising Russia, China, the U.S., Britain, France and Germany over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear energy program.


The new Iranian diplomatic approach has made such a storm across the U.S. and Europe, that the premier of the occupying regime felt the need to take his Iranophobia offensive to the streets both across Europe and in the U.S.

Last week, Netanyahu bombarded the U.S. media market with some 8 interviews, all of which were directed against Iran as part of his scare-mongering attempts.

In Europe too, He arranged multiple interviews with media outlets and newspapers in Britain, France and Germany to further his anti-Iran agenda.

As far as illegal, illegitimate anti-Iran sanctions are concerned, Netanyahu moaned “if the sanctions are relieved, the whole sanctions regime will collapse".

“So they’ll get everything, and we - the collective we - will get nothing. If it falls on me to say something that everybody understands, I’ll say it. And don’t say I didn’t warn you”, boasted the premier of racist regime of Israel. (Don't make threats to us punk)

“At this juncture, we have to say things clearly, and the clear thing is this: Iran should not have centrifuges; it should not have plutonium plants. These things should be completely dismantled”. (What about your 400+ warheads punk?)

Isn’t it ridiculous?

The premier of a racist regime, which has been established by force and through occupying the lands of a historic nation, a regime which does not even comply with the smallest rules and regulations adopted by the United Nations, a regime that has been massacring defenceless, innocent women and children in Gaza through its inhumane siege of the Strip, a regime whose armed-to-teeth gangs of troops kill Palestinians in the occupied West Bank on a daily basis, a regime whose jails are full of Palestinian teens who are tortured and abused by wild prison guards, and more importantly, a regime which has stockpiled hundreds of nukes and various weapons of mass destructions in total defiance of the international community, this regime is saying that “Iran should not have centrifuges”, while Iran as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and a committed member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has each and every right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

Now it’s with the history to decide whether an implacable, racist regime with unlimited ambitions and aggression should have the ability, with no supervision, to develop nukes in defiance of all international laws and regulations, while at the same time the Islamic Republic of Iran, whose nuclear energy activities are monitored, round-the-clock by the IAEA-installed cameras and inspectors, should not be able to enjoy its basic rights which is entitled to as enshrined by international rules and regulations.

Other reports had it that Netanyahu phoned British Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Francois Hollande to urge them not to ease sanctions against Iran.

As far as Britain and the Israeli Prime Minister’s fear-mongering campaign are concerned, the UK foreign secretary William Hague announced recently that his country was in talks with the Islamic Republic of Iran to re-establish bilateral ties severed almost two years ago.

Britain unilaterally cut its bilateral relations with Iran and closed its embassy in Tehran in November 2011 after a group of people, angry with the UK’s anti-Iranian policies, staged a protest in front of the embassy building and inflicted some damages on its gate and walls. Actually, Britons did not allow the then Iranian government to investigate what has happened and rushed to declare a severance of bilateral ties by expelling Iranian diplomats in London and closing the embassy there.

Now, racist regime of Israel is scared of a possible thaw in relations between Tehran and London, which ultimately will add to Netanyahu’s isolation at the international scene.


http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/10/13/329105/ties/


Counter arguments..


1) It's Press TV, therefore not true as it is Persian.

2) Israel need nukes because they are the only democracy in a sea of Arab hoardes who want to push Jews into the sea.

3) Netenyahu is not racist

4) Israel do not meddle in the affairs of anyone else. They just want peace.

Etc...

 

That's why you do not get any responses, Jack. Nothing left to say.

 

.


I dunno. I think that this statement from the article is worth quoting ---






"Isn’t it ridiculous? The premier of a racist regime, which has been established by force and through occupying the lands of a historic nation, a regime which does not even comply with the smallest rules and regulations adopted by the United Nations, a regime that has been massacring defenseless, innocent women and children in Gaza through its inhumane siege of the Strip, a regime whose armed-to-teeth gangs of troops kill Palestinians in the occupied West Bank on a daily basis, a regime whose jails are full of Palestinian teens who are tortured and abused by wild prison guards, and more importantly, a regime which has stockpiled hundreds of nukes and various weapons of mass destructions in total defiance of the international community, this regime is saying that “Iran should not have centrifuges”, while Iran as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and a committed member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has each and every right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes."

 

You just responded!

With nothing to say!

But you're sort of right. The crybaby king of Israel (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)ing to the rest of the world and making childish demands of everyone else has certainly become a routine occurrence. And his message, as you affirm, is nothing much.

 

To begin your parallels are completely idiotic. Not to mention the fact that you are quoting a publication from a country that has vowed to wipe Israel off the map. You start by claiming that the Israeli PM was ranting like a spoiled child about an affront that does not affect only Jews. Ritual Circumcisions are also preformed by Muslims. So, the Council of Europe's decision, if actually implemented by the European nations, would also have an impact on Muslims. So, I guess that was very racist of Prime Minister Netanyahu for speaking out against the decision.

As far as the article that you quoted, it is nothing more then a pack of lies.

Btw, saying that the PM of Israel taking up for Jews racist is about as bad as calling a African PM racist for taking up for Blacks.

 

Aye okay then.

 

Pretty much all nations were established by force.

I take it you mean the area of land which was Jewish land, then Roman, then Caliphate, then Ottoman, then British then a ward of the UN but never it's own nation.

Please cite these Chapter seven rules.

According to Colonel Kemp the worlds foremost expert on urban warfare Israel has not done this but in fact has taken care not to do so while prosecuting this war on terrorism of their own people.

