Rush compares Rape to filibuster rule change!

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...rape-analogy-to-decry-filibuster-rule-change/


Really once again we can see the leader of the Republican Party make a comment, that goes way to far. No wonder the Right will continue to lose woman voters. My only question is would this be classified as legit rape

 

Another day, another attempt at a smear by a statist on this forum.

Ho-hum.

 

OMIGSH!!! OMIGOSH!!! OMIGOSH!!!!

 

What Reid did was much worse than rape, treason and murder; ; according to BH Obama, Reid himself and Joe Bite-me. But that was before they became traitors.

 

Let me see if I have this right. The repubs have been using the filibuster to block bloody near anything they don't like, which translates out to mean anything the administration recommends. They have been acting like, well, what they are - a bunch of spoiled brats paired up with a bunch of ideological fanatics willing to destroy the government and the economy because they didn't win the election and get their own diseased little way. They, as usual, went too far and, in order to get ANYTHING accomplished, they got stamped on. In other words, they brought it on their unsanitary selves. Now, again as usual, they are sniveling and sobbing. If they had ever acted like responsible adults, they wouldn't be treated as they presently deserve.

It is possible for someone to hold them in greater contempt than I do (they've worked for it and certainly earned it) but most people probably will be unwilling to go to the great effort involved. They pollute everything they touch and they are proud of it. Having behaved like traitors, they now accuse anyone not equally guilty of treason.

 

The Sleazocrats were singing a different tune when THEY were trying to block nominees, weren't they:


[video=youtube;EkXjYohzAOY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EkXjYohzAOY[/video]




but the Republicans NEVER RESORTED TO THIS, did they?





YEah, Screw that "balance of power" crap,and that dammed "Constitution thing" where it came from.

 

Did Rush not denounce the Republican Party as irrelevant and decided to run his radio show as an independent with a particular distaste for the Democrats?

 

Rush is a complete moron his views are quite radical and extreme at times. However you must also keep in mind he is also an ENTERTAINER. Much like Howard Stern.

 

>>>MOD EDIT: INSULT<<< I listened to Rush today...and heard all this. Normal people listen normally. They get what's being said. And then there are the other people that don't listen...but wait for a "controversal" word to appear....like RAPE. And then they scream and faint, jump up and down and go all drama. They don't even care what was said. Very shallow.

 

You must not be old enough to remember the first months of the previous Republican presidents when this type of crap was pulled on every single appointment. So your self righteous indignation is unimpressive. Try learning a little recent history.

 

Well that is just silly. He was all for this when republicans wanted to do it in 04 05. Obamacare is better equated to rape. What a dolt.

 

first months ???? were 5 years in, see where the problem is...

 

Did Republicans " do it" in 04 or 05?

They COULD HAVE, but they didn't.

NO. Talking about it is one thing..actually CHANGING THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS, is another altogether.

 

Screw liberals.....they stand by and watch Palin get slammed by Bashir and now they want to slam Rush for analogy that's spot on.....you folks need help....call Cuba!

 

and Obama / Biden. I'd bet the farm Howard Stern could run Obamacare better than Obama. Anyone disagree with that?

 

Rush was always out of control. No one controls Rush. Republicans did not pay attention.

 

Rush has always been a moron, so what's really new here?

You know?

 

Screw Republicans they wanted Bashir fired but the run to defend a drug user.

 

What's the definition of a moron... let's see... a person with a mild mental retardation, right? Let's take several known Rush quotations, compare them with several known quotations by Obama and see, who deserves the title:

Rush:

"You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one."
"Bigot: A person who wins an argument with a liberal."

Obama:

"I've been to 57 States, with 3 more to go"
"Hawaii is in Asia"

No contest

 

"Obama had written in his first book, "Dreams From My Father" (1995), before entering politics, that he had used marijuana and cocaine ("maybe a little blow"). He said he had not tried heroin because he did not like the pusher who was trying to sell it to him."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/24/world/americas/24iht-dems.3272493.html?_r=0

He didnt use Heroin because he didnt like the dealer... This is the guy you defend daily and you call someone else a drug user? Really?

 

Another ridiculous analogy from a right wing nitwit, him and Palin ought to be a pair.

 

Rush was trading cigar boxes full of cash for cigar boxes full of oxycontin while at the same time was on the radio condemning drug use. He's a hypocritical piece of (*)(*)(*)(*) who wouldn't know integrity if it bit him in the ass.

 

So is the poster who mentioned him... Obama has been pushing the states on Pot laws meanwhile he was a pot head himself... Funny that part escaped you.... Its ok though we are all used to the blindly loyal people defending Obama to the death ~

 

Rush Limbaugh is not the leader of the republican party. He is a political entertainer. Are you so afraid of losing female votes that you have to create a strawman to torch? The right will not continue to lose female voters. Even with all their spending and favor ability among polled women in Virginia, the democrats just barely scrapped by.

 

Limbaugh goes back and forth between passing himself off as an entertainer ( which is what he actually is) and being an influential political figure (which he has also claimed to be).

Which one he decides he is, depends on how many people he's offended with his latest slur, and who they are.