I have. You ran from it pretending that since the 9/11 commission didn't have every concievable piece of evidence that whatever evidence they had was irrelevant. This claim makes you completely irrelevant as you have now proven yourself to be irrational and unwilling to look at the evidence. Me reposting or in this case re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-reposting the evidence isn't going to change that. And thank you for once again proving the complete relevancy of what I just posted.
Sure I can. And I have. And you ran like a little girl from the evidence. All you can do is pretend. Do you deny I linked the 9/11 commission report to you? Do you deny the 9/11 commission report has information linking all 19 hijackers to Al Qaeda? Now run along. We know you're too afraid to answer the questions and expose your posts as the lies and fraudulant BS it is.
Why do you refuse to prove they were all in al qaeda? Is it because you can't do anything but make claims you don't have the balls to support? So show us how they were all in al qaeda or stop making false claims.
Sure I can. And I have. And you continue to run like a little girl from the evidence. All you can do is pretend. Do you deny I linked the 9/11 commission report to you? Do you deny the 9/11 commission report has information linking all 19 hijackers to Al Qaeda? Now run along. We know you're too afraid to answer the questions and expose your posts as the lies and fraudulant BS it is. All too easy when truthers are as "good" as you. BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
You still can't prove they were all in al qaeda. Pathetic. But, you are a great friend to Truthers for exercising your false claims on a regular basis.
Serious question for you. Do you honestly think anyone is fooled by your antics? Here you go yet again. All the evidence one needs to link the 19 hijackers to Al Qaeda. You've been given it before. You've run away from the truth time and time again. More running only proves you know the truth of 9/11 and are not man enough to admit the truth.
You still need to prove they were all in al qaeda. Simply linking the Report is lazy and dishonest. But that is all your posts know......
The link contains all the evidence. The fact you deny all the evidence in order to push your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) agenda is not my problem.
No, that is a truther tactic like what suede use to pull before he got banned. The 9/11 commission report is very specific and has all the evidence any honest person would need. The FACT you lie over and over again that I have not provided you with evidence only shows you know exactly what the 9/11 commission report contains and you know for a FACT it exposes all your silly arguments for the trite crap it is.
If you won't accept the evidence in the 9/11 commission report, what evidence WOULD you accept? You are obviously and blindly dismissing evidence as truthers always do, but demanding evidence over and over and over and over again while rejecting what you've been given leads one to wonder what evidence you WOULD accept. Would you accept the word of Osama bin Laden or other leaders of Al Qaeda? They've all claimed the 19 hijackers were Al Qaeda brothers. Do you have evidence they are lying?
How can I present you with evidence when you run like a scared little school girl when presented with a question? I asked you straight up what evidence you would accept since you refuse to accept the evidence in the 9/11 commission report. Your failure to answer only shows once more that you're only a truther troll out to prove just how ignorant truthers really can be when they put their.... well, not minds..... other body parts into it.
Are you ever going to prove they were in al qaeda? I'm not even reading your posts unless I see cited evidence.
Cited evidence you've been avoiding for quite some time and which you can't refute. Now, your claims that since it doesn't contain every shred of evidence and therefore is invalid just doesn't cut it. Eventually you will either have to face the truth or you will probably end up being banned due to spamming.