Interesting as nobody seems to get killed by these 'armed to the teeth gangs of troops' unless they are guilty of killing civilians.

Teens that were just sitting around playing Nintendo and were picked up huh?

No rule that says you can't own nukes.

Nope. The world is.

They sure do however, as a signatory they have to adhere to the rules of NPT which they have not and that, my dear Rammstein is the entire problem with Iran - they are not adhering to the rules and regulations of NPT.

 

Actually, that is factually wrong. They ARE adhering to the rules and regulations. Since the departure of Baraedi from the IAEA, the said agency has become overtly politicised. As for the partial views of Kemp, these are also heavily biased and politicised.

 

It's a wonder that Cameron and Hollande etc even give Netanyahu the time of day. They have more important things to be concerned about than some little warmongering state stuck out in the middle east.

 

Is it?

 

Im no Bibi fan but I gotta say if he makes these kind of ppl sooo upset, perhaps he is worth something after all...

 

Wrong.

Resolution 1929 states;

" Reaffirms that Iran shall cooperate fully with the IAEA on all outstanding issues, particularly those which give rise to concerns about the possible military dimensions of the Iranian nuclear
programme, including by providing access without delay to all sites, equipment, persons and documents requested by the IAEA, and stresses the importance of ensuring that the IAEA have all necessary
resources and authority for the fulfilment of its work in Iran; "

However, according to the IAEA report a couple of months ago, they have been in violation

IAEA Report Feb 21 2013

Summary

"While the Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material at the nuclear facilities and LOFs declared by Iran under its Safeguards Agreement, as Iran is not providing the necessary cooperation, including by not implementing its Additional Protocol, the Agency is unable to provide credible assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in
Iran, and therefore to conclude that all nuclear material in Iran is in peaceful activities.

It is a matter of concern that the extensive and significant activities which have taken place since February 2012 at the location within the Parchin site to which the Agency has repeatedly requested
access will have seriously undermined the Agency’s ability to undertake effective verification. The Agency reiterates its request that Iran, without further delay, provide both access to that location and
substantive answers to the Agency’s detailed questions regarding the Parchin site and the foreign expert. "

When did they allow for the inspections of the sites in question?

Hardly. The facts and figures of civilian/combatant ratio deaths due to Israeli actions are the lowest of all nations in all conflicts.

 

Cameron has also called Gaza a ''prison camp,'' and called for lifting the blockade.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Gaza-prison-camp-calls-lifting-blockade.html

Along with every other UN Security Council member, except the US, he also voted for a resolution demanding that Israel allow IAEA inspectors to inspect Israel's nuclear facilities.

 

The report you cite is skewed and distorted and is being used as a political weapon. That was my initial point that has clearly flown over your head. Kemp's views are heavily biased in favour of the pro-Israeli establishment position.

 

One of the stunning omissions in corporate media coverage of the IAEA report are the WikiLeaks disclosures concerning IAEA chief, Yukiya Amano. According to a US Embassy cable from a US diplomat in Vienna, where the IAEA is based, Amano described himself as ‘solidly in the U.S. court on every key strategic decision, from high-level personnel appointments to the handling of Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program.’

http://wikileaks.org/cable/2009/10/09UNVIEVIENNA478.html

 

Upset is the wrong word.

He is starting to look like the man who was told to come to a fancy dress party, only to turn up in costume and find out people were having him on.

 

Uh huh. Perhaps you will be so kind as to show us where the IAEA has given Iran a clean bill of health and has allowed them to inspect all facilities. As for Kemp, he merely sums up the fact I uttered where the civilian/combatant casualty ratio in the Israeli conflict is the lowest of any military on earth - ever. All due to the fact the Israelis take inordinate care to keep those rates low and minimize casualties in the Palestinians civilian population.

 

Was that before or after he became PM?

Besides, talk is cheap (as you know).

 

Reports' suggest former Colonel Richard Kemp is a religious fundamentalist motivated in his ideological support for Israel by a hard-line Christian Zionism.

http://barthsnotes.com/2013/07/26/us-christian-zionist-rally-includes-calls-to-attack-iran/

- - - Updated - - -

Strawmen.

 

He called Gaza a prison camp before he became PM.

I got two different UN votes confused. The UN Security Council vote concerned Israeli settlements:

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sc10178.doc.htm

And the UN vote on Israel's nukes was a General Assembly vote. It's possible that the UK abstained, but at least they didn't vote against it.

Exactly!

 

And his contention is backed up by hard facts.

Civilian casualty ratio

So when did they come into compliance with the IAEA and subsequently UNSC Resolution 1929?

When?

Pfft

 

I dunno, you seem rather upset in all your recent posts on him.

 

No.

Mostly I think he is a Jewish racist lying punk, one that should be put behind bars for warmongering.

If he were not so dangerous, some sort of comedy show on cable could be in order.

 

As usual, you use irelevant strawman arguments when the going gets tough. Again, cos it ain't sinking in, the IAEA cannot be trusted with anything since the political views of its head are heavily skewed in favour of the US. In other words, the IAEA, since Amano's appointment, is no longer credible.

Kemp's perspective on Israel is heavily skewed politically in favour of Israel.

 

Well then, Iran will forever be in violation of UNSC Resolution 1929 then unless they can convince this body that since they don't like him that they subsequently don't have to adhere to any of the Council's rulings. As for strawman, look the term up then spell out how I have invented an argument please rather than be guilty of just throwing words about like poo..

Yes but the figures were not his and they don't lie and they don't have bias.