"Run, Hide, Tell" not the way to win.

https://secure.marketwatch.com/stor...ers-amid-saturday-evenings-attacks-2017-06-04

Among other bad advice, London Mayor Kahn told his terrified residents, at least those who weren't Muslims, to "not be alarmed" with all the police and terror around them. What a difference there was during World Wars I and II, when real leaders, and real men gave hope, courage and a fighting spirit to defeat the enemy. Leaders like this in the West are sorely needed:

"We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, ...We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight... in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender."

Winston Churchill

"In this business, you find the enemy, then go after and destroy him. Everything else is rubbish!"

Eddie Rickenbacker

 

Neither Churchill nor Rickenbacker were fighting insurgencies.

 

Neither one would have advised their nations be invaded by people hostile to their way of life.

 

The vast majority of Muslims aren't hostile to anyone.

 

the vast majority of terrorist are Muslims.

 

Source?

And also, so?

 

Now how many terrorists of late were brought into the country, or born in the country by "innocent and harmless" Muslim parents, only to radicalize and kill and kill and kill...?

San Bernardino, Boston, Orlando, Manchester, London. Any of these ring a bell?

 

Reality

Islam is a death cult. The first time "Allah" sent Genghis Khan to punish his followers. Then the Crusaders. This next time it will be even worse. History will repeat itself.

 

So are the vast majority of terrorists Southern Baptists, or Amish?

Do you see Muslim terrorists as "Freedom Fighters?"

 

How many non-Muslims are born into a country by "innocent and harmless" non-Muslim parents and then go on to kill?

Going to bet its a larger number.

 

Statistically in America, a terrorist is more likely to be Christian than a Muslim.

As for your second question it depends on where they are and how they fight. Insurgents in Iraq during our occupation who attacked the US military were most definitely freedom fighters and I say that as a soldier who served in Iraq. The ones who bombed mosques and tortured and murdered Iraqi civilians were not.

 

The Crusades predates Genghis Khan.

If your knowledge of history is that flimsy, why should anyone believe your statements based on such an ignorant understanding?

 

they were both close in time and both brought on by the islams. The Crusades were nothing compared to what Khan did.

 

Khan's comments are similar to what his fellow Muslims told the passengers on the hijacked planes on 9-11.

"Everything will be okay. Just stay quiet and you'll be ok. We are going back to the airport"

 

Over 80% of the country identifies as Christian, whereas ~1% is Muslim. Important context missing from your apologia for Islam.

And more people have been killed by Muslim terrorists since 9/11 than Christian terrorists.

 

Murdering the entire population of Jerusalem, including thousands of innocent Jews, it pretty much exactly the kinds of things Khan did.

But yeah I guess more than 200 years difference is "close in time".

 

You have a very weak understanding of statistics if you believe that to be the case.

 

Only because of the outlier that is 9/11.

 

Both wars they brought on themselves.

 

How did Muslims bring the Mongol invasion on themselves?

 

If a car is coming down the sidewalk, running seems like good advice to me.

 

And they sure don't tell on the hostile ones now do they .

 

Yup, Khan wanted China. He sent a caravan to the Shaw and he killed it. Then khan sent another one and he killed it too. Then khan turned from China to the middle east.

 

Brilliant!! What percent of American's are muslim? 2%?

 

What did the Shah of Persia have to do with the Caliph in Baghdad?