Safe and effective, hey?

‘Waiting to drown’: Covid vaccine injury class action filed against the federal government
Australians who suffered life-altering injuries from Covid vaccines have accused the government and health authorities of a “cover-up”.

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/h...t/news-story/8f91ca843cc4b62b7df9cbabd398cfe6

Aren't you glad you played the game? As those mentioned in the article aren't.

 

As I stated on many occasions. You have to be a complete FOOL in order to swallow the G-20 and the World Homicide Organization FAKED "virus" and it's equally FAKED "pandemic" ------> Depopulation program!

 

To bring a ‘private’ law action against the government, a plaintiff requires
three things:
1 a cause of action (a legally recognised right against the government); 7
2 a court with jurisdiction (relevantly, authority to determine the subject matter
of the cause of action, and jurisdiction over the defendant); 8 and
3 a right to proceed. 9
The right to proceed is a law removing the government’s immunity from suit.
Under the English common law, government immunity from suit was both a
defence to the cause of action (‘the King can do no wrong’), and a bar to the
jurisdiction of courts (‘the King cannot be sued in his own courts’). 10 This
common law government immunity from suit will be applied in federal cases
pursuant to s 80 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) (‘Judiciary Act’), unless that
immunity is contrary to the Australian Constitution or to any applicable statutory
law conferring a right to proceed. 11
This article considers the source of the right to proceed against the Common-
wealth and the states in cases in federal jurisdiction — in particular, whether this
right is derived by implication from the Australian Constitution or from Com-
monwealth legislation enacted under s 78 of the Constitution.12

https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/1707919/30_3_3.pdf

 

Unfortunately, there are plenty around.

 

Lol, people actually think this suit will be successful? That's hilarious.

 

Yeah, LOL!

1 a cause of action (a legally recognised right against the government); 7
2 a court with jurisdiction (relevantly, authority to determine the subject matter
of the cause of action, and jurisdiction over the defendant); 8 and
3 a right to proceed. 9
The right to proceed is a law removing the government’s immunity from suit.

Funny you should say that because everyone that took that pseudoscience junk thought the same thing about it being safe and effective, that's what's hilarious.

 

Want to make a friendly wager? If this succeeds, I'll donate to the charity of your choice. If it doesn't, you donate to the charity of my choice. Deal?

 

Not wasting my time with your false promises. I'll be just as satisfied that you drop your dacks and do the walk of shame.

 

Glad to see you realize that this won't succeed.

 

How do you figure that I "realise that it won't succeed" when I called your bluff of FALSE PROMISES, meaning you won't cough up?

 

Ah, so you are relying on false accusations . . . just like the anti-vaxxers you are defending. All you are telling me right now is that you would back out if you lost this bet. I won't do the same. I'll happily post the receipt from my donation if you win the wager.

 

So you'll post an old receipt hey? Not accusations, more like intuition that it will never happen. Only someone who has a dodgy reputation would make the statement of "accusations". So what has the anti-vax part got to do with the price of eggs? Did you run out of ammo for your argument so you have to go down the personal path? Typical.

 

So you think I have the ability to travel back in time and produce a receipt for a donation to a charity that YOU chose? Weird. I have no such supper powers. But of course you have no actual confidence in your claims. Typical.

 

No, making false ones. Interesting that you use the same words I use, TYPICAL.

 

Don't count your chickens before they hatch on this "global run genocide" ever getting before a "legitimate" non-CORRUPT court system that is not "controlled" by the same psychotic entities who just brought you a global depopulation PSYOPS. Remember these are the same genocide loving institutions that just ALLOWED all their brainwashed denizens to go around with useless submission masks, standing 6' a part and then injecting themselves with their "SHAM" miracle pseudo-vaccines that cause intenional death and all sorts of other illnesses with their blessings.


These are their same "CORRUPT" court systems on the global level with their hand-picked selected STOOGES; and their hand-picked selected politicians, who would sell their own mothers soul to the devil if ordered too!

 

They can only try.

 

We're going to see what's informed consent in Australia, I suppose.

 

Yes, we are. Not to forget to mention the rest of the Nuremberg Code that was egregiously ignored.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

 

I see. Only fools believe SARS-CoV-2 is a virus.

 

We've been through this... how many times before now? No one has any record of the existence of SARS-CoV-2. What has been posted in the past, is only a half-baked study. Also, that proves that the virus was never isolated, purified and a host reinfected. Anyone who believes that this has occurred, well...

 

That's not gonna go anywhere. There one, count them, one real plaintiff. The rest are all "no definitive link".

It's sad for the guy that he had a bad reaction, but he's one in millions of folks who didn't, and here in the states at it's peak your chance of dying from covid was something like 1 in 600.

 

You did miss reading the following in the article, didn't you?

This will only increase over time.

 

I read it. Doesn't change my comment.

 

Come out into the sunlight and look at all the deaths & injuries that have occurred from the pseudoscience injections.

 

Yeah, sure--SARS-CoV-2 is a hoax.