Speaker Johnson is an accessory to crime?

You mean like the link I provided you confirming every witness for the J6 committee?
And nobody I listed is on it?
You mean like that?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/who-are-the-key-players-in-the-jan-6-committee-hearings-so-far

Leaves one to wonder what pretend land excuse you will come up with next

But then again, you accuse every poster in the thread with the same pretend land excuse because you can't dispute a post. No surprise here.

So is everybody wrong, or is it just you?

Laughable at best.

 

Or that don't have any faith in the fairness of the justice system controlled by LWers.

Yeah, as I said above it escapes a show trial or overcharge sentence.

And you think an unattributed chart that conveniently omits Biden's time proves what?[/quote]

 

Many were not hearsay witnesses, and in a congressional investigation, hearsay is acceptable . What they do is corroborate.

I got bad news for you. The 1/6 investigation got the ball rolling. Fani and Jack are finishing the job.

45 felony counts for 1/6 crimes destroys your narrative.

 

They have no value. You can't get convictions with hearsay BS.
They only call them (Instead of real witnesses) because they know, people like yourself, that don't know any better,
will regurgitate their fake claims like it means something. lol

There are no felony charges from the J6 committee. lol
But apparently you were sold on the idea there were.
Kind of like your hearsay witness ideas.

 

A Congressional investigation is not about 'convictions' and on the journey to find facts, starting with hearsay evidence is useful.
In fact, in congressional committees, it's common.

Like I said, they had plenty of direct witness testimony, texts, emails, and the like. Many of these were predication for further investigation and corroboration by Jack Smith and Fani Willis.

Your understanding of the process is anemic.

No one prosecutes on hearsay evidence. UNLESS

it's corroborated.

Your claim is false. A simple search produced the following, derived from corroborated evidence at the hearing:

The House Select Committee investigating the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, made multiple criminal referrals to the Justice Department over former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election1. The committee recommended four charges against him1:

1. Obstruction of an Official Proceeding (18 U.S.C. § 1512 ©)1
2. Conspiracy to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371)1
3. Conspiracy to make a false statement (18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001)1
4. To “incite,” “assist” or “aid and comfort” an insurrection (18 U.S.C. § 2383)1

The committee labeled Trump as the “central cause” of the attack1. However, the Justice Department is not obligated to act on such referrals to charge Trump, or even to acknowledge them1. This marks the first time a former president has been the subject of a criminal referral by Congress2. Please note that the Department of Justice is under no obligation to consider a criminal prosecution based on the referrals3.

Special Counsel Jack Smith did bring charges against former President Donald Trump that were mentioned in the January 6 committee report123. The charges include:
​

1. Conspiracy to defraud the United States: This charge is related to Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election2.
2. Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding: This charge is also related to the events leading up to the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol2.
3. Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding: This charge is part of the indictment handed up by a federal grand jury2.

​

J6 is not a criminal investigation but if crimes are uncovered they will be referred, as was the case.

Apparently you did not do your homework that a simple search would refute.