Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Reinstate the Lincoln Greenbacks

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by John Tyler, May 19, 2011.

Page 3 of 3
  1. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    amen to that.thats a no brainer.anybody who thinks otherwise is a fool.
     
    9/11 was an inside job, Jun 8, 2012
    #51
  2. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Jack got him a first class education and taken to school. That was the major reason both him and kennedy were killed by the establishment.Not going along with the staus quo.

    Heres some great stuff on it that everybody here should read.

    http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/0...dents-murdered-by-rothschild-lincoln-kennedy/

    did you read those speechs both kennedy and Lincoln gave about the dangers of the federal reserve?


    Article taken from "The National Educator", September 1990, P. 9



    By JOHN E. KOVACS, Editor, "The U. S. Patriot News"

    "Most Americans, even the college educated, know next to nothing about our monetary system. They would be surprized to know that the U. S. Treasury makes 22 1/2 cents on each quarter it mints, as it only costs 2 1/2 cents to mint this coin. Similar profits are realized on every other coin (with the possible exception of the penny) simply because the U. S., when minting coins, is simply following its Constitutional responsibility--the government alone has the right to print or mint our money. This right cannot be delegated any more than the right to declare war or collect taxes.

    If this is how the Constitution was intended to operate, why then do we allow a private group of foreign bankers to issue our currency (which they create out of thin air) and then "loan" it to the U. S. at perpetual interest, an interest that cannot be extinguished? Two of our Presidents asked that same question and look what happened to them. President Lincoln dared to have the U. S. issue its own greenbacks, backed with the full faith of the government, and bypassed the central bankers, avoiding any interest payments to them. For this patriotic act he was killed by John Wilkes Booth, a Rothschilds agent and contract killer, who was later spirited away to England where he lived out his life comfortably on a pension provided by the Rothschilds bankers. The greenbacks were immediately stopped and called in and redeemed at a ridiculous low price set by the central bankers. One point should be made here: The Rothschild bank financed the North and the Paris branch of the same bank financed the South, which is the real reason the Civil War was ignited and allowed to follow its long, and bloody course. The more Americans that dies, the more money the Rothschild bankers made.

    In our times this control of the issuance of our currency is in the illegal hands of the Federal Reserve, called the Fed, and the principal owner of the Fed's "Class A" stock is--you guessed it--the Rothschild family. The other president brave enough to oppose the banker barons, whose worth was now in the trillions, was President John F. Kennedy. This first Catholic president of our country enjoyed a deep-roots popularity--a charisma not enjoyed by most presidents. The Kennedy administration was so confident that it had the support of most voters that it ignored the Jewish lobby as the Kennedy brothers (John and Robert, his Attorney General) knew it was unnecessary to have the complete backing of every Jew in the U. S.

    President Kennedy pledged himself to what was the best for America and cared not how the greedy bankers of the Fed felt. JFK, like Lincoln in the 1860's. dared to have the U. S. Treasury issue U. S. Dollars, not Federal Reserve notes, and placed them into circulation without paying interest to any bankers, just as spelled out in the U. S. Constitution.

    This alarmed the owners of the Fed like a fifty point tremor on the Richter Scale. This must cease at once. The Fed bankers found themselves facing an intolerable situation, one which defied them and at the same time, one which they could not publicly complain without letting the cat out of the bag. Any complaint by the Fed would put it in a very bad light. The public would soon be aware of the gigantic scam the Fed has gotten away with since 1913. This scam allowed the Fed to avoid all income taxes and even audits.

    Their response was evident at Dealy Plaza in Dallas."
     
    9/11 was an inside job, Jun 8, 2012
    #52
  3. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    9/11 was an inside job, Jun 8, 2012
    #53
  4. Big Dog

    Big Dog New Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A bill put forward by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) would do what libertarians and conservatives have long wished for: effectively end the Federal Reserve.

    The National Emergency Employment Defense (NEED) Act of 2011 would place the Federal Reserve, a private, qusai-governmental institution that controls the nation’s monetary policy, under control of the U.S. Treasury. It would also implement new rules for the financial industry, in hopes of ending the worst abuses that created the 2008 financial collapse and the ensuing recession.

    Listening to Kucinich speak about the Fed, one gets the sense that he’s moved even closer to the position typically championed by his polar opposite in the House, arch-conservative Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX), currently a candidate for the Republican nomination to the presidency.

    Paul and Kucinich have both long agreed that something must be done about the Fed, formed by an act of Congress in 1913 as a way of stabilizing the banking industry. Both men have vocally supported audits of the Fed’s accounts, but Kucinich has not gone as far as Paul in most of his advocacy. Until now.

    “Ten million homes are in jeopardy,” he explained in a recent plea for support published to YouTube. “Fourteen million people out of work. Fifty million without health care. Endless wars. The Fed creates money out of nothing, gives it to banks, banks keep it on deposit, gain interest, pay high bonuses — fat city — while the rest of America falls apart. The Fed creates money out of nothing for the banks. Meanwhile, the rest of us have to be stuck in a debt-based economic system? I don’t think so.”

    “Now do you understand ‘Occupy Wall Street’?” he asked.

    Along those very lines, The NEED Act calls for “creation of money by private financial institutions as interest-bearing debts” to “cease once and for all.” It would also block commercial banks from betting depositors’ funds on risky investments like credit default swaps and derivatives, essentially restoring the wall of separation between commercial and investment banking that was toppled by repealing the Glass-Stegall Act.

    “Reclaiming the power of the Federal Government to create money, and to spend or lend money into circulation as needed, eliminates the need to treat money as a Federal liability or to pay interest charges on the Nation’s money supply to financial institutions,” the bill’s text reads. “[It] also renders unnecessary the undue influence of private financial institutions over public policy.”

    “This is the fundamental issue of our times: Who creates money, who gets it, and to what end,” Kucinich said. “The wealth of this nation is being accelerated to the top with the help of the Fed.”

    Source: Raw Story (http://s.tt/1de3w)
     
    Big Dog, Jun 10, 2012
    #54
Page 3 of 3

Share This Page