Should the government make interracial relationships/relations illegal

You claimed that genocide required killing, but according to the UN, 4 of the 5 scenarios they cite do not require killing at all. Are we to believe the UN is less credible than rahl of the internet?

 

claiming this is genocide is still ****ing hilarious.

You are trying to deflect from that, but I won't let you

 

What's hilarious is you can't defend your own argument. Weak bro.

 

huh, my argument is it's ****ing hilarious watching you claim this is genocide, when it is not. And having that pointed out to you for 39 pages.

 

You made a claim that genocide requires killing, but you can't explain why 4 of the 5 scenarios listed by the UN do not require killing in order to be considered genocide. It's almost like your argument is wrong, or something.

 

if the preservation of "whiteness" is your goal, go create your own little white racist paradise somewhere.

 

it's ****ing hilarious watching you claim this is genocide, when it is not

you are trying to deflect from that, but I won't let you.

 

You made a claim that genocide requires killing, but you can't explain why 4 of the 5 scenarios listed by the UN do not require killing in order to be considered genocide. Was your claim wrong?

 

it's ****ing hilarious watching you claim this is genocide, when it is not

you are trying to deflect from that, but I won't let you

 

Asking you to defend your argument isn't deflection.

 

I already have. It's hilarious watching you claim this is genocide, when I quite clearly is not.

 

You have never pointed out the "killing" requirements in #2-#5 in the UN definition. Not a single time.

 

it's ****ing hilarious watching you claim this is genocide, when it is not

you are trying to deflect from that, but I won't let you

 

All you're doing is proving you can't support your claim.

 

I already have. I'm pointing out how funny it is that you keep claiming this is genocide.

 

You haven't supported your claim that genocide requires killing.

 

it's ****ing hilarious watching you claim this is genocide, when it is not

you are trying to deflect from that, but I won't let you

 

So - according to you, the Hispanics are in the midst of a genocide because their growth rate has declined more (3.7% to 2.0% in the last ten years) than any other population. Whites have remained rather constant at near .1% growth. PEW research numbers.

 

Hispanics are in no danger whatsoever of becoming minorities in their own countries, nor are they expected to decrease as a group in the future. Quite the opposite. They are expected to become a much larger group in society in the near future.

So, another failure in logic in your long list, I'm afraid.

 

Hispanics are a culture and can be of any race.

 

it's not, by your definition.

By any definition that matters, it is.

Protip: that means you're wrong.

 

they are.

but we all know you won't stand for it anyway.

 

heh yeah you won't even let people keep you honest.

 

lol, no. This does not fit any definition of genocide.

 

LoL of course it does. You simply have an incomplete understanding of the word and believe it can only be achieved through murder.