Read the official publications for yourself, especially the recently declassified 28 pages. Whether you agree the document(s) strongly suggest Saudi involvement or not is your personal belief system and not my concern, many however do agree (see thread title).
In your opinion Bob, not according to longknife. Do you have a reading comprehension issue? Read the post below. Show me where the OP is questioning the Saudi's involvement. Sorry, but you are disagreeing. longknife made a statement in the subject that the "Saudi Officials Supported 9/11 Terrorists" and then posted his feelings why. To longknife, there is no question and you disagree with him because you think it's unverified. I can't believe I have to explain this stuff to you.
Sorry it's an unverified claim no matter what longknife believes. I don't "think" it's unverified, I know it is. I can believe you're trying to be a contrarian because we disagree vehemently on the OCT. I don't need your "explanations", they are useless to me and more importantly, dishonest and intellectually insulting.
so now it's "Saudi involvement" but not "Saudi royal family" involvement ... moving the goalposts again Bob? ... I think we all know that Saudi involvement was there ...
Great nitpicking catch Shiner, I meant Saudi royal family or government (which is the same thing). I didn't say NOT Saudi royal family did I? You added that phoniness. The Saudi royal family are Saudis, right? Does that help your hobby for today?
don't need all the links again Scott ... you stated that the flash and mysterious pods at impact are proof that their were no hijackers ... but thanks for all the copy/pasta ...
I'd better link to this info so that nobody is confused. http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/what-truthers-believe.532027/page-31#post-1069864990
I better link to your quote so that nobody is confused. Pay particular attention to the part of the quote I put in red.
5 hours of bullshit - no proof of anything. The plane wasn't on autopilot. The hijackers had flight training. Ample evidence for this. The Twin Towers are a unique design. The technician showed he had no knowledge of how the twin towers were built. Architects have no expertise in engineering structures. Architects are glorified artists. You need a structural engineer. Yes buildings fall down - not sideways like the movies. Here are some examples - even the side to side motion of the earthquake caused the building to fall down just like a "controlled demolition". Dead link but I think I remember what that nonsense was about. Generals and their staffs have to justify their pay by constantly planning for everything. Sometimes they just don't have enough to plan for so they start planning for silly extreme stuff. I'm sure there are plans for an alien invasion somewhere - that doesn't prove that aliens exist. Why make up motives when you actually have one. Osama Bin Laden's Letter to America: Transcript in Full - Newsweek Or rather a really long letter filled with them. First link dead. Second link - no evidence. But yes, the citizens of the U.S. lost a significant amount of freedom after 9/11 and our balanced budget disappeared. Is there any evidence that anyone other than 19 hijackers crashed 4 airplanes - no. Any evidence that someone other than Osama Bin Laden and Al-Quaeda was involved? No. Might those in the government have turned the other way and let this happen? Maybe. Any evidence for this? No. Were the Israelis happy it happened? Except for the "dancing Israelis" I haven't evidence for this. Were the Israelis involved? Maybe. Any evidence for this? No. That's the thing. Whenever a 9/11 truther talks about something else, the side they are talking for loses credibility. One might even call them Maybe it's best to put 9/11 on the backburner.
If there is even a shred of evidence in that 5 hours of bullshit, you're welcome to present it. But since you have no rebuttal, I'll assume you've admitted to losing the argument.
Linking to a bullshit video for over 100 times, no commentary / analysis. No direct reference, which offers one scrap of evidence. The spammed video is not impressive and genuine thinking people see it for what it is. 25 years of batshit is very unimpressive.
I have to run Bob, but this post of yours is basically defending a narrative that is contradicted by all known facts, all laws of physics including aeronautical laws. More later sir.
Nope. Known facts explain the narrative. Conspiracy-related "facts" explain jack. All of them? Is this a joke? Anybody who genuinely understands physics knows fully well that none of them are contradicted. Well you said "all of them". It's once again the same horseshit claims, bare assertion or reliance on inept sources!
