Senile Is As Senile Does – And Joe Biden Is Senile

I agree, Biden could lose out at the convention.

 

He never has had a stuttering problem.

 

Bribed Joe is also a liar.

Biden's Outrageous Spin on His Special-Counsel Lies could set him up for impeachment.

'One of the key and scripted moments was Biden angrily denouncing Hur for raising his son’s death. Many in the media eagerly replayed the clip the next day, calling Hur’s question outrageous, callous and unprofessional. But NBC reports it was not Hur but Biden himself who raised Beau Biden’s death.'


Bribed Joe Lied when he claimed Hur questioned him on Beau's death.

And then Bribed Joe falsely slandered the Special Counsel on International Television.

'In the disastrous press conference, Biden went on the attack, asking, “How in the hell dare he raise that? Frankly, when I was asked the question, I thought to myself it wasn’t any of their damn business.”'

'NBC’s sources suggest this was a knowingly false claim by the president — he was the one who raised his son’s death.'

'this isn’t something the White House can simply fix with a few rewrites in brackets.'

'The corrected version would read: “How in the hell dare raise that? Frankly, when [I raised] the question, I thought to myself it wasn’t any of their damn business.”'

'And that wasn’t the president’s only false claim at the presser.'

'He alleged the special counsel did not find willful retention of material. Hur not only did so but repeatedly said so in the report. Biden claimed he did not show classified material to third parties. Not only did Hur find he did, there’s a witness to that fact.'

'Biden said he kept material in locked drawers or drawers capable of being locked. Hur showed pictures of ripped boxes holding such material in his garage. Once again, it’s hard to see how Biden made these false claims without his staff’s prior review.'

'The president famously works off teleprompters and scripts. His staff also did not correct the record on any of these false statements after the press conference, despite them being demonstrably untrue. Ironically, the White House may have to claim the president was simply confused in a press conference called to deny such chronic confusion. It already had to spin the president confusing the presidents of Egypt and Mexico in that presser.'

 

I'm willing to bet Biden could name more world leaders than most commenters here.

 

The facts are clear, the jury is in, most clear-thinking people can see Biden has diminished mental abilities. And he's getting worse by the day. By the time the convention rolls around the democrats in the back room will have a replacement ready to throw his/her hat in the ring. Could be someone we suspect or could be a dark (pun intended) horse.

 

Yes. He named Al Sisi as the president of Mexico.

He named dead leaders of France and Germany as current leaders. He can name Napoleon. Is that supposed to impress us?

 

again, i'm impressed he can name those world leaders and can likely name more leaders than everybody on these forums. and confusing mexico/egypt leader isn't bad considering they're both south of countries with current events. at least he knows who his running mate is, unlike Trump who thinks he's running against Obama.

 

I have to ask -- when someone makes excuses for Biden what are they thinking? Seems weird to me to cover for Biden.

 

What seems weird to me are those that cover and make excuses for someone found liable for sexual assault, defamation, and fraud while facing 4 indictments and 91 felonies.

 

What seems weird to me is someone bothering to jump into a thread for the express purpose of avoiding the predicate of that thread and instead putting forth yet another whataboutism.

If Trump court involvement is the topic you want to discuss, there are countless threads created for you to do so. Choosing one about Biden's senility is not a logical outlet for that discussion.

 

It's not whataboutism. It's hypocrisy. Both are running for president and you ignore the senility of the stable genius.

 

It is the very definition of whataboutism

what·a·bout·ism
[ˌ(h)wədəˈboudizəm]whataboutery.
the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue. Also called whataboutery.


What you did is the very definition of whataboutism. This is a thread about Biden's apparent senility. If your desire was to discuss Trump's legal cases, there are plenty of outlets for that on this board. Biden's senility is a different topic than Trump's legal cases. Biden's senility is not dependent or related to Trump's legal cases in any way. They are two entirely different topics. What about that do you find so difficult to grasp?

 

Trump's court cases was in reference to 'making excuses/defending' so I can drop that. I can keep it on 'senility' but ignoring 'senility' of his running mate IS hypocrisy. I'd put all my money down that Biden could name more world leaders than Trump. Any day of the week.

 

So you now understand that your post was unabashed whataboutism. This is solid progress.

My work here is done.

 

Aw, come on Eddie! The Beaver says it can be weird to cover for both Biden and Trump.

 

Wrong. You now understand your post was unabashed hypocrisy as you refused to deny that Biden is way more mentally competent than Trump.

My work is done.

 

Unabashed hypocrisy? How so?

You changed the subject and I correctly pointed out that you doing so is whataboutism. There is NOTHING hypocritical in doing so. I made an accusation, you questioned it, and in response I gave a detailed explanation that is unassailable.

You keep making an accusation, and instead of giving a legitimate explanation of that accusation, you instead opt to reply with ANOTHER whataboutism. Biden's senility is not impacted one way or the other by Trumps mental competency.




Even stepping away from the whataboutism concept for just a moment, and we instead decide to play the game you are trying to play... For starters, we have no way of knowing whether Biden can or cannot name more world leaders than Trump. We literally have no way of knowing this. Even if for sake of argument we stipulate that he can, this still would prove exactly nothing.

It would be like looking at someone's Grandpa with mild to moderate dementia that used to be a Chemistry teacher. It is very likely that this person could name the atomic weight of far more elements than his mentally competent grandson who is an accountant. This reality would in no way mean that the demented Grandpa therefore is more mentally competent than his accountant grandson, it only means that having dealt with the elements his entire life, the demented Grandpa is going to remember far more about atomic weights than the acccountant grandson ever knew. This would not mean that you should therefore trust the demented Grandpa more than the grandson to make decisions as to whether it is wise to utilize diplomacy or go to war in an international conflict, rather it would ONLY mean that the demented Grandpa is better at telling you the atomic weight of various elements.

If you think the job of being President is defined by one's ability to recall the names of world leaders, you do NOT understand the role of the Preseident.

 

ANYONE with a family member who’s been through senility and Alzheimer’s KNOWS Biden is partly there. It’s so damn obvious. Every tell tale sign. Clear as day.

Denial is ignoring reality. They’re doing to him what they did to RBG…keeping people in power well past their expiration date.

 

you changed the subject first by asking how anybody can defend Biden. Then you claim 'whataboutism' in a weak attempt to defend hypocrisy.

 

Interesting take. Im not sure that asking how anyone could defend Biden would be changing the topic if that WERE said. But first things first...

Please cut and paste what I have said that makes you think I asked how anyone could defend Biden.

It seems to me that you are hopelessly confused. It will be interesting to see how you reply to this one.

 

oops, i'm new user still getting used to forums/board. looks like someone else asked about defending Biden and you jumped in screaming 'whataboutism'

 

In terms of abject incompetence and fecklessness, I can see the comparison to James Buchanan, but as far as Cruciferous Vegetable Joe's mental incompetence goes, he's more like post-stroke Woodrow Wilson.