[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBf0I-rB0m0&feature=player_embedded"]ÐаÑвление о ÑиÑÑаÑии вокÑÑг евÑопейÑкой ÐÐ Ð - YouTube[/ame] En español with comments in the same direction: Obama and his Goldman Sachs associaters working in favour of a end-game 3rd.World War. It is notg conspirancy theory, it is real and happening now: we have to denounce this in the streets and in every possible scenario. http://www.rafapal.com/?p=12710
Hot air as usual. What amuses me is that I am very distantly related to him. (half the the family left before the russian revolution happened, so the last name was slightly changed)
is no joke. They are asking USA and NATO countries, if we agree with a project that clearly is pointing its guns to a country which is not attacking us. For God's sake!! can't you see this is a real claim? Why are we making that dangerous offensive system against Russia now? Are they attacking us? Is it maybe because our elite has programmed to ener either in Syria or in Iran and they know Russia is going to feel attacked in two fronts... are they trying to tigger the 3rd WW or what?
As said already in other threads , don't overlook Sunday's elections . Many nonsense things will be said . And being Nationalistic and Patriotic is a Chapter one ruse for appealing to the ................ Russia can handle this situation any time and they have been play acting with it for several years already . It is a bargaining tool . The only things actually bothering Putin and Lavrov ( Dmitry is just the post man) are Syria and Iran . They think that they can obtain advantages by using old style blustering and veiled threats So , if you want to waste time and money sticking a missile system in Kalingrad, comrade Putrid -- get on with it and shut up !! , for example .
Then,m who is attacking who? they are answering a NATO policy of agression, man..... http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/ss-26.htm Is your president informing you of this,... is your press thelling you the implications of these movements of missiles and why on hell they are menacing Russia instead of stopiing those unjust and criminal wars on petrol and begining to make a plan with Russia and otrher nuclear countries for disarming the world. That is your nobel price inheritance.
I think Putin is a transgendered male. Apparently the surgical procedure worked. In English we call him Put In.
In my "love" -hate relationship I have used Putrid( favourite) , Vlad the Bad , Pushk In , Dwarf , Gang Master and Mafia Supremo . He returns all my mail , addressed to Ray . Sweet soul .
He is Medvedev, Wikipedia: Because of constitutionally mandated term limits, Putin was ineligible to run for a third consecutive presidential term. After the victory of his successor, Dmitry Medvedev, in the 2008 presidential elections, Putin was nominated by Medvedev to be Russia's Prime Minister; Putin took the post on 8 May 2008. In September 2011, Putin officially announced that he will seek a third non-consecutive term in the 2012 presidential elections.
Mendvedevs mouth is operated by putins hand. Putin will be the new Prime Minister of Russia, after the "election".
No, I must respectfully disagree. A new war in Europe will be a chance for restoration for the countries that got badly shafted by ww1 and ww2. The powers are playing on the move again, some countries will bet with Russia, some with Turkey, and some with the EU. It can be argued that EU interest is in opposition to the interest of some new member states.
Why? In the wors scenario possible: Because Russia, China, India and some others have also nukes.... they answer is programmed to be inmediate... you can reduce half of the world to ashes, but our 100% populated territory would be wiped out also. In case governments keep cold: NATO can fight locally in Iran or Syria. Then the intervention of Russia and/or China would be possible. That would continue bleeding Nato Army (our boys and girls , and technology).... There is a chance of doing something reasonable for a chance if people realize of this: WAR IS NOT GOOD FOR THEN WHATSOEVER. War is only good for our rulers, those Goldman&Sachs con men that would keep the population worried for internal and external security while they definitivelly wipe out democracy, freedom and rights of their own population. The video of the President of Russia shows they are not expanding nor menacing with atomic shield,... they are been menaced for the criminal rulers of USA-UE with the dumb aquiescience of their population who still believe wverything they do is the best for us. Peace is possible, but only if people of USA_EU wake up and stand for their legitimacy as a democratic country, and chucks out those war criminals.
I agree that war would be bad for people, but ONLY IF you count only the people who are not oppressed. Since European democracies don't have such safeguards and checks and balances as the USA has, democracy is NOT a good thing in Europe, democracy is a part of the problem. Look at it on the bright side. Most of Europe's 19th and 20th century problems are because of overpopulation. And these problems are not going away in the 21st century either. A ww3 that wipes out more than 50 % of European people would certainly solve Europe's problems. A ww3 would also reset the cycle of European history, like the collapse of Rome and the medieval plagues did. This is all good news to people of countries that ww1 and ww2 destroyed.
Russia denouncing an alliance originally created for the sole purpose of **** blocking them in the even of an expansion? Say it aint so...
I agree, but wouldn't it be so interesting to see how another replay of ww1-2 would play out in Europe?
Don't speak Russian, but I believe we are heading toward another world war if they call it that. We always go to war when the economy is in the crapper.
