Silly you! Of course global warming is behind frigid temps MOD ALERT

I thought as much, you have nothing specific, zip, zilch, rien, nada.

 

Never expect wheat from purveyors of chaff.

 

It would probably ask if one meant "greenhouse gases and effects."

Yep, I was right:

Did you mean: "greenhouse gases and effects"
Your search - "greenhouse gasses and effects" - did not match any articles.

Suggestions:

Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
Try different keywords.
Try more general keywords.
Try fewer keywords.
Try your query on the entire web​

Did you mean to search for: "greenhouse gases and effects"
About Google Scholar All About Google Privacy & Terms Give us feedback


NB: Even the correctly spelt search proves less than fruitful.

 

No, there is only the recorded temperature record that shows no warming for 17 years. That you are unaware of this only demonstrates the absurdities of your beliefs. Just the first thing I see in a google search

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/CMIP5-73-models-vs-obs-20N-20S-MT-5-yr-means1.png

 

Catastrophists don't trust Spencer, they say that other graphs show warming, even though their high priests admit the warming isn't statistical.

They've chosen a path of unquestioning and absolute acceptance, proof that indoctrination really works.

 

Revealing you have nothing other than your own words to support your views.

 

Is English not your first language?

 

Yes it is, do you have a point or just stupid questions?

 

Yes, I do, please reread my reply to your post #429 for clarification.

 

I did. Had you presented a graph that showed warming, that wasn't statistically significant, I would have pointed out its a year or two old. They now cant even claim there has been statistically insignificant warming.

 

Well that's a start, at least.

Say what?
As I didn't present a graph, how do you know it would have been a year or two old?
Are you a mind reader, do you work with a crystal ball or a Ouija board?

Who are "they" when they're at home?

 

Because any graph that supports the assertion in your post that there has been statistically insignificant warming, would have to be a year or two old.

 

The whole point is:

I didn't post a graph

But if I had, it would probably have been like this one:



Or this one:

 

Oh look, yet another grammar nazi with nothing relevant to contribute.

Does this kind of post make you feel smart or are you just a grade school teacher who can't break the habit?

Yeah I know there isn't much to be learned from any of the 8.7 million hits, nor the 571,000 hits on google scholar.
While I realize that volume is not a measure of quality of content, there is more that sufficient access to a wide range of data that supports the fact that our civilization is having an effect on our environment.

schools out.

 

Don't actually bother trying to look up, but you might want to give looking up sarcasm in a dictionary a try sometime.

Wattsupwiththat is a Heartland Institute funded site. - you know those wonderful people who fought to the bitter end about any "scientific link" between smoking and cancer and other nasty crap?

Watts is a weatherman, not a climate scientist and his blog is RIFE with politically partisan commentary that has NO PLACE in discussion of science.

Now Dr. Spencer is a climate scientist and rather active skeptic with an agenda of his own.
I have to wonder a lot about a climate scientist who feels that a short term baseline is indicative of any kind of trend. But maybe this explains it:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Roy_Spencer

You should visit that page and read what other scientists think of his positionsm even including references and links.

And Please feel free to debunk the following observations:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2013/11/

https://www2.ucar.edu/climate/faq/how-much-has-global-temperature-risen-last-100-years

here's a little ditty:

I find it hilarious that many deniers don't appear to comprehend the difference between climate and weather, nor that short base line averaging negates long term trends and predictions. Seems they are just as easily "fed a line" as any true believer.

 

So pathetic.

You know there is this nice little online resource that has all the temperature records called woodfortrees.org. You dont have to post outdated graphics(last data point in your graph is 2003)

 

How many different temperature data sources are you using in that graph?

 

Can you not read?

 

Hmmmm - yes and it is obvious that you are not using all four sources - why not add in Hadcrut or GISS or UAH?

 

I believe that RSS and HadCRUT4 data bases are less influenced by "homogenization" and thus more reliable.

 

Mankind polluted with oil and gas well before climate records were taken, it is a fact that can't be quoted just yet.

 

This is not the first time that we've had a "Polar vortex" in our countries history and the history of the world. "The Mini Ice age" during the American revolution was just such an event and i do not believe they had Hummers back then. Storm patterns have not increase, in fact some scientists call these passed few years a "Tornado Drought" due to the decrease in tornadoes. This year and the passed few years, hurricanes have decreased in number. This is to the contrary to what Al Gore and others in the Green movement have stated.

In 2001, a British article was printed saying that due to global warming, snowfall would be a thing of the past in the next decade, and that children would no longer know the magic of snow. 2013, "Winter 2013 into 2014 is forecast to be “exceptionally severe” with above-average snowfall and plunging temperatures"- http://www.express.co.uk/

If you have a theory that covers everything, it covers nothing.

Your signature is also incorrect in regard to racism- Black panther Party has liberal ideology and has racist views as well as some Black leaders in the liberal community. Racist on both sides have a lot in common in characteristics and beliefs.

 

Meaning - he doesn't know.

 

No, it wasn't. And it is country's.

Nope. His signature is correct. Black Panthers were not racist. They were just violent and mad about "the Man". Black Muslims wanted their own country. You do not understand "racism".