Sorry extreme liberals, but homosexuality IS a choice

That quote you posted doesn't prove that I believe that homo/heterosexuality is defined as action only, and not desire.

 

For myself, If I was ready to have sex, and presented with a naked man or a naked woman and told that both wanted to have sex with me, but that I had to pick one to have sex with... I would never never never, ever ever. Never, consciously choose to have sex with a man. That's because I feel no sexual desire for men. I may or may not choose to have sex with the woman either. But if she was attractive to me, 25-30, 5ft 5, long hair, B Cup, Petite but not skinny, sexy feet, nice eyes, lived near me, liked to water ski and her favorite movie was Fight Club? I would probably have sex with her.

I decline the man and choose the woman (in this case) because.... wait for it..... I am a Hetero-Sexual Man. Even have she not met my stringent standards and refused her and left. I would still be a heterosexual Man.

Now let's say that someone offered me $10,000,000 to have sex with any man on the planet that I chose. I picked $10,000,000 because for that much money (and I get to pick) I would do it. BUT. This man, would be the prettiest man you have ever seen. I would go to Thailand and pick the prettiest she-boy they had. The one that straight men hit on all the time cus they can't tell the difference. I would make it quick, get it done, leave, collect my $10,000,000. Pick the prettiest 3 (female) Thia dancing girls and have them give me a 3 hour scrub down and the F%^&*K like it was my last time.

After all that, $10,000,000... sex with a guy... hookers all weekend... I would still be 100% Heterosexual. Because having sex with a guy for $10,000,000 doesn't make you a homosexual, it makes you a darn good businessman.

Thank you for your time.

 

I don't think you know what you believe. Are you Homosexual?

 

No, it means you dabbled in homosexuality and got paid for it.

 

with regard to my example above: Having sex with a man is a homosexual "act", but in no way makes you a homosexual.


Has this all just been about semantics??? Really?

 

The term is homosexuality, defined as sexual behavior. Behavior is a choice. When you define homosexuality as sexual behavior, it is always a choice.

 

What forum do you think you're on?

 

Not necessarily. But some people aren't even sure who they are or are not attracted to, regardless of whether or not they're vigins.

I'm not twisting and squirming. I'm answering your questions honestly and directly.

 

Are you homosexual?

 

Absolutely correct.

 

Is this a trick question?

 

Uh...no?

 

Right, and those that are trying to define their sexuality, sexual preference by... wait for it.... your words..... "who they are or are not attracted to".



Still confused or do we need to go another 500 posts. You just let me know. I'm here to help.

 

I think I am on the same forum as you. politicalforum.com

 

I would be the exact same way. We most certainly would conciously choose to not have sex with the man because we are not attracted to men and have no incentive to engage in homosexual behavior.

But that doesn't mean that we couldn't have chosen to engage in homosexual behavior.

A bit picky, aren't you?

For me, as long as we're both single, she's attractive to me, over 18, not overweight/underweight, and doesn't have VD, it would be go time.

Correct.

Wrong. You'd still be heterosexual by attraction but you'd be both homosexual and heterosexual (aka bisexual) by behavior.

 

Quote Originally Posted by r3000 View Post
Yes, but then you are doing the "Act" for money and not because you are sexually attracted to men.

Which wouldn't make you a homosexual......

 

Good for you.

Repetetive. Already answered in post 600.

 

By definition, it does make you a homosexual.

 

Repetitive. Already answered in post 600.

 

Yes it would. A homosexual is an individual who exhibits homosexuality. One of the definitions of homosexuality is sexual behavior with a person or persons of the same sex. By definition, that would make you a homosexual.

 

They could do that if they wanted to. But attraction is only one aspect of sexuality. Behavior is the other.

I wasn't confused to begin with.

I'm not going to attempt to predict how long this conversation will take. You can feel free to if you want.

Help what?

 

NO, we most certainly do not agree. you said you might very well choose the man.

Thank you for answering, you're not homosexual. even though might very well have chosen to have sex with the man. I still thin kyour not really sure who you are.

In your example, I wouldn't have ever, never never, chosen the man. never. You, by your own words. just might have. So at least that would make you bi-sexual, or even homosexual.

Oh yes, you have no idea......

well in my example above, having sex with the Thia girly-boy for $10,000,000 would be a homosexual act yes. But I wouldn't be homosexual by behavior. Homosexual by behavior would be me having sex with the Thia girly-boy for free (or me paying her/him) because that would be due to attraction over a Thia girl-girl. So no.

It's about attraction, you said it yourself. Don't deny it.

 

He said he has the option.

I think you are misunderstanding or misapplying "choice". Let's put it this way: you're alone in a room with a female, do you rape her?

Not at all true, you are adopting homosexual. Does it matter whether the reason for having sex is an orgasm versus cash? You just had sex.

There is same sex attraction and then there is same sex behavior. They mostly align, but sometimes in rare cases they do not.

 

I think you are pulling this out of thin air... So you believe that the vast majority of humans, when we still virgins, randomly choose to (and do) have sex with the same sex without any desire to do so? Without feeling sexual attraction toward that person?

People have sex by Attraction, because they are sexually attracted to someone. They may be attracted to the same sex, or the opposite sex, but it's done by attraction. Desire.

Do young people around you have sex with anyone, either sex? Because there is nothing to do, because they're board?

 

I would if the incentive was there. You would too.

Good for you.

"Wouldn't" and "Couldn't" are two different things. You're saying you wouldn't...but that by no means doesnt mean that you couldn't choose the man.

If I chose to have sex with man, you're correct.

Wrong. Homosexual acts = Homosexual behavior. Whether you did it for money or for free is absolutely irrelevant.

It can be. But it doesn't have to be.