The first two pages of Peter Ferraras article are a must read for anyone who is not up to snuff on theFakegate Fabrication. In this thread I want to elaborate on my oft-stated distrust of Mitt Romney. My comments follow this excerpt from page three: Romney's Pending Sellout on Global Warming By Peter Ferrara on 3.7.12 @ 6:08AM http://spectator.org/archives/2012/03/07/romneys-pending-sell-out-on-gl/ Establishment Republicans will vote for Romney because he is the best they have to offer. The MSM wants Romney. Democrats will accept Romney because they know he is Hussein Light & White. Those three negatives should be enough to turn every conservative American away from Romney. Keep in mind that the Tea party is a splinter party within the Republican party; so Tea Partiers are under no obligation to support the Republican partys agenda by voting for Romney. Never forget that it was Republicans and Democrats working together for decades who brought this country to where it is at today. Should Romney beat Hussein in November the only thing conservatives will get is media newspeak and bipartisanship. In addition to RomneyCare, Ferraras dire warning about Romney and the global warming fraud is a powerful incentive for conservatives to work their tails off in order to stop him from going to the convention with enough delegates to get the nomination. RomneyCare and the Affordable Care Act are domestic disasters. This is International: If you know the history of Fakegate, you know that Romney cannot be separated from the United Nations, and, by extension, his support for the EPA irrespective of what he might say now to convince conservatives he can be trusted: That is a straightforward endorsement of Hussein & Companys position on the EPA and the United Nations. When it comes to the global warming fraud itself: Finally, when President Romney sticks it to the American people the way Hussein is doing, Im not going to share the blame because I have no intention of voting for him. I know I told you so. is a small consolidation for being right about that guy, but thats where its at as the primary season moves along.
When you look at the demographic of who is voting In these GOP primaries. 98% white. Then you look at the front runner in Mitt Romney who is so very very liberal. Either three things are happenin. One republicans are in denial of Romneys record and stupid. Or two, the liberals have been right all along and this massive negative campaign against Obama is just racism. Or both.
To Taxcutter: It”s not a “one or the other” choice. Hussein is so bad just about anybody will beat him. Working class rank & file Democrats are not all that pleased with Hussein. My point: Conservatives do not have to settle for Romney. Besides, where’s the harm in denying him the nomination for now? If Romney is going to get it anyway he can still do it in an open convention. I prefer betting that a true conservative will pop up and give him a run for the money? One thing is certain. Conservatives, indeed, all average working Americans will get nothing from Romney if he locks up the nomination before the convention. An open convention at least offers the possibility of extracting some true conservative positions from Romney. To date, his only claim to conservatism is his word. The word of a Northeast liberal —— and a quarter —— will get you a stick of bubble gum. To marbro: So what? Non-whites gravitate to the Democrat party because racism is their bread & butter. It’s certainly true that over 90 percent of black Americans vote for the Democrat in election after election, yet nobody accuses them of being racist. And let’s not forget that Hussein introduced racism in 2008 in the nomination fight against Hillary Clinton —— Democrat against Democrat. Bottom line: Always play the race card when the other guy is white. Daniel Greenfield nails it: On WLIB, It’s 1984 on the Dial Daniel Greenfield Wednesday, March 7, 2012 http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45080
Blacks are racist, hell I never said they werent. I said, the GOP went out of their way to push away the minority vote. Hispanics have traditionally been republican. But how can you vote republican when all hispanics are being all grouped with illegal mexicans? and the rhetoric has been bad, some calling for genocide. Didnt have to be that way.. stupidity ruled the day here.
I cant figure out why this is news: Mitt Romneys Etch-A-Sketch problem By Jackie Kucinich March 21, 2012 11:50PM http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/11454788-505/mitt-romneys-etch-a-sketch-problem.html Of course Romney says what he has to say. Hasnt he been saying whatever it takes to convince conservatives he is trustworthy? What he says if he gets the nomination; ultimately defeating Hussein in November, is not important. Romney prefers Democrats over conservatives because he and Democrats can play the compromise, bipartisanship, game. Thats why Democrats prefer Romney if they cant have Hussein. Once elected, theres not a snowballs chance Romney will govern from the Right. He, and the media, will swear he is governing from the center. Every time you hear that crap from a Democrat you know the center is about to move Left permanently. I dont see how Romney can change that fundamental truth even if he wanted to. Romney is a Northeast liberal, from Massachusetts no less, so the only way he can govern from the center is to throw conservatives under the bus. Incidentally, since the OP covers Romneys position on global warming have you noticed that Hussein does not talk about global warming while he does everything the environmental fraud calls for. Should Romney replace Hussein he wont talk about global warming either, but he sure as hell will continue Husseins policies.
Most hispanics in todays america are descended from or are still illegal aliens and they want to bring hugo chavez style social democracy to america. That's not stupidity it is truth