It was Trumps event, and he paid the guy to speech along side him, and you do not know what Trump has to do with it? I can't help you with that. lol
No you did not. I quoted your post IN FULL. You just said: "you need to lower yourself and think you can score some point over the grave of such a hero."
That is already covered in our related conversation thread. So, from what you know, is MLK's anti-racism identical to DiAngelo's and Kendi's? Surprise me and don't deflect this time!
But you've already said that your standard only includes "trail by combat." That leaves out "fight like hell!"
They like to be around people they feel they can relate to. Peace thrives on empathy, seeing themselves in others. Race is an obvious physical way they differ, but ultimately a superficial one. If people are encouraged to see that skin colour doesn't make people all that different, racism fades away quickly. If race is constantly pushed as making us fundamentally different and if we are constantly categorized by it, racism grows. Othering forms racism and many so-called "anti-racists" encourage othering.
I agree. But it isn't how things are. While race is superficial it invades every aspect of American life. Anti-racists are just people who engage in what we call reverse racism. Racism under a different name
Yes, they are, and we can recognize that across the political and ideological spectrum. More and more voices on the right have come to stand up and call out racism on the right, and more of us on the left need to call it out on the left as well. Some of us do. More need to.
WTF? The fighting on January 6 was physical, only because Giulliani said "trial by combat?" No, the fighting was physical because the fighting was physical! What he said was irrelevant!
Again, I explained it in my post. And your last post where you asked what I mean, is where you did not even quoted the entire sentence, let alone my full post.