The Republican prezzy candidates rabbit on about being tough on Iran, supporting Israel, ad nauseam. But apparently their constituency does not agree with them.
A parasite can't live without a host, and the warmongering Jewish Neocons have found the perfect host in the ever-gullible Republican party. If you ever wonder how powerful this parasitic lobby is within the Republican party, just note how all Republican candidates with the exception of the "anti-Semitic" Ron Paul hold identical policy stances on Iran. .
Relax...this is not going to happen. Economic sanctions are starting to work and everyone knows that. You are simply attempting to spark a debate that is rapidly becoming a non issue. No one wants another expensive war that will have no apparent outcome.
Okay, I'll let them know while I'm reminding the liberal base that Hitler just like the Iranian leader once said he would annihilate the Jewish people with the 'Final Solution'. No one took Hitler seriously. Could history be repeating itself here? Not if we listen to the GOP.
Libya? Sleep through it? Afghanistan? Are you sleeping through the surrender? Iraq? Forget the support of neocons like Senators Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy? Liberals are pitiful. Can someone tell the Democrats that. Use crayons. They might read it.
Obama knows that. He is unlikely to attack Iran in any circumstance. On the other hand, the GOP would cheerfully ignite a regional catastrophe.
Do you know the difference between "being tough" and "war"? Obviously not, or else you are simply baiting here.
I do indeed. "Being tough" is where you rattle your sabre. "War" is when you actually use it. The US currently favours rattling because it knows drawing its sabre is usually useless. History has told it that is so.
Politicians are forced to answer right away or else face the wrath of the media, then they twist it for a nice sound bite.
