Ruh Roh: Andrew Breitbart Claims to Have Video From Obama's Radical College Days

modern liberalism is an arguement that doesent fit logic and reason. It is truly the reversal of Classical Liberalism.

 

All one need know as a Motto ...

Democrats LIE !
Republicans Talk Turkey

 

Have to spread it around, but +1.

 

You'd think that after doing a faceplant into a cow patty so many times, the conservatives would learn to not to rely on Breitbart.

Oh well. We liberals never get tired of that show. The pasture is over there, conservatives.

To be fair, it wasn't Breitbart pushing the story of the Michelle Obama whitey video. However, it was the conservative Breitbart lackeys who fell so hard for the scam. A lot of them are still convinced that there is a whitey video. And now we get to watch them do it all over again.

And speaking of popcorn, we've got the libel case against Breitbart to watch. He'd better settle, being it's such an open and shut case. He lied about Sherrod, he knew he was lying, she was not a public figure, and it caused her damage.

 

I see a lot of copy threads here.

 

Do all of you conservatives approve of Breitbart's lying about Shirley Sherrod? How do you justify it? By your usual "The ends always justify the means for my side!" excuse?

Can we get even one conservative to condemn Breitbart's big lie there, or does the conservative PC code prohibit such simple decency?

 

Nice of you to come out swinging in a thread through a non related topic but the second video of Sherrod was worse than the first. No doubt you failed to watch it and are just regurgitating what you read in blogs and see in the news. You want to attack Breitbart on this then fine. But I suppose your real villain THAT'S IF YOU TRULY CARE ABOUT SHERROD is the politicially minded Obama Administration who personally ordered her firing to get ahead of the press. Don't you owe me a reply in the obamacare poll?

 

It's a thread about Breitbart and his reputation, so his past behavior is a valid point of discussion.

And nobody ever owes anyone a response. I don't demand responses from anyone, and I feel no obligation to give them. If everyone had to counterrespond to every post, every thread would go on to infinity. If what I made sense or didn't make sense in the first place, repeating a variation of it again won't change that.

 

Oh I do. Unlike you I spend a lot of time in the forum wondering where all the leftys are running off to when presented with empirical fact. You see, I enjoy replies such as yours above. Watching leftists squirm in a fit of a false sense of self ritcheousness brings pleasure to my day. There is nothing better than presenting them with one topic and watching them write the first thing that comes in to their hate filled minds. Therefore I will post the thread for you. http://www.politicalforum.com/opini...e-preview-arguements-come.html#post1060844279

Oh, and aside from already replying to you on Sherrod, which you passed over nicely, Sherrod affects his credibility how? Every video britebart calmed to have has made its way to the media much to the anger of leftists who would rather play the broken record of "Obama is awesome" even though it was he who ensured Sherrods demise.

 

What kind of odds can I get that Breitbart never actually shows the video that he claims to have?

 

Neither did Obama hang out with Bill Ayers in college.

 

Obama didn't hang out with Bill Ayers in college. He graduated from Harvard in 1991 and met Ayers for the first time in 1995.

 

Most people laugh when they read such unadulterated crap. lmfao!

 

This is all inconsequential...us liberals have taken the right wing approach, and forgiven him. It's all good....and his past sins are in the past. Bush is out of office and we had to move on, Gingrich's multiple affairs are old news and he's been forgiven, and Obama's hate speech days are his past, and he's been forgiven. What's the big deal?

 

Link, please.

 

Actually, it's more like my Abnormal Psychology class. I keep my DSM-III manual close at hand for the more interesting cases.

 

Do you know if Obama ever served his obligatory stint as a Fox News Analyst after the Public Forgiveness Ceremony as all the disgraced Conservatives are required to do?

 

I'm not sure but, I think you must have to be White for Fox watchers to forgive you. Something about "their whites are better" or something. The Fox ceremony? No...their forgiveness is automatic with right wingers. It only applies to "other people".

 

Produce the Brietbart video, then talk. Even then, I'm sure we could dig into the college days of virtually any politician and find some 'different' person to criticize or marvel at.

I don't need to know that much, to realize that the Right is purely critical against Barack Obama. Generally, I've seen the hatred, bigotry and racism of the Right... and they are an example of what NOT to exude politically as an American citizen.

 

There are reasons to NOT trust Breitbart; many entrenched on the Right, don't tend to consider that.

 

You don't see your own "pattern"? If you don't... let me give you a clue, it is ALL over this forum.

The Right wing extremists are concerned primarily with themselves and imagine that others have nothing worthwhile to offer America; while tending to ignore the faults/hypocrisy of their own to an infuriating degree.

 

They won't learn... because they respond to interesting, anti-Liberal LIES in a manner akin to a drug dealer attaining his/her fix.

I've seen Breitbart get beat-down many times; yet, many still trust him.

I wish those who in Washington oppose Obama would relate their specific solutions for America, rather than find invent clever, phoney and hypocritical ways to criticize the President.

 

It amazes me that so many Conservatives don't realize all this lying in the present day, will only serve to marginalize them in MANY coming elections, not just the Presidential Elections of 2012.

 

Correct. It is as if people have forgotten that Breitbart and others like him have been seriously discredited before.

 

Ha-Ha!! I hope we Liberal/Progressives do not take on too much of the Right's character; it lead to little that is good for America.