Silverstein was in on it??

Discussion in '9/11' started by Ronstar, Mar 2, 2015.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Silverstein knew about the inside job in advance, and allowed the demo teams to set up the explosives, why haven't the insurance companies that forked over $6 billion in terrorism insurance payments, filed a lawsuit for fraud against Silverstein??

    oh...I guess the insurance companies are "in on it".

    or they enjoy giving away billions of dollars. ;)
     
  2. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    The 'pull it' canard attributed to Silverstein is a long debunked fantasy, however, Tony Szamboti (the resident 'expert' at AE911T) is currently claiming he saw a History Channel program where he explicitly remembers that Silverstein said 7WTC was demolished on purpose in order to prevent further loss of life, or something similar. There is a $200 prize offered by AE911T to anyone who can find a copy of this episode in order to substantiate this claim. The only person to respond to this offer claims he has a copy, but hasn't produced it as yet. No-one else has been able to find it so far.

    It is just another stunt in a desperate bid for relevance.
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    His behavior in front of journalists is that of a guilty person.

    Larry Silverstein no response to WTC 7 lies
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJsEGgc5L2c

    (MUST SEE) 911 More LIES Exposed - Larry Silverstein (REMINDER)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MODMG-yfsDs

    Larry Silverstein avoids 9/11 questions
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGGHPNW-CWs


    The proof that it was an inside job is crushing.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=348380&p=1063729867#post1063729867

    I would bet he was in on it.


    Maybe they know they have no chance of winning because they have no proof.
     
  4. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    those aren't journalists, but frauds and nuts.
     
  5. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Truther economics 101.

    1. Destroy your investment.
    2. Pay the lease on property you cannot sublease for 10+ years.
    3. Receive an insurance payout that is a fraction of the cost of building a new building on the site.
    4. ?
    5. Profit!
     
  6. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't you think the fact that they had him checkmated means anything?
     
  7. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113

    crazy that Silverstein bought lots of terrorism insurance, just months before the attacks huh??????????????

    ;)
     
  8. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/non sequitur
    (excerpt)
    --------------------------------------------------
    Definition of NON SEQUITUR

    a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said
    --------------------------------------------------


    Please address the issue I raised.
     
  9. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    how the Truthers haven't contacted the insurance companies about the massive fraud?
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    because in their eyes,if a set of buildings that cost 5 gazillion dollars to build,and brought in half a gazillion a year in pure profit,were to be destroyed,and the owner got only 4 gazillion from the insurance companies,the owner HAD to be in on it.....after all,four gazillion dollars profit baby!

    Errrrrrrrrrrr,wait.....
     
  11. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Silverstein bought terrorism insurance for the WTC, then blew them up...and is now collecting insurance money?

    Im gonna contact his insurance company right away and report this fraud.
     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    113
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    refused to answer WHAT 'legitimate' question,scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c?

    Loonytunes truther accusations don't qualify as a 'question'
     
  14. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    why haven't the insurance companies sued Silverstein, if he was "in on it"?

    insurance companies ENJOY giving away billions of dollars for fraud?

    lol!!!!!
     
  15. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    I'd ignore that garbage as well.
     
  16. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    their questions are invalid
     
  17. ararmer1919

    ararmer1919 Banned

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    8,605
    Likes Received:
    2,150
    Trophy Points:
    113
    First off I'm astonished that you consider those questions. Second off I'm complete mind blown that you think refusing to answer those "questions" is somehow proof of guilt. Wow. You truthers never fail to amuse me.
     
  18. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Start watching this video at the 2:12 time mark.

    (MUST SEE) 911 More LIES Exposed - Larry Silverstein (REMINDER)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MODMG-yfsDs


    The journalist asked him to clarify his position. He refused to answer. Please explain why that was not a legitimate question. Asking for a clarification seems pretty legitimate to me.
     
  19. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there are NO "journalists" in those videos.

    just harrassing children who have no brains and no talent.
     
  20. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please explain why you don't consider the question to be legitimate.


    Here's some stuff about the media you should check out.
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=chomsky+media
     
  21. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113

    no explanation needed. true journalists don't behave like these juvenile delinquents.
     

Share This Page