Regarding sexualized drag shows for LITTLE CHILDREN:

Wow. That is blatant. Would your implied protective order, apply to all crossdressers, or just "drag queens?"

 

NBC’s Ben Collins: ‘An All Ages Drag Brunch … Is Not Some Hypersexual Event, But That’s What It’s Viewed As on the Far Right.’

In their hate narrative against American Parents, if you object to dragging children to drag show, you are for shooting up gay bars.

 

I thin

 

Whereas, on the Right, amongst its own groomers, it's "don't ask, don't tell."

 

Fake News. You are pretending that not sexualizing children = getting protection orders against crossdressers and drag queens.

IT GETS WORSE: Balenciaga’s ‘Cutting Edge’ Ad Campaign Used ‘Bondage Teddy Bears’ Held By Kids.



'Using very young children holding teddy bears dressed in bondage outfits? The outrageous, shocking use of children holding a beloved, fuzzy child’s companion dressed in a sexually suggestive outfit goes beyond “generating a buzz” and enters the realm of child pornography.'

Clearly the parent of the year signed off on this.

'One child stood on a couch while holding a purple teddy bear which was dressed in a bondage outfit, including leather straps wrapped around its neck connected to ruffled thigh straps, according to online screenshots. In another photo, a different child stood in front of a table of Balenciaga merchandise holding another bondage teddy bear; this stuffed animal wore a mesh shirt, had leather straps tied around its ankles and wrists along with a choker around its neck with a metal padlock attached. This bear also appeared to have dyed fur like that of a black eye.'



'There’s also a photo of a purse lying on top of some papers that include a copy of a Supreme Court decision that defined child pornography'

 

And so, those parents need not being their kids to "drag queen story hour." What is your point-- that we should outlaw, whatever it is that 60% of polled adults, do not think is appropriate?

You may want to think that through, a little more: it would mean no more assault rifles available to the general public, and then some, regarding gun legislation, just for starters. Who knows, it might even be the end for NASCAR.

 

I have no clue what you are trying to say. If you have a point to make, make it.

 

Outlaw it? Do you find yourself ever described as prone to exaggeration? We speak out against it, and we damn sure aren't going to fund it, and we will not sit silent while this filth is pushed through our schools.

We have an inherent right to rifles, and there are a number of appropriate topics on 2A if you wish to discuss that. Your claim about nascar makes no sense at all.

 

This OP is about a private, ticketed event (not held in a school). So, you are saying that your reply had nothing to do with the OP?

 

Fake News. This post is about several things, including small children and drag shows, my post dealt with both. Too many on the Left have dropped into this lazy habit of trying to rule points they can't refute as improper to be shared. You whiffed, again.

 

We should outlaw DQSH. I am not interested in those other issues.

 

Not as much as left wing pedophiles who want to indoctrinate children so they can prey upon them.

 

Your child has a better chance of getting abused at church than at a drag show.

 

I just did. You are asking me to accept this behaviour as normal which is allowing men to invade women spaces. That's forcing or demanding.

 

Nope....never asked you to accept the behavior as normal. Yet again you think something is being “demanded” of you when it’s not. Thanks for proving my point.

 

Pedophilia is not limited to-- nor am I aware of any data supporting the position that it is any more prevalent among-- the political Left, as opposed to the Right.

Get a clue.

 

Says noted authority on the subject, ToughTalk.

 

Not unlike right wing clergy pedophiles who want to indoctrinate children so they can prey upon them. Guess both sides have f’d up people.

 

On what, other than baseless bigotry, do you imply that "cross dressing men," have any greater proclivity for an "unnatural interest in being around children," than just "men," in general?

Or are "sane people" not suspicious of that, if the men dress in a manly way?

 

How about men who wear this???

 

It's the left defending public school grooming.

 

Despite arguing against his conclusion, you are accepting Condor's fallacious foundational supposition, that pedophiles are any more plentiful among the "Left wing," than among the Right wing. I doubt there is a whit of evidence, to support that propaganda (certainly none has been offered, by the Right wing slanderers). If anything, I would guess there are probably more, repressed, Right wing pedophiles, proportionately, than there are, Lefty pedos.

 

Nope.

 

I don’t know which side has more and honestly couldn’t care less.

 

1) Your characterization of "grooming," is a highly subjective, speculative, debatable, and frankly, dubious one, which you use in such a loose manner.

2) Your charge that it is "the left" which is "defending public school grooming," is, hence, undefined nonsense. I might as well claim that it is the Right which defends gun violence. Actually, that would be way more on the mark, than your own assertion. I'll try to think of a better analogy, for a later post.*

3) This thread has nothing especially to do, with public schools. The two cited events, were private ones.


*So, I could say, the Right stands for, and supports, baseless demonization of its political opponents, through hate-speech.