Specific pieces of evidence showing 9/11 s an inside job

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, May 2, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Here's the cab driver who was in the wrong place at the right time. This 80 minute doc proves a flyover easily. Also, if the wings had come in contact with light poles the plane would have crashed before it got to the Pentagon.


    <sigh> No,it wouldn't have.....light poles are designed to shear off at the base with minimum force,so drivers who hit them won't be driving into an immovable object and thus killing their fool selves...http://www.transpo.com/Pole-Safe.html
     
  2. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Couldn't respond to your first set of lies so you move on to MORE bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lies? :lol: Good one! Just what I expect from the likes of you. It is no surprise truthers are stupid enough to try and pretend that the victims of 9/11 should all be in the SSDI, yet the SSA clearly states that the SSDI is NOT comprehensive. Source

    Given that a person has to specifically report the death to the SSA, and that the record only goes into the SSDI when benefits are no longer being paid out, I'm not surprised at all many names aren't in there. Then again, unlike the kneejerk truther reactions, I bother to investigate and find out the truth rather than make a fool out of myself by parroting the works of others as though it is relevant.
     
  3. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe he thinks every one of them is in the witness protection program. :lol: Just when you thought he wouldn't come up with a more retarded claim than "orbs" spinning around the towers....
     
  4. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    56,129
    Likes Received:
    16,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1st sir you are making the outlandish claim that the noises heard when the building collapsed were caused by explosive devices. It is up to you to provide evidence that such noises were from explosive devices not hundred of other sounds one might normally associate with the collapse of a large building.

    2nd since the basic assumption is the use of nanothermate which by itself is not an explosive device but rather an incendiary that burns really hot why would you expect to hear nano thermate explode.

    3rd if you are going to allege something you should at least get your story consistant with the know facts about it's ingredients.
     
  5. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There will be different testimonials that must be thoroughly examined.
     

Share This Page