Should Members of Congress be Forced to Wear Body Cams ?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by Llewellyn Moss, Jan 21, 2018.

?

Should Members of Congress be Forced to Wear Body Cams ?

Poll closed Jan 28, 2018.
  1. Yes.

    2 vote(s)
    28.6%
  2. No.

    3 vote(s)
    42.9%
  3. I don't know.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. I don't care.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Are you a bodycam salesman ?

    2 vote(s)
    28.6%
  6. John McCain with a body cam ? Ugh. No thank you.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Llewellyn Moss

    Llewellyn Moss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In order to foster transparency in the federal government, I propose that all congress and senate members be required to wear body cams. These will be worn when conducting both official and "unofficial" government business, in order to record their actions for public review.
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2018
    Jonsa and Merwen like this.
  2. Merwen

    Merwen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    11,574
    Likes Received:
    1,731
    Trophy Points:
    113



    Absolutely.
     
  3. Dispondent

    Dispondent Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    34,260
    Likes Received:
    8,086
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its all fun and games until the Russians hack it. No thanks...
     
  4. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No thanks, i dont want to see chuck and warren doing it with her headress on.
     
  5. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Brilliant and creative "solution". I can't stop chuckling at the imagery.
     
    Merwen likes this.
  6. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,111
    Likes Received:
    74,419
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Why not the lresident as.........sorry worked it out just threw up into my mouth at the thought of what I might see But then to see that it would have to have a magnified attached :p
     
  7. Llewellyn Moss

    Llewellyn Moss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Haha...

    The 'small hands' thing, eh ?
     
  8. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,111
    Likes Received:
    74,419
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    If you like.....:p
     
  9. Canell

    Canell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    4,308
    Likes Received:
    1,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I thought the CIA is listening to everybody and doesn't need body cams. :bored:
     
    JakeJ likes this.
  10. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,844
    Likes Received:
    27,366
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Maybe if there is an exception for when they're working with classified information. Got to be careful about that. But then, we already have cameras rolling in the chambers. We can tune in to C-SPAN and keep an eye on them. Most people just don't bother. It's nowhere near as much fun as watching Mark Dice on YouTube :D
     
    Llewellyn Moss likes this.
  11. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,235
    Likes Received:
    63,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would love it, and the President and his admin, including the DOJ

    and make their calls avail to public under freedom of information act...

    sure they could mark some classified, but have those reviewed by two other departments, members of all parties have to be members of both groups
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2018
  12. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Many years ago I was a packinghouse union steward. This included then meeting with management over issues and grievances, often involving negotiating and making deals, plus candidly talking about both management and union employees - not always complimentary by any side.

    A few members would bitterly complain these negotiations should be public for which any member who wanted to watch and listen could attend. However, were that done exactly nothing ever would be accomplished and negotiations impossible.

    This is a really dumb idea. It would be impossible for any member of Congress to negotiate or truthfully discuss nearly anything - knowing that any 6 seconds of less-than-perfect word choices could destroy them. Instead, each would just say carefully worded short talking points prepared by political consultants.

    The OPer should wear a body cam with visual and audio recording that is automatically put online and preserved online for anyone to see except when in his own house. That way we all can example every single word he says and what he is doing or not doing every second he's not a home. I suppose, all employers could require this too.

    Bad idea. The only thing we really need to know about any politicians is what they do in terms of voting on legislation as that is all that matters.
     

Share This Page