That's two not down, and no more to go? Durham, after spending more time where he was supposed to investigate the investigators and prove Trump was the victim if deep state out-to-get-him politics, fizzles on his second indictment in that ol' heads-will-roll fashion. Who is he indicting? Was it Comey? Was it Strzok? Was it Mueller? Was it McCabe? Any of the fellows whom Trump alleged were 'angry democrats' (actually, most were Republicans) ? Nope, just two guys on the periphery (one a Russian guy who gave all the 'raw intel' to Steele accused of lying to the FBI) not many have ever heard of, and even then Durham couldn't pin anything on them. Maybe he should take Special Counsel lessons from Mueller, who got scores of folks from Team Trump to Team Russia, indicted and convicted and that's not bad for it all being a 'hoax' as Trump loved to tell his flock. Durham used to have some kind of reputation, well, no more. So, why can't we Dems call his investigation a hoax? I mean, if there ever were one, it would be Durham's and not Mueller's. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/ A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko — a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trump’s ties to Russia — not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information. The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Three and one half years and spit to show for it. Give it up, Durham, there is no 'there' there. In fact, I suspect the only reason you were assigned by Barr to 'investigate the investigators' was to get Trump off of Barr's back. You shouldn't have taken the job, in the first place, this you should have realized, unless, of course, you were a Trumpster, yourself which no investigator should be on anyone's side, ever.
